Literature DB >> 33841842

Association of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D with obesity-related indices in Chinese adults: A cross-sectional study.

Zhongxia Ren1, Ai Zhao2, Yan Wang3,4, Liping Meng3,4, Ignatius Man-Yau Szeto3,4, Chenlu Yang1, Meichen Wang1, Jian Zhang1, Wei Wu1, Peiyu Wang5, Yumei Zhang1.   

Abstract

Obesity has been a well-known risk factor of low-level serum vitamin D. Compared with the traditional obesity-related indicator (body mass index, BMI), associations for two novel anthropometric indices, a body shape index (ABSI) and body roundness index (BRI) with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency, still remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the associations of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) status with these three obesity-related indices among Chinese adults. A total of 1666 individuals were included. Anthropometric measurements were performed to calculate the indices, and fasting blood was collected to determine serum 25(OH)D deficiency (<12 ng/ml) and insufficiency (12-20 ng/ml). Deficiency or insufficiency of 25(OH)D was found in 37.5% and 43.1% of the participants, respectively. After adjustment for potential confounders, a significantly increased prevalence of 25(OH)D deficiency was observed for higher ABSI (OR Q4 vs Q1 2.334, 95% CI 1.458-3.734; p trend = 0.002) and BRI (OR Q4 vs Q1 2. 215, 95%CI 1.365-3.594; p trend = 0.010), and for higher BMI in men. Regarding 25(OH)D insufficiency, a significant association was also found for ABSI (OR Q4 vs Q1 2.372, 95%CI 1.558-3.612; p trend = 0.001). The area under the ROC of ABSI (0.731, 95%CI 0.687-0.774) for predicting a low level of 25(OH)D was significantly larger than that of BMI (0.695, 95%CI 0.649-0.741) in men, but not in women. A positive association between obesity and lower 25(OH)D serum concentration was found among Chinese adults. Besides BMI, novel obesity-related indicator, ABSI and BRI were associated with lower serum 25(OH)D to some extent, and further studies are needed to clarify their potential to be used as screening tools in clinical practice.
© 2021 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anthropometry; obesity; vitamin D

Year:  2021        PMID: 33841842      PMCID: PMC8020955          DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Sci Nutr        ISSN: 2048-7177            Impact factor:   2.863


