Literature DB >> 33849544

Rural and urban differences in patient experience in China: a coarsened exact matching study from the perspective of residents.

Dantong Zhao1, Zhongliang Zhou2, Chi Shen1,3, Rashed Nawaz1, Dan Li1, Yangling Ren1, Yaxin Zhao4, Dan Cao1, Xiaohui Zhai4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient experience is a key measure widely used to evaluate quality of healthcare, yet there is little discussion about it in China using national survey data. This study aimed to explore rural and urban differences in patient experience in China.
METHODS: Data regarding this study were drawn from Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) 2015, with a sample size of 9604. Patient experience was measured by the evaluation on healthcare services. Coarsened exact matching (CEM) method was used to balance covariates between the rural and urban respondents. Three thousand three hundred seventy-two participants finally comprised the matched cohort, including 1592 rural residents and 1780 urban residents. Rural and urban differences in patient experience were tested by ordinary least-squares regression and ordered logistic regression.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) score of patient experience for rural and urban residents was 72.35(17.32) and 69.45(17.00), respectively. Urban residents reported worse patient experience than rural counterparts (Crude analysis: Coef. = - 2.897, 95%CI: - 4.434, - 1.361; OR = 0.706, 95%CI: 0.595, 0.838; Multivariate analysis: Coef. = - 3.040, 95%CI: - 4.473, - 1.607; OR = 0.675, 95%CI: 0.569, 0.801). Older (Coef. = 2.029, 95%CI: 0.338, 3.719) and healthier (Coef. = 2.287, 95%CI: 0.729, 3.845; OR = 1.217, 95%CI: 1.008, 1.469) rural residents living in western area (Coef. = 2.098, 95%CI: 0.464, 3.732; OR = 1.276, 95%CI: 1.044, 1.560) with higher social status (Coef. = 1.158, 95%CI: 0.756, 1.561; OR = 1.145, 95%CI: 1.090, 1.204), evaluation on adequacy (Coef. = 7.018, 95%CI: 5.045, 8.992; OR = 2.163, 95%CI: 1.719, 2.721), distribution (Coef. = 4.464, 95%CI: 2.471, 6.456; OR = 1.658, 95%CI: 1.312, 2.096) and accessibility (Coef. = 2.995, 95%CI: 0.963, 5.026; OR = 1.525, 95%CI: 1.217, 1.911) of healthcare resources had better patient experience. In addition, urban peers with lower education (OR = 0.763, 95%CI: 0.625, 0.931) and higher family economic status (Coef. = 2.990, 95%CI: 0.959, 5.021; OR = 1.371, 95%CI: 1.090,1.723) reported better patient experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in patient experience for rural and urban residents were observed in this study. It is necessary to not only encourage residents to form a habit of seeking healthcare services in local primary healthcare institutions first and then go to large hospitals in urban areas when necessary, but also endeavor to reduce the disparity of healthcare resources between rural and urban areas by improving quality and capacity of rural healthcare institutions and primary healthcare system of China.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Coarsened exact matching; Patient experience; Rural and urban differences

Year:  2021        PMID: 33849544     DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06328-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  45 in total

1.  Development, implementation, and public reporting of the HCAHPS survey.

Authors:  Laura A Giordano; Marc N Elliott; Elizabeth Goldstein; William G Lehrman; Patrice A Spencer
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Measuring patients' experiences and outcomes.

Authors:  Nick Black; Crispin Jenkinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-02

3.  The patient experience and health outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew P Manary; William Boulding; Richard Staelin; Seth W Glickman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Accelerating Improvement and Narrowing Gaps: Trends in Patients' Experiences with Hospital Care Reflected in HCAHPS Public Reporting.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Christopher W Cohea; William G Lehrman; Elizabeth H Goldstein; Paul D Cleary; Laura A Giordano; Megan K Beckett; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Patient satisfaction in two Chinese provinces: rural and urban differences.

Authors:  Zhihua Yan; Dai Wan; Li Li
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.038

6.  The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries.

Authors:  Crispin Jenkinson; Angela Coulter; Stephen Bruster
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.038

7.  Measuring patient experience: concepts and methods.

Authors:  Faraz Ahmed; Jenni Burt; Martin Roland
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness.

Authors:  Cathal Doyle; Laura Lennox; Derek Bell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?

Authors:  Siri Wiig; Marianne Storm; Karina Aase; Martha Therese Gjestsen; Marit Solheim; Stig Harthug; Glenn Robert; Naomi Fulop
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Association of inpatient hospital experience with patient safety indicators: a cross-sectional, Canadian study.

Authors:  Kyle A Kemp; Maria J Santana; Danielle A Southern; Brandi McCormack; Hude Quan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Urban-Rural Disparities and Associated Factors of Health Care Utilization Among Cancer Patients in China.

Authors:  Haipeng Wang; Xingxing Hua; Nengliang Yao; Nan Zhang; Jialin Wang; Roger Anderson; Xiaojie Sun
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-04

2.  3D Differential Equation Model for Patients' Choice of Hospital in China.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Zhao; Lihong Jiang; Kaihong Zhao
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.