Literature DB >> 33849491

Short uncemented femoral component for hip revision: prognosis and risk factors associated with failure.

Zeming Liu1, Bo Liu1, Bingshi Zhang1, Wenhui Ma1, Tao Wu1, Jia Huo1, Sikai Liu1, Yongtai Han2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The application of short femoral stems is partially restricted in revision surgery. This study will demonstrate the therapeutic effect and unsuitable situation for short stem revision.
METHODS: Demographic characteristics of all patients were recorded in detail (Table 1). Anteroposterior view radiographic examinations of proximal femur are necessary before and after the operation for patients. The primary outcome of interest was the survival rate of the femoral stem at the final follow-up. Risk factors for failure were also investigated. The secondary outcomes of interest included the Harris hip score, excellent to good rate and incidence of complications. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed for comparisons between continuous variables. The chi-square test was performed for comparisons between categorical variables. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between potential risk factors and the failure of revision surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 381 patients with short stems were retrospectively reviewed. There were 188 males and 193 females. The average age and body mass index before revision surgery were 58.85 ± 13.46 years and 23.72 ± 3.40 kg/m2, respectively. The mid-term survival rate of the short femoral component was 94.23%. The prognosis and complications of patients between the two groups were compared. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the Harris score, complication incidence or survival rate of the femoral component. The strongest risk factor in this study was intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture during revision surgery (HR = 5.477, 95% CI = 2.156-13.913).
CONCLUSION: Three risk factors for failure were identified: ageing, osteoporosis and intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture during revision surgery. Therefore, a short femoral stem should be implanted in patients with these risk factors with additional caution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip revision; Short stem; Uncemented

Year:  2021        PMID: 33849491     DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01196-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Surg        ISSN: 1471-2482            Impact factor:   2.102


  3 in total

1.  Articular Noise After THA Using Delta CoC Bearings Has Little Impact on Quality of Life.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Chatelet; Michel-Henri Fessy; Mo Saffarini; Alain Machenaud; Laurent Jacquot
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Predictive outcomes of revision total hip replacement--a consecutive series of 1176 patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  A Philpott; J S Weston-Simons; G Grammatopoulos; P Bejon; H S Gill; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D W Murray; H Pandit
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Posterior approach, fracture diagnosis, and american society of anesthesiology class iii-iv are associated with increased risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of 33,337 operations from the finnish arthroplasty register.

Authors:  Valtteri J Panula; Elina M Ekman; Mikko S Venäläinen; Inari Laaksonen; Riku Klén; Jaason J Haapakoski; Antti P Eskelinen; Laura L Elo; Keijo T Mäkelä
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.360

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.