INTRODUCTION

Vitamin D, as a nutrient closely related to human health, has been studied for a long time. In addition to its well‐established effects on the musculoskeletal system (Bischoff‐Ferrari, 2012; Holick, 2005), the relationship between vitamin D and obesity has drawn more and more attention (Pereira‐Santos et al., 2015; Pourshahidi, 2015). Considering that vitamin D deficiency has emerged as one of the major global public health problems concomitantly with obesity, it is important to elucidate the underlying mechanism and implement early interventions (Holick & Chen, 2008; James, 2018; Pereira‐Santos et al., 2015). Vitamin D3 or D2 is mainly synthesized in the skin in response to solar ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation and in lesser amounts from dietary or supplementary intake (Holick et al., 2011). As a fat‐soluble vitamin, it tends to be stored in and released from adipocytes into the circulation, transported to the liver, and then converted to 25‐hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D), the latter form being recognized as a general indicator of vitamin D status (Holick, 2007). According to previous studies, possible hypotheses underlying vitamin D deficiency occurring in obese subjects include excessive sequestration in adipose tissue, less sun exposure due to a sedentary/indoor lifestyle, decreased expression of vitamin D‐dependent receptors, changes in the gut microbiota, gut‐derived metabolites, simple volumetric dilution, and so on (Barrea et al., 2019; Cheng et al., 2010; Drincic et al., 2012; Looker, 2007; Malmberg et al., 2014; Martini & Wood, 2006). Growing studies revealed that it is reasonable to predict vitamin D deficiency using obesity‐related anthropometric indices, which has the advantage of being simple, inexpensive, and noninvasive. Body mass index (BMI), as a traditional anthropometric index according to height and weight, is possibly the most commonly assessed indicator of obesity in relevant studies (Wood et al., 2012). Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses have revealed a significant correlation between serum 25(OH)D and BMI, albeit with gender and country development status‐related heterogeneity (S. Rafiq & Jeppesen, 2018; Saneei et al., 2013). Despite its widespread use, it should be emphasized that the capacity of BMI to distinguish fat from muscle or to reflect fat distribution is limited (Aly et al., 2016). Further, a recent study indicated that different body fat distributions may make special contributions to 25(OH)D concentrations, as visceral adipose tissue (VAT) showed a closer correlation than abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (aSAT) or total body fat (TBF) (R. Rafiq et al., 2019). Two novel anthropometric indices, a body shape index (ABSI) and body roundness index (BRI) which were first published in 2012 and 2013, took body shape into account. The ABSI was calculated by standardizing waist circumference (WC) for height and BMI. Its inventors, Krakauer NY and Krakauer JC, have claimed that ABSI appeared to be significantly related to abdominal adipose tissue (AAT), and superior to BMI or WC for predicting premature death (Krakauer & Krakauer, 2012). The BRI, based on height and WC, was developed by Thomas DM et al. and considered an improved predictor of body fat and VAT (Thomas et al., 2013). To date, ABSI and BRI have been associated with a series of chronic diseases (Ji et al., 2018), while, to the best of our knowledge, there are only two studies relevant to 25(OH)D status. Both of the studies reported a positive association between the obesity‐related indices and lower vitamin D levels; however, further studies are still needed since their study sample only represented older Portuguese or southern Chinese adults, respectively (Sousa‐Santos et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2019). Thus, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the association between obesity‐related indices (ABSI, BMI and BRI) and serum 25(OH)D status and to examine the performance of these two new and one old indices of screening for low‐level 25(OH)D risk in Chinese adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

The data in this study were from the Chinese Urban Adults Diet and Health Study (CUADHS), which was a cross‐sectional study conducted from March to July 2016. As described in detail previously (Zhao et al., 2017), a multistage sampling method was adopted for participant recruitment. First, eight cities, including two first‐tier cities (Beijing, Guangzhou) and six nonfirst‐tier cities (Chengdu, Chenzhou, Jilin, Lanzhou, Wuhu and Xuchang), were purposively selected based on differences in geographical location and economic status. Second, a convenience sampling method was applied to select two communities in each first‐tier city or one in nonfirst‐tier cities, respectively. According to resident registration forms, potential participants were then randomly recruited via telephone by local trained health workers. The inclusion criteria were local residents or those who had lived in an urban area for more than one year. The exclusion criteria were subjects with disabilities, infectious or mental diseases, memory problems, or pregnant and lactating women. The sample size was calculated based on a formula for cross‐sectional study:where n was sample size required, α was significant level set as 0.05, p was estimated prevalence of vitamin D sufficiency (≥20 ng/ml) set as 0.3 (Lu et al., 2009), q was 1‐p, and d was the permissible error set as 0.1p. A minimum sample size of around 900 was calculated as the number needed to satisfy the requirements. Finally, a total of 1806 individuals were invited and 1739 were enrolled. The current analysis consisted of 1666 individuals as 43 were excluded due to the lack of a blood sample and a further 30 participants were excluded due to missing values of key variables (anthropometric information; education level; household monthly income).

Sociodemographic characteristics and lifestyle factors

Data on sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age, sex, education level, and household monthly income) and lifestyle factors (current smoking status, drinking status, physical activity over the last seven days, and use of vitamin D supplements) were collected by trained interviewers using a uniform questionnaire. Based on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (short version) (IPAQ group, 2005) used in the questionnaire, a continuous score expressed as metabolic equivalents of tasks (METs) was calculated and then transformed into tertiles, from the lowest to the highest and marked as the low, medium, and high groups of physical activity. According to the latitude, eight cities were divided into two groups: lower latitude (Chengdu, Chenzhou, Guangzhou, Lanzhou, Wuhu, and Xuchang) and higher latitude (Beijing and Jilin) than 37°.

