Literature DB >> 33845592

EXPRESS: Performance characteristics of five SARS-CoV-2 serological assays: clinical utility in healthcare workers.

Emma Heffernan1, Lisa Kennedy2, Margaret Hannan3, Navneet Ramlaul4, Stephanie Denieffe5, Garry Courtney4, Alison Watt6, John Hurley7, Maureen Lynch3, Maria C Fitzgibbon8,9.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: SARS-CoV-2 which causes Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of acute infection relies on RT-PCR based viral detection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the optimal serological testing strategy for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies which provides an important indicator of prior infection and potential short-term immunity.
METHODS: The sensitivity and specificity of four different ELISA assays (Euroimmun IgG, Euroimmun NCP-IgG, Fortress and DIAsource) and one CLIA assay (Roche ELECSYS) were evaluated in 423 samples; 137 patients with confirmed RT-PCR COVID-19 infection (true positives), and 100 pre-pandemic samples collected prior to October 2019 (true negatives). A further 186 samples were collected from healthcare staff and analysed by all five assays.
RESULTS: The Fortress ELISA assay demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity followed by the Roche ECLIA assay. The highest overall sensitivity came from the assays that measured total antibody (IgM-IgG combined) and the three assays that performed the best (Fortress, Roche, Euroimmun IgG) all have different antigens as their target proteins which suggests that antigen target does not affect assay performance. In mildly symptomatic participants with either a negative RT-PCR or no RT-PCR performed, 16.76% had detectable antibodies suggesting previous infection.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend a combined testing strategy utilising assays with different antigenic targets using the fully automated Roche ECLIA assay and confirming discordant samples with the Fortress Total Antibody ELISA assay. This study provides an important indicator of prior infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evaluation of new methods; Immunoassay

Year:  2021        PMID: 33845592     DOI: 10.1177/00045632211012728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  4 in total

1.  Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 adenovirus vector vaccination (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [AZD1222]) in heart transplant recipients aged 18 to 70 years of age.

Authors:  Richard Tanner; Neasa Starr; Grace Chan; Eimear Dempsey; Emma Heffernan; Ellen Newman; James O'Neill; Margaret M Hannan; Breda Lynch; Emer Joyce
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 13.569

2.  Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 seroepidemiological investigation among healthcare workers at a tertiary care hospital in Germany.

Authors:  Sara Tomczyk; Alexander Hönning; Julia Hermes; Marica Grossegesse; Natalie Hofmann; Janine Michel; Markus Neumann; Andreas Nitsche; Berthold Hoppe; Tim Eckmanns; Hajo Schmidt-Traub; Kristina Zappel
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 3.  Performance Characteristics of High-Throughput Serologic Assays for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 with Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization: A Review.

Authors:  Elitza S Theel
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 1.935

4.  Humoral response to heterologous prime-booster vaccination in heart transplant recipients aged 18-70 years primed with a viral vector SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Authors:  Richard Tanner; Neasa Starr; Carlos Nicolas Perez-Garcia; Grace Chan; Eimear Dempsey; Emma Heffernan; Breda Lynch; Margaret M Hannan; Emer Joyce
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.