| Literature DB >> 33842741 |
F Yu1, M L Luo2, R C Xu2,3, L Huang4, H H Yu5, M Meng5, J Q Jia2, Z H Hu1, W Z Wu1, F R Tay6, Y H Xiao1, L N Niu5, J H Chen5.
Abstract
Dentin bonding is a dynamic process that involves the penetration of adhesive resin monomers into the extrafibrillar and intrafibrillar demineralized collagen matrix using a wet-bonding technique. However, adhesive resin monomers lack the capacity to infiltrate the intrafibrillar space, and the excess water that is introduced by the wet-bonding technique remains at the bonding interface. This imperfectly bonded interface is inclined to hydrolytic degradation, severely jeopardizing the longevity of bonded clinical restorations. The present study introduces a dentin bonding scheme based on a dry-bonding technique, combined with the use of extrafibrillar demineralization and a collagen-reactive monomer (CRM)-based adhesive (CBA). Selective extrafibrillar demineralization was achieved using 1-wt% high-molecular weight (MW) carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS) within a clinically acceptable timeframe to create a less aggressive bonding substance for dentin bonding due to its selectively extrafibrillar demineralization capacity. CMCS demineralization decreased the activation of in situ collagenase, improved the shrinking resistance of demineralized collagen, and thus provided stronger and more durable bonding than traditional phosphoric acid etching. The new dentin bonding scheme that contained CMCS and CBA and used a dry-bonding technique achieved an encouraging dentin bonding strength and durability with low technical sensitivity. This bonding scheme can be used to improve the stability of the resin-dentin interface and foster the longevity of bonded clinical restorations.Entities:
Keywords: Adhesive; Carboxymethyl chitosan; Collagen; Dentin; Extrafibrillar
Year: 2021 PMID: 33842741 PMCID: PMC8022110 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Fig. 1Calcium-chelating ability of CMCS and characterization of CMCS-conditioned dentin. A. Concentration of Ca2+ chelated by 1-wt% CMCS from mineralized dentin within 15, 30, and 60 s. The Ca2+ concentration extracted by 37-wt% phosphoric acid within 15 s was 1592 ± 179 g L−1 (data not shown). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. B. Representative TEM images of the dentin surfaces after different treatments. (i) Phosphoric acid etching for 15 s created a 5-μm, top-down demineralized layer; bar = 5 μm. (ii) Higher magnification of (i); bar = 1 μm. (iii) Conditioning with 1-wt% CMCS for 30 s; bar = 1 μm. (iv) Higher magnification of (iii); collagen fibrils with remaining intrafibrillar minerals can be seen (arrowheads). C. Representative SEM images of dentin surfaces after different treatments. Left, hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS)-desiccated dentin conditioned with 37-wt% phosphoric acid for 15 s (first row) and 1-wt% CMCS for 30 s (second row); the images on the right are higher magnification images of those on the left. Right, air-dried dentin surfaces conditioned with 37-wt% phosphoric acid for 15 s (first row) and 1-wt% CMCS for 30 s (second row); the images on the right are higher magnification images of those on the left.
Fig. 2AFM observations, surface roughness quantification, zymography, and collagenase activity for dentin surfaces after different treatments. A. Representative AFM images and images of dentin conditioned with CMCS for 30 s or phosphoric acid for 15 s; left, surface topography and right, 3D vitalization. B. Surface roughness quantification. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisk above the column indicates statistically significant differences between the two groups. C. Representative images showing the zymography of dentin conditioned with 37-wt% phosphoric acid (15 s) or 1-wt% CMCS (30 s). Mineralized dentin served as control; bar = 50 μm. D. Quantification of collagenase activity. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Groups designated with different letters are statistically different (p > 0.05).
Fig. 3Bond strength and bonding interface observation of SB2 under different demineralization modes with wet- and dry-bonding techniques. A. μTBS values of SB2 using different bonding modes. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. For μTBS evaluated before aging, groups that are labeled with the same uppercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). After aging, groups that are labeled with the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). A horizontal bar indicates that there was no significant difference between the two columns (p > 0.05). B. Bonding interface observations. Images on the right are higher magnification images of those on the left. Bar = 10 μm.
Fig. 4Bond strength and bonding interface observation. A. μTBS values of different schemes. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. For μTBS evaluated before aging, groups that are labeled with the same uppercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). After aging, groups that are labeled with the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). B. Bonding interface observation. Images on the right are higher magnification images of those on the left. Bar = 10 μm.
Fig. 5AFM observation and elasticity modulus of the bonding interface. Representative AFM images of the bonding interface before (A) and after aging (C). Quantification of elasticity modulus of the hybrid layer before (B) and after aging (D). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Groups that are labeled with the same capital letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). When the wet-bonding technique was used, groups that are labeled with the same capital letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). When the dry-bonding technique was used, groups that are labeled with the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). A horizontal bar indicates that there was no significant difference between the two columns (p > 0.05).
Fig. 6Leakage level of bonding interface. Representative SEM images of bonding interfaces created by different bonding modes. Bar = 50 μm.