Food consumption

Daily consumption of several food items in one recent month was calculated using a semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (semi‐FFQ), including cereals and potatoes, vegetables, fruits, meat and poultry, aquatic products, eggs, milk and dairy products, and soybeans and nuts. Standard reference picture books, bowls, plates, and spoons were used to assist the estimation of dietary intakes. To include food consumption into the multivariate analysis, we converted the continuous form of food consumption to a binary variable (deficiency or not), according to the Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents (version 2016) (Chinese Nutrition Association, 2016).

Obesity‐related indices

Height (m), weight (kg), and waist circumference (WC, m) were recorded by trained researchers or professional nurses using a standardized procedure and identical equipment. BMI, ABSI, and BRI were calculated according to the following formulas: According to the China overweight/obesity medical nutrition expert consensus (version 2016) (Drafting committee of Chinese consensus on overweight/obesity medical nutrition therapy, 2016), underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity were defined as a BMI < 18.5, 18.5–23.9, 24–27.9, and ≥ 28 kg/m2, respectively.

Serum 25(OH)D concentration

Fasting venous blood samples were drawn in the morning to assess serum 25(OH)D concentrations (25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3). All blood samples were transported to Beijing by cold chain and tested in a qualified laboratory (Lawke Health Laboratory, Beijing, China). Serum 25(OH)D was detected by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS), with lower limits of quantification of 2 and 1 ng/ml, via a high‐performance liquid chromatograph (Agilent 1,100; Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a mass spectrometer (API4000Q trap; AB SCIEX LLC., Redwood City, CA, USA). The deficiency, insufficiency, and sufficiency of 25(OH)D were identified according to the Application Guideline for Vitamin D and Bone Health in Adult Chinese (2014 Standard Edition) (Liao et al., 2014), with a concentration of < 12, 12–20 and ≥ 20 ng/ml, respectively.

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS version 22.0 (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and R 3.6.3 were used for statistical analysis. Categorical variables were described as proportions, and continuous BMI, ABSI, and BRI were presented as median (interquartile range, IQR) after normality tests. Chi‐squared analysis or Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for single factor analysis across different 25(OH)D status. Quartiles of ABSI and BRI were calculated by sex and marked as Q1–Q4 from the lowest to the highest. Multinomial logistic regressions were carried out to analyze the relationship between BMI, ABSI or BRI, and serum 25(OH)D deficiency or insufficiency, with the sufficiency group as the reference. The following confounders with a p ≤.10 of single factor analysis were included in the adjusted model: sex, age, education level, monthly household income, dietary intakes (vegetables, fruits, meat and poultry, aquatic products, and use of vitamin D supplements), current smoking and drinking status, physical activity, and latitude of survey points. Combing 25(OH)D deficiency and insufficiency into one group, multivariate binary logistic regressions were applied to calculate the predicted values. The values were then used to establish receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curves (AUCs) to estimate the prediction capability of three indices for low‐level serum 25(OH)D (<20 ng/ml). Further, the Delong test was used to compare the AUCs. Multivariate analyses mentioned above were also stratified by sex. In addition, to account for missing values, multiple imputation was performed using the mice package (Buuren & Groothuis‐Oudshoorn, 2011) in R software. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in which the main analyses were repeated with imputed data. The level of statistical significance in this study was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

