OBJECTIVE: Maximal cytoreduction to no residual disease is an important predictor of prognosis in patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Preoperative prediction of outcome of surgery should guide treatment decisions, for example, primary debulking or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. The objective of this study was to systematically review studies evaluating computed tomography imaging based models predicting the amount of residual tumor after cytoreductive surgery for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: We systematically searched the literature for studies investigating multivariable models that predicted the amount of residual disease after cytoreductive surgery in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer using computed tomography imaging. Detected studies were scored for quality and classified as model derivation or validation studies. We summarized their performance in terms of discrimination when possible. RESULTS: We identified 11 studies that described 13 models. The 4 models that were externally validated all had a poor discriminative capacity (sensitivity, 15%-79%; specificity, 32%-64%). The only internal validated model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.67. Peritoneal thickening, mesenterial and diaphragm disease, and ascites were most often used as predictors in the final models. We did not find studies that assessed the impact of prediction model on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there are no external validated studies with a good predictive performance for residual disease. Studies of better quality are needed, especially studies that focus on predicting any residual disease after surgery.
OBJECTIVE: Maximal cytoreduction to no residual disease is an important predictor of prognosis in patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Preoperative prediction of outcome of surgery should guide treatment decisions, for example, primary debulking or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. The objective of this study was to systematically review studies evaluating computed tomography imaging based models predicting the amount of residual tumor after cytoreductive surgery for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: We systematically searched the literature for studies investigating multivariable models that predicted the amount of residual disease after cytoreductive surgery in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer using computed tomography imaging. Detected studies were scored for quality and classified as model derivation or validation studies. We summarized their performance in terms of discrimination when possible. RESULTS: We identified 11 studies that described 13 models. The 4 models that were externally validated all had a poor discriminative capacity (sensitivity, 15%-79%; specificity, 32%-64%). The only internal validated model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.67. Peritoneal thickening, mesenterial and diaphragm disease, and ascites were most often used as predictors in the final models. We did not find studies that assessed the impact of prediction model on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there are no external validated studies with a good predictive performance for residual disease. Studies of better quality are needed, especially studies that focus on predicting any residual disease after surgery.
Authors: Rudy S Suidan; Pedro T Ramirez; Debra M Sarasohn; Jerrold B Teitcher; Revathy B Iyer; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; John Denesopolis; Oliver Zivanovic; Kara C Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Robert L Coleman; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hedvig Hricak; Dennis S Chi Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: G M Nieuwenhuyzen-de Boer; W Hofhuis; N Reesink-Peters; S Willemsen; I A Boere; I G Schoots; J M J Piek; L N Hofman; J J Beltman; W J van Driel; H M J Werner; A Baalbergen; A M L D van Haaften-de Jong; M Dorman; L Haans; I Nedelcu; P C Ewing-Graham; H J van Beekhuizen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Dirk Timmerman; François Planchamp; Tom Bourne; Chiara Landolfo; Andreas du Bois; Luis Chiva; David Cibula; Nicole Concin; Daniela Fischerova; Wouter Froyman; Guillermo Gallardo Madueño; Birthe Lemley; Annika Loft; Liliana Mereu; Philippe Morice; Denis Querleu; Antonia Carla Testa; Ignace Vergote; Vincent Vandecaveye; Giovanni Scambia; Christina Fotopoulou Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Joline F Roze; Jacob P Hoogendam; Fleur T van de Wetering; René Spijker; Leen Verleye; Joan Vlayen; Wouter B Veldhuis; Rob Jpm Scholten; Ronald P Zweemer Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-10-08