Literature DB >> 33842263

Prediction of optimal debulking surgery in ovarian cancer.

Yong Jung Song1,2.   

Abstract

The mainstay management of advanced ovarian cancer is maximal cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) are alternative treatments for patients with comorbidity, poor performance status, and predicted for suboptimal debulking surgery. It is the invariable principle in any situation that no residual disease after the completion of surgery is useful for patients with ovarian cancer. Therefore, the prediction of optimal debulking before the treatment of ovarian cancer is of utmost importance. Many studies have reported on the use of serum biomarkers, such as cancer antigen 125 (CA125) or human epididymis 4 (HE4), and imaging studies, such as computed tomography (CT), diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, to identify adequate surgical candidates for primary debulking surgery (PDS). Laparoscopy has also been studied as a reliable tool for the prediction of optimal debulking. Here, we summarize a review of the related literature. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ovarian cancer; optimal cytoreduction; prediction

Year:  2021        PMID: 33842263      PMCID: PMC8033079          DOI: 10.21037/gs-2019-ursoc-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  40 in total

1.  Survival impact of complete cytoreduction to no gross residual disease for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suk-Joon Chang; Melissa Hodeib; Jenny Chang; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Sean Kehoe; Jane Hook; Matthew Nankivell; Gordon C Jayson; Henry Kitchener; Tito Lopes; David Luesley; Timothy Perren; Selina Bannoo; Monica Mascarenhas; Stephen Dobbs; Sharadah Essapen; Jeremy Twigg; Jonathan Herod; Glenn McCluggage; Mahesh Parmar; Ann-Marie Swart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Diagnostic value of whole body diffusion-weighted MRI compared to computed tomography for pre-operative assessment of patients suspected for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Katrijn Michielsen; Raphaëla Dresen; Ragna Vanslembrouck; Frederik De Keyzer; Frédéric Amant; Elvier Mussen; Karin Leunen; Patrick Berteloot; Philippe Moerman; Ignace Vergote; Vincent Vandecaveye
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Influence of intraperitoneal dissemination assessed by laparoscopy on prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer: an exploratory analysis of a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vizzielli; Barbara Costantini; Lucia Tortorella; Marco Petrillo; Francesco Fanfani; Vito Chiantera; Alfredo Ercoli; Raffaella Iodice; Giovanni Scambia; Anna Fagotti
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Predicting surgical outcome in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III or IV ovarian cancer using computed tomography: a systematic review of prediction models.

Authors:  Marianne Jetske Rutten; Roelien van de Vrie; Annemarie Bruining; Anje M Spijkerboer; Ben Willem Mol; Gemma Georgette Kenter; Marrije Renate Buist
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)?

Authors:  D S Chi; E L Eisenhauer; J Lang; J Huh; L Haddad; N R Abu-Rustum; Y Sonoda; D A Levine; M Hensley; R R Barakat
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  A model for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using computed tomography.

Authors:  R E Bristow; L R Duska; N C Lambrou; E K Fishman; M J O'Neill; E L Trimble; F J Montz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  A multicenter assessment of the ability of preoperative computed tomography scan and CA-125 to predict gross residual disease at primary debulking for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Pedro T Ramirez; Debra M Sarasohn; Jerrold B Teitcher; Revathy B Iyer; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; John Denesopolis; Oliver Zivanovic; Kara C Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Robert L Coleman; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hedvig Hricak; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Impact of interval debulking surgery on clinical outcome in primary unresectable FIGO stage IIIc ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Francesco Fanfani; Gabriella Ferrandina; Giacomo Corrado; Anna Fagotti; Haim Vito Zakut; Salvatore Mancuso; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.935

10.  The Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio Predicts Patient Survival and Aggressiveness of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Wan Kyu Eo; Hye Jung Chang; Sang Hoon Kwon; Suk Bong Koh; Young Ok Kim; Yong Il Ji; Hong-Bae Kim; Ji Young Lee; Dong Soo Suh; Ki Hyung Kim; Ik Jin Chang; Heung Yeol Kim; Suk Choo Chang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.207

View more
  4 in total

1.  Metformin Use and Mortality in Women with Ovarian Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mingchuan Guo; Xiaofei Shang; Duanying Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.149

2.  A Case of Ovarian Metastasis of Pancreatic Cancer Causing Ovarian Torsion.

Authors:  Shohei Tanabe; Sachiyo Sugino; Kotaro Ichida; Kiyoshi Niiya; Syuji Morishima
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-17

3.  Development and External Validation of a Novel Model for Predicting Postsurgical Recurrence and Overall Survival After Cytoreductive R0 Resection of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Qiaqia Li; Yinghong Deng; Wei Wei; Fan Yang; An Lin; Desheng Yao; Xiaofeng Zhu; Jundong Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ovarian Cancer: Exploiting Strengths and Understanding Limitations.

Authors:  Tanja Gagliardi; Margaret Adejolu; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.