Characteristics and 25(OH)D status of the study sample

A total of 1666 participants (34% men) were included in this study. The average age was 50.3 ± 17.4 years. Overall, the median level of serum 25(OH)D was 14.1 ng/ml (IQR 8.3). The percentage of adults with 25(OH)D deficiency or insufficiency was 37.5% (24.7% in men and 44.1% in women) and 43.1% (48.2% in men and 40.5% in women), respectively. However, only 8.5% reported intake of vitamin D supplements. Descriptive data are presented in Table 1. Among all the studied variables, sex, age, education level, monthly household income, dietary intakes (fruits, meat and poultry, aquatic products, and use of vitamin D supplements), current smoking and drinking status, physical activity, and the latitude of survey points were significantly relevant to 25(OH)D status (p <.05), as well as ABSI.
TABLE 1

Characteristics of the study sample by 25(OH)D status, n (%) or median (IQR)

Variables25(OH)D p value
Deficiency (n = 625)Insufficiency (n = 718)Sufficiency (n = 323)
Sex
Men140 (22.4)273 (38.0)153 (47.4) <.001
Women485 (77.6)445 (62.0)170 (52.6)
Age (years)
18 ~ 44303 (48.5)239 (33.3)78 (24.1) <.001
45 ~ 64191 (30.6)249 (34.7)120 (37.2)
≥65131 (21.0)230 (32.0)125 (38.7)
Education level
Secondary or under165 (26.4)249 (34.7)135 (41.8) <.001
High or equal303 (48.5)273 (38.0)109 (33.7)
Bachelor or above157 (25.1)196 (27.3)79 (24.5)
Household monthly income (RMB: yuan)
≤4,999336 (53.8)344 (47.9)155 (48.0) <.001
5000–9999210 (33.6)216 (30.1)98 (30.3)
≥10,00079 (12.6)158 (22.0)70 (21.7)
Dietary intakes
Cereals and potatoes < 250 g/day255 (40.8)283 (39.4)116 (35.9).342
Vegetables < 300 g/day331 (53.0)346 (48.2)147(45.5).063
Fruits < 200 g/day402 (64.3)490 (68.2)238 (73.7) .013
Meat and poultry < 40 g/day305 (48.8)232 (32.3)83 (25.7) <.001
Aquatic product < 40 g/day508 (81.3)548 (76.3)216 (66.9) <.001
Eggs < 40 g/day285 (45.6)320 (44.6)150 (46.4).841
Milk and dairy products < 300 g/day595 (95.2)668 (93.0)309 (95.7).121
Soybean and nuts < 25 g/day244 (39.0)278 (38.7)124 (38.4).980
Use of vitamin D supplementation38 (6.1)66 (9.2)37 (11.5) .012
Regular drinking144 (23.0)212 (29.5)106 (32.8) .002
Current smoking status
Smoker66 (10.6)95 (13.2)54 (16.7) .026
Never or quit smoking559 (89.4)623 (86.8)269 (83.3)
Physical activity
Low231 (37.0)216 (30.1)71 (22.0) <.001
Medium196 (31.4)211 (29.4)107 (33.1)
High153 (24.5)253 (35.2)126 (39.0)
Unable to determine45 (7.2)38 (5.3)19 (5.9)
Latitude of survey points
≤37°321 (51.4)584 (81.3)285 (88.2) <.001
>37°304 (48.6)134 (18.7)38 (11.8)
Obesity measurements (median (IQR))
BMI23.7 (4.8)23.4 (4.6)24.0 (4.6).107
ABSI0.078 (0.007)0.079 (0.007)0.079 (0.007) .002
BRI3.55 (1.9)3.61 (1.8)3.69 (1.6).721

Chi‐squared test was used for categorical variables and Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous non‐normal variables. Bold text represents a statistically significant difference (p <.05).

Characteristics of the study sample by 25(OH)D status, n (%) or median (IQR) Chi‐squared test was used for categorical variables and Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous non‐normal variables. Bold text represents a statistically significant difference (p <.05).

