Literature DB >> 33849504

A meta-analysis of the association between physical demands of domestic labor and back pain among women.

Abisola Osinuga1, Chelsea Hicks2, Segun E Ibitoye3, Marin Schweizer4, Nathan B Fethke2, Kelly K Baker2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Back pain (BP) is among the most common musculoskeletal problems globally and is a leading contributor to disability among adults. Millions of women especially those in low-income settings, engage in strenuous domestic activities that may increase their risk of BP. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to estimate the association between physically demanding domestic labor (PDDL) which is characterized as intensity, frequency, duration of work and biomechanical risk factors of work and BP among women.
METHODS: Five databases were searched for records published from January 1991 to March 2020; and results from 11studies were included in the meta-analysis. A random effects model and the generic inverse-variance method was used to estimate the pooled odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and the degree of heterogeneity among studies (I2). Stratified and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify the influence of outliers and identify the sources of heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Exposure to high PDDL was significantly associated with BP (OR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.30, 2.04; I2 = 70%). The odds of back pain were highest among the following groups: women performing domestic labor in non-neutral postures (OR = 2.30; 95% CI = 1.75-3.04; I2 = 0%; N = 4 studies) and among women from low- and middle-income countries (OR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.58-2.49; I2 = 29%; N = 5 studies). We found no evidence of publication bias (Egger's test p-value = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: PDDL may significantly increase a woman's risk of experiencing BP, but larger prospective studies are needed to further investigate the association. Presenting data on how domestic work affects the musculoskeletal health of women will be important in designing future interventions (behavioral, infrastructural, and ergonomic) that can reduce the burdens from domestic labor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back pain; Biomechanical; Domestic labor; Meta-analysis; Physical demands; Women

Year:  2021        PMID: 33849504     DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01294-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Womens Health        ISSN: 1472-6874            Impact factor:   2.809


  56 in total

Review 1.  Smoking and low back pain. A systematic literature review of 41 journal articles reporting 47 epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  C Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Causal assessment of occupational carrying and low back pain: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Eugene K Wai; Darren M Roffey; Paul Bishop; Brian K Kwon; Simon Dagenais
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 3.  What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention.

Authors:  Jan Hartvigsen; Mark J Hancock; Alice Kongsted; Quinette Louw; Manuela L Ferreira; Stéphane Genevay; Damian Hoy; Jaro Karppinen; Glenn Pransky; Joachim Sieper; Rob J Smeets; Martin Underwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Increased low back pain prevalence in females than in males after menopause age: evidences based on synthetic literature review.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Jùn-Qīng Wáng; Zoltán Káplár
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-04

5.  Predictors of back pain in a general population cohort.

Authors:  Jacek A Kopec; Eric C Sayre; John M Esdaile
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study.

Authors:  Damian Hoy; Lyn March; Peter Brooks; Fiona Blyth; Anthony Woolf; Christopher Bain; Gail Williams; Emma Smith; Theo Vos; Jan Barendregt; Chris Murray; Roy Burstein; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Low back pain and obesity.

Authors:  Dafina Ibrahimi-Kaçuri; Ardiana Murtezani; Shkurta Rrecaj; Merita Martinaj; Bekim Haxhiu
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2015-04-06

8.  Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors:  Aimin Wu; Lyn March; Xuanqi Zheng; Jinfeng Huang; Xiangyang Wang; Jie Zhao; Fiona M Blyth; Emma Smith; Rachelle Buchbinder; Damian Hoy
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

Review 9.  A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people's lives.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Sue Patterson; Sandra Eldridge; Clive Seale; Tamar Pincus; Dévan Rajendran; Christian Fossum; Martin Underwood
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Psychosocial areas of worklife and chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gabriele Buruck; Anne Tomaschek; Johannes Wendsche; Elke Ochsmann; Denise Dörfel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  1 in total

1.  Understanding Rural Women's Domestic Work Experiences (DWE) in Ibadan, Nigeria: Development of a Measurement Tool Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

Authors:  Abisola Osinuga; Brandi Janssen; Nathan B Fethke; William T Story; John A Imaledo; Kelly K Baker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.