Literature DB >> 12389801

The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries.

Crispin Jenkinson1, Angela Coulter, Stephen Bruster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop and test a core set of questions to measure patients' experiences of in-patient care. Questions were selected from the bank of items developed for use in in-patient surveys undertaken by the Picker Institute for the purposes of assessing the quality of care.
DESIGN: The data reported here come from surveys of patients who had attended acute care hospitals in five countries: the United Kingdom, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, and the USA. Questionnaires were mailed to patients' homes within 1 month of discharge, either to all patients, or to a random sample, discharged during a specified period. SAMPLE: A total of 62 925 questionnaires were returned, with response rates of 65% (UK), 74% (Germany), 63% (Sweden), 52% (Switzerland), and 46% (USA).
RESULTS: Fifteen items were selected from the bank of questions included in the Picker in-patient questionnaires. These items have a high degree of face validity and when summed to an index they show a high degree of construct validity and internal reliability consistency. DISCUSSION: Fifteen items derived from the longer form Picker in-patient survey have been found to provide a meaningful picture of patient experiences of health care, and constitute the 15-item Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire. These questions comprise a core set that should be measured in all in-patient facility surveys. The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire represents a step forward in the measurement of patient experience as it provides a core set of questions around which further optional modules may be added. Scores are easy to interpret and actionable.
CONCLUSION: This small set of questions could be incorporated into in-patient surveys in different settings, enabling the comparison of hospital performance and the establishment of national or international benchmarks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12389801     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/14.5.353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  159 in total

1.  Problematic hospital experiences among adult patients with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Lakshmi Lattimer; Carlton Haywood; Sophie Lanzkron; Neda Ratanawongsa; Shawn M Bediako; Mary Catherine Beach
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-11

2.  Measuring quality of health care from the user's perspective in 41 countries: psychometric properties of WHO's questions on health systems responsiveness.

Authors:  N B Valentine; G J Bonsel; C J L Murray
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  [Implementation of a standardized perioperative pain management concept in three hospitals of a consortium].

Authors:  P Saur; U Junker; P Gaus; H Haeske-Seeberg; C Blöchle; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Impact of geographical proximity on health care seeking behaviour in northern oman.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Mandhari; Samir Al-Adawi; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Mohammed Al-Shafaee; Liyam Eloul
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2008-11

5.  Patient assessments of a hypothetical medical error: effects of health outcome, disclosure, and staff responsiveness.

Authors:  A Cleopas; A Villaveces; A Charvet; P A Bovier; V Kolly; T V Perneger
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-04

6.  Challenging the holy grail of hospital accreditation: a cross sectional study of inpatient satisfaction in the field of cardiology.

Authors:  Cornelia Sack; Peter Lütkes; Wolfram Günther; Raimund Erbel; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Gerald J Holtmann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The Prostate Care Questionnaire for Carers (PCQ-C): reliability, validity and acceptability.

Authors:  Paul Sinfield; Richard Baker; Carolyn Tarrant; Shona Agarwal; Andrew M Colman; William Steward; Roger Kockelbergh; John K Mellon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Conflicting priorities: evaluation of an intervention to improve nurse-parent relationships on a Tanzanian paediatric ward.

Authors:  Rachel N Manongi; Fortunata R Nasuwa; Rose Mwangi; Hugh Reyburn; Anja Poulsen; Clare I R Chandler
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2009-06-23

9.  Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care.

Authors:  Mariëlle Ouwens; Rosella Hermens; Marlies Hulscher; Saskia Vonk-Okhuijsen; Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen; René Termeer; Henri Marres; Hub Wollersheim; Richard Grol
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Improving parent satisfaction: an intervention to increase neonatal parent-provider communication.

Authors:  S Weiss; E Goldlust; Y E Vaucher
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 2.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.