Multinomial logistic regressions for 25(OH)D status

After adjustment for possible influential factors (Table 2), no significant association was observed between BMI and 25(OH)D deficiency or insufficiency. Compared with Q1, participants in Q4 of ABSI and BRI were 2.334 and 2.215 times more likely to be in the 25(OH)D deficiency group. In terms of 25(OH)D insufficiency, only the ABSI was found to reach statistical significance. In sensitivity analyses conducted after multiple imputation, results were similar to the current analyses (Table S1).
TABLE 2

Association between BMI, ABSI, and BRI with serum 25(OH)D status, OR (95%CI)

IndicesSerum 25(OH)D
DeficiencyInsufficiency
Crude a Adjusted b Crude a Adjusted b
BMI categories
Under/normal weight1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)
Overweight0.826 (0.619–1.102)1.068 (0.763–1.494)0.759 (0.573–1.005)0.843 (0.626–1.133)
Obesity1.163 (0.739–1.830)1.393 (0.828–2.343)0.878 (0.557–1.386)0.996 (0.618–1.607)
p for trend.905.268.166.573
ABSI categories c
Q11.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)
Q21.325 (0.901–1.948)1.472 (0.946–2.291) 1.757 (1.199–2.573) 1.894 (1.269–2.826)
Q30.925 (0.646–1.325)1.255 (0.809–1.946)1.027 (0.716–1.473)1.267 (0.850–1.887)
Q41.071 (0.733–1.567) 2.334 (1.458–3.734) 1.676 (1.156–2.429) 2.372 (1.558–3.612)
p for trend.842 .002 .082 .001
BRI categories c
Q11.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)
Q21.202 (0.815–1.772)1.479 (0.945–2.316)1.204 (0.824–1.758)1.400 (0.937–2.090)
Q30.739 (0.510–1.069)0.977 (0.619–1.541)0.785 (0.549–1.123)0.931 (0.624–1.391)
Q41.285 (0.873–1.890) 2.215 (1.365–3.594) 1.139 (0.779–1.666)1.459 (0.945–2.252)
p for trend.702 .010 .890.297

Unadjusted.

Adjusted for sex, age, education level, monthly household income, dietary intakes (vegetables, fruits, meat and poultry, aquatic product, and use of vitamin D supplements), current smoking and drinking status, physical activity, and latitude of survey points.

Sex‐specific quartiles. Reference category was the group of 25(OH)D sufficiency. Bold text represents a statistically significant difference (p <.05).

Association between BMI, ABSI, and BRI with serum 25(OH)D status, OR (95%CI) Unadjusted. Adjusted for sex, age, education level, monthly household income, dietary intakes (vegetables, fruits, meat and poultry, aquatic product, and use of vitamin D supplements), current smoking and drinking status, physical activity, and latitude of survey points. Sex‐specific quartiles. Reference category was the group of 25(OH)D sufficiency. Bold text represents a statistically significant difference (p <.05). Further analysis stratified by sex is shown in Figure 1. Among men, a significantly increased prevalence of 25(OH)D deficiency was observed for all three indices. Among women, a significant association with 25(OH)D deficiency was also found for ABSI and BRI, but not for BMI. When it comes to 25(OH)D insufficiency, the results for men and women were both in line with the entire study population. No significant correlation was observed except for ABSI.
FIGURE 1

OR (95% CI) for BMI, ABSI, and BRI with 25(OH)D deficiency and insufficiency by sex. Results were derived from multinomial logistic regression analyses. All analyses were adjusted for age, education level, monthly household income, dietary intakes (vegetables, fruits, meat and poultry, aquatic product, and use of vitamin D supplements), current smoking and drinking status, physical activity, and latitude of survey points

OR (95% CI) for BMI, ABSI, and BRI with 25(OH)D deficiency and insufficiency by sex. Results were derived from multinomial logistic regression analyses. All analyses were adjusted for age, education level, monthly household income, dietary intakes (vegetables, fruits, meat and poultry, aquatic product, and use of vitamin D supplements), current smoking and drinking status, physical activity, and latitude of survey points

