Literature DB >> 25695545

Predicting surgical outcome in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III or IV ovarian cancer using computed tomography: a systematic review of prediction models.

Marianne Jetske Rutten1, Roelien van de Vrie, Annemarie Bruining, Anje M Spijkerboer, Ben Willem Mol, Gemma Georgette Kenter, Marrije Renate Buist.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Maximal cytoreduction to no residual disease is an important predictor of prognosis in patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Preoperative prediction of outcome of surgery should guide treatment decisions, for example, primary debulking or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. The objective of this study was to systematically review studies evaluating computed tomography imaging based models predicting the amount of residual tumor after cytoreductive surgery for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.
METHODS: We systematically searched the literature for studies investigating multivariable models that predicted the amount of residual disease after cytoreductive surgery in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer using computed tomography imaging. Detected studies were scored for quality and classified as model derivation or validation studies. We summarized their performance in terms of discrimination when possible.
RESULTS: We identified 11 studies that described 13 models. The 4 models that were externally validated all had a poor discriminative capacity (sensitivity, 15%-79%; specificity, 32%-64%). The only internal validated model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.67. Peritoneal thickening, mesenterial and diaphragm disease, and ascites were most often used as predictors in the final models. We did not find studies that assessed the impact of prediction model on outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there are no external validated studies with a good predictive performance for residual disease. Studies of better quality are needed, especially studies that focus on predicting any residual disease after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25695545     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  17 in total

1.  microRNA-494 is a potential prognostic marker and inhibits cellular proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting SIRT1 in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Aijun Yang; Xuenan Wang; Chunna Yu; Zhenzhen Jin; Lingxia Wei; Jinghe Cao; Qin Wang; Min Zhang; Lin Zhang; Lei Zhang; Cuifang Hao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  Prediction of optimal debulking surgery in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yong Jung Song
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

3.  A multicenter assessment of the ability of preoperative computed tomography scan and CA-125 to predict gross residual disease at primary debulking for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Pedro T Ramirez; Debra M Sarasohn; Jerrold B Teitcher; Revathy B Iyer; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; John Denesopolis; Oliver Zivanovic; Kara C Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Robert L Coleman; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hedvig Hricak; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  The role of CT, PET-CT, and MRI in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Maurits Peter Engbersen; Willemien Van Driel; Doenja Lambregts; Max Lahaye
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 5.  CT of Ovarian Cancer for Primary Treatment Planning: What the Surgeon Needs to Know-Radiology In Training.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Ines Nikolovski; Kara Long Roche; Yulia Lakhman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 29.146

6.  A novel index for preoperative, non-invasive prediction of macro-radical primary surgery in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer-a part of the Danish prospective pelvic mass study.

Authors:  Mona Aarenstrup Karlsen; Carsten Fagö-Olsen; Estrid Høgdall; Tine Henrichsen Schnack; Ib Jarle Christensen; Lotte Nedergaard; Lene Lundvall; Magnus Christian Lydolph; Svend Aage Engelholm; Claus Høgdall
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 7.  Current update on malignant epithelial ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Sherif B Elsherif; Priya R Bhosale; Chandana Lall; Christine O Menias; Malak Itani; Kristina A Butler; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-05

8.  Adjuvant Use of PlasmaJet Device During Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: Results of the PlaComOv-study, a Randomized Controlled Trial in The Netherlands.

Authors:  G M Nieuwenhuyzen-de Boer; W Hofhuis; N Reesink-Peters; S Willemsen; I A Boere; I G Schoots; J M J Piek; L N Hofman; J J Beltman; W J van Driel; H M J Werner; A Baalbergen; A M L D van Haaften-de Jong; M Dorman; L Haans; I Nedelcu; P C Ewing-Graham; H J van Beekhuizen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 9.  ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Dirk Timmerman; François Planchamp; Tom Bourne; Chiara Landolfo; Andreas du Bois; Luis Chiva; David Cibula; Nicole Concin; Daniela Fischerova; Wouter Froyman; Guillermo Gallardo Madueño; Birthe Lemley; Annika Loft; Liliana Mereu; Philippe Morice; Denis Querleu; Antonia Carla Testa; Ignace Vergote; Vincent Vandecaveye; Giovanni Scambia; Christina Fotopoulou
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing tumour resectability in advanced epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Joline F Roze; Jacob P Hoogendam; Fleur T van de Wetering; René Spijker; Leen Verleye; Joan Vlayen; Wouter B Veldhuis; Rob Jpm Scholten; Ronald P Zweemer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.