Multivariate ROC analyses for 25(OH)D

To predict a lower level of serum 25(OH)D (combining 25(OH)D deficiency and insufficiency into one group), ROCs of each anthropometric index were established using the predicted values based on binary logistic regressions, after adjusting for a series of possible influential factors (Figure 2). Overall, models with ABSI showed the largest AUCs among the three indices, while no significant difference was found. When stratified by sex, the AUCs of ABSI were significantly larger than that of BMI in men. However, no significant difference was observed in women (Table 3).
FIGURE 2

ROCs of BMI, ABSI, and BRI to identify low‐level 25(OH)D by sex. (a) Men; (b) women. ROCs were based on binary logistic regression adjusted for age, education level, monthly household income, dietary intakes (vegetables, fruits, meat and poultry, aquatic product, and use of vitamin D supplements), current smoking and drinking status, physical activity, and latitude of survey points. Areas for the curves are shown in Table 3

TABLE 3

AUCs of BMI, ABSI, and BRI for the presence of low‐level 25(OH)D in men and women

IndicesAllMenWomen
AUC95%CIAUC95%CIAUC95%CI
BMI0.716a 0.687–0.7460.695a 0.649–0.7410.722a 0.682–0.761
ABSI0.725a 0.695–0.7550.731b 0.687–0.7740.723a 0.683–0.762
BRI0.720a 0.690–0.7500.715ab 0.668–0.7610.720a 0.681–0.760

Receiver operating characteristic curves were based on binary logistic regression. Delong test was used to compare the AUCs. Different letters in same column indicate significant differences between groups (p <.05).

ROCs of BMI, ABSI, and BRI to identify low‐level 25(OH)D by sex. (a) Men; (b) women. ROCs were based on binary logistic regression adjusted for age, education level, monthly household income, dietary intakes (vegetables, fruits, meat and poultry, aquatic product, and use of vitamin D supplements), current smoking and drinking status, physical activity, and latitude of survey points. Areas for the curves are shown in Table 3 AUCs of BMI, ABSI, and BRI for the presence of low‐level 25(OH)D in men and women Receiver operating characteristic curves were based on binary logistic regression. Delong test was used to compare the AUCs. Different letters in same column indicate significant differences between groups (p <.05).

DISCUSSION

Our study revealed that vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency were severe in Chinese adults, and the frequency of milk and dairy product or vitamin D supplement intake was also low. Despite the existence of gender heterogeneity, lower vitamin D levels may be one of the potential adverse consequences of obesity, supported by the significant associations between BMI, ABSI, and BRI with 25(OH)D found in this cross‐sectional study. Among these three indices, the ABSI showed a superior predictive ability for identifying low‐level serum 25(OH)D. Using a method of radio‐labeling, the correlation between vitamin D and obesity was first reported in rats as early as in 1971, which suggested that vitamin D3 might be primarily stored in the adipose tissue (Rosenstreich et al., 1971). Since then, extensive research work has been carried out in different populations, of which BMI is the most commonly used anthropometric index to define obesity (Pourshahidi, 2015; Rafiq & Jeppesen, 2018; Saneei et al., 2013). Related systematic reviews and meta‐analyses were first published by Saneei et al., 2013, and a significant but weak association was reported, but not for women living in developing countries (Saneei et al., 2013), while in some other studies, the relation was stronger in women or did not exist (Bolland et al., 2007; Vanlint et al., 2011; Zhu et al., 2019). The discrepancies in published studies might be partly due to different study populations (developmental status, culture, lifestyle, diet, etc.), BMI groups, detections and definitions of the 25(OH)D status, residual confounders, and so on. Two novel indices, ABSI and BRI, that took body shape into account were also applied in recent studies and have been implicated in a series of chronic diseases, including diabetes, cardiometabolic abnormalities (CMA), metabolic syndrome, and hyperuricemia (Calton et al., 2015; Ji et al., 2018; Kuk et al., 2005; Pradhan, 2014; Slagter et al., 2017). However, to the best of our knowledge, only two articles published at the present are related to serum vitamin D. Sousa‐Santos, A.R., et al. were the first to report that higher BRI and ABSI were associated with lower serum 25(OH)D (Q1) in older adults in Portugal (Sousa‐Santos et al., 2018). Another study conducted in central southern China by Zhu X‐L et al. founded that lower 25(OH)D (<30 ng/ml) was linked with increases odds of the highest quartile group of ABSI and BRI only in men (Zhu et al., 2019). In line with Sousa‐Santos, A.R. and Zhu X‐L et al.’s results (Sousa‐Santos et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2019), we did find strong relationships between obesity‐related indices and 25(OH)D: Compared with Q1, Q4 of ABSI and BRI had a significantly higher risk of 25(OH)D deficiency in both men and women. When 25(OH)D insufficiency was used as outcomes, the significant association was observed only with ABSI. However, the serum 25(OH)D deficiency was related to BMI only in men in our study. These results might be a potentially evidence to understand how differences between indices may relate to 25(OH)D levels. As a traditional index, BMI was a good predictor of TBF, but its ability to distinguish fat from muscle and reflect fat distribution was limited (Aly et al., 2016). On the other hand, growing studies indicated that both ABSI and BRI showed a better ability to identify AAT or VAT (Krakauer & Krakauer, 2012; Thomas et al., 2013). In addition, recent studies revealed that the gender difference in body fat distribution should also be considered. Computed tomography measurements showed that, for a given TBF, men tended to have significantly more VAT or hepatic fat than women (Bawadi et al., 2019; Gomez‐Peralta et al., 2018). For a given WC, men had less total abdominal adipose tissue (TAAT) or aSAT than did women (Tian et al., 2016). A further study by Rafiq et al. (2019) indicated a gender difference whereby VAT and TBF were found to be associated with 25(OH)D in women, whereas VAT and hepatic fat showed the same association in men. Among all the fat deposits, VAT showed the strongest associations, which might be due to its metabolic activity of secreting proinflammatory adipokines (Rafiq et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2016). These underlying mechanisms may at least in part explain the lack of association between BMI and 25(OH)D in women in our study. In addition, we applied multivariate ROC analyses to compare the ability of these three anthropometric indices of screening 25(OH)D deficiency or insufficiency for the first time, and the models with ABSI showed the highest value of AUC, even though they were not very high. Gender stratification revealed that the difference was more pronounced in men than in women. Multivariate ROC analyses of these indices were also used previously for the prediction of hyperuricemia, while ABSI showed the lowest value (around 0.580) in both men and women (Calton et al., 2015). However, comparability between these studies is limited as the outcomes vary. Further studies are still needed to make up for the paucity of serum vitamin D studies. Although our study provides interesting results, it was not possible to verify the temporal sequence between exposure and outcome due to the cross‐sectional study design, so a causal inference cannot be established. Considering the evidence of several interventional studies that higher BMI did negatively influence the response to supplemental vitamin D (Pourshahidi, 2015), in this study we tended to assume that vitamin D deficiency is a kind of malnutrition within morbidly obese population, while some researchers hypothesized that it is the cause of obesity (Foss, 2009; Mansouri et al., 2019; Mathieu et al., 2018). Despite the growing body of evidence, no prospective or randomized controlled studies are currently available that address the regulation of ABSI or BRI on serum 25(OH)D. Additionally, the strength of association varied among previous studies. There remains much need for further elucidation. Several other limitations should also be mentioned. Although we have adjusted for multiple confounding factors, daily dietary vitamin D intakes were not been obtained due to data limitations. Nor did we have baseline data on indoor/outdoor work or the season of sampling, which could be related to sun exposure and thereby levels of vitamin D. Nonetheless, it must be kept in mind that anthropometric indices are not true measures of body distribution. In addition to the fat distribution mentioned earlier, recent study has suggested that vitamin D levels are associated with muscle mass (Hassan‐Smith et al., 2017), which indicated that the type of obesity (sarcopenic/nonsarcopenic) potentially confounded study results. Future studies combined with imaging diagnostic methods, such as magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography, will contribute to clarifying the associations and promoting the clinical application of these indices.

CONCLUSION

A positive association between obesity and lower 25(OH)D serum concentration was found among Chinese adults. Besides BMI, novel obesity‐related indicator, ABSI and BRI were associated with lower serum 25(OH)D to some extent, and further studies are needed to clarify their potential to be used as screening tools in clinical practice.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

ETHICAL STATEMENT

The study conforms to the Declaration of Helsinki and does not embrace any human or animal testing. The study's protocols and procedures were ethically reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Research Board of Peking University (No. IRB00001052‐15059). Written informed consent from every participant had been obtained and documented. Table S1 Click here for additional data file.
  40 in total

1.  Volumetric dilution, rather than sequestration best explains the low vitamin D status of obesity.

Authors:  Andjela T Drincic; Laura A G Armas; Eileen E Van Diest; Robert P Heaney
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 2.  Obesity and vitamin D deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Pereira-Santos; P R F Costa; A M O Assis; C A S T Santos; D B Santos
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  A Body Shape Index and Body Roundness Index: Two new body indices for detecting association between obesity and hyperuricemia in rural area of China.

Authors:  Naijin Zhang; Ye Chang; Xiaofan Guo; Yintao Chen; Ning Ye; Yingxian Sun
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.487

4.  Associations of vitamin D with novel and traditional anthropometric indices according to age and sex: a cross-sectional study in central southern China.

Authors:  Xiao-Ling Zhu; Zhi-Heng Chen; Ying Li; Ping-Ting Yang; Lei Liu; Liu-Xin Wu; Ya-Qin Wang
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Sex, BMI and age differences in metabolic syndrome: the Dutch Lifelines Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sandra N Slagter; Robert P van Waateringe; André P van Beek; Melanie M van der Klauw; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Jana V van Vliet-Ostaptchouk
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.335

6.  Body Shape Index Is a Stronger Predictor of Diabetes.

Authors:  Hiba Bawadi; Merna Abouwatfa; Sara Alsaeed; Abdelhamid Kerkadi; Zumin Shi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Association between 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Status and Components of Body Composition and Glucose Metabolism in Older Men and Women.

Authors:  Svea-Vivica Mathieu; Karina Fischer; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Gregor Freystaetter; Felix Beuschlein; Simeon Schietzel; Andreas Egli; Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  A New Light on Vitamin D in Obesity: A Novel Association with Trimethylamine-N-Oxide (TMAO).

Authors:  Luigi Barrea; Giovanna Muscogiuri; Giuseppe Annunziata; Daniela Laudisio; Giulia de Alteriis; Gian Carlo Tenore; Annamaria Colao; Silvia Savastano
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Effect of exercise on serum vitamin D and tissue vitamin D receptors in experimentally induced type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Yosria E Aly; Azza S Abdou; Mona M Rashad; Menatallah M Nassef
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 10.479

10.  25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 exert distinct effects on human skeletal muscle function and gene expression.

Authors:  Zaki K Hassan-Smith; Carl Jenkinson; David J Smith; Ivan Hernandez; Stuart A Morgan; Nicola J Crabtree; Neil J Gittoes; Brian G Keevil; Paul M Stewart; Martin Hewison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Relationship Between Serum Vitamin D and Perirenal Fat Thickness in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome in Community.

Authors:  Hong-Xia Zhang; Lu Zhai; Zhixiang Gao; Jie Yuan
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.249

2.  Serum levels of vitamin D, retinol, zinc, and CRP in relation to obesity among children and adolescents.

Authors:  Yan Zou; Ronghua Zhang; Lichun Huang; Dong Zhao; Danting Su; Jia Meng; Yueqiang Fang
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.175

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.