Literature DB >> 31067681

Body Shape Index Is a Stronger Predictor of Diabetes.

Hiba Bawadi1, Merna Abouwatfa2, Sara Alsaeed3, Abdelhamid Kerkadi4, Zumin Shi5.   

Abstract

Anthropometric indicators can predict the development of diabetes among adults. Among them, a new indicator (Body Shape Index) was developed. Several cohort observational studies have demonstrated that A Body Shape Index (ABSI) is a prominent indicator for mortality and morbidity. Nevertheless, the predictive level of ABSI for diabetes varied among different ethnicities. This study aimed to assess the predictive level of ABSI for diabetes compared to BMI in the Qatari population. Date from 2536 Qatari adults aged 20-79 years attending the Qatar Biobank Study were used. Body height, weight, and waist circumference were measured. Blood samples were measured for glucose. The association between ABSI, BMI, and diabetes was assessed using a logistic regression. Both ABSI and BMI were positively associated with diabetes after adjusting for potential confounding factors. ABSI had a stronger association with diabetes than BMI. Per 1 SD increment of ABSI and BMI, the z-score had an odds ratios of 1.85 (1.54-2.23) and 1.34 (1.18-1.51) for diabetes, respectively. ABSI and BMI are significantly associated with diabetes in the Qatari population. ABSI is a better predictor for the risk of diabetes than BMI after the adjustment for age, gender, education, and physical activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABSI; BMI; Diabetes; Qatar Biobank

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31067681      PMCID: PMC6566958          DOI: 10.3390/nu11051018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrients        ISSN: 2072-6643            Impact factor:   5.717


1. Introduction

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is high among Qatari adults reaching 16.7% [1]. The progression of type 2 diabetes is accompanied with several complications such as neuropathy, retinopathy, cardiovascular disease, infections (e.g., monilial skin infections), and cognitive impairment [2]. The increase in the Type 2 diabetes prevalence is associated with a change in sedentary life style and obesity [3]. Different researches demonstrated that obesity, particularly abdominal obesity (AO), which represents both subcutaneous and visceral fat accumulation, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases in both adults and children [4]. It is well-known that obesity is linked with insulin resistance, which plays an important role in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and other metabolic disorders [5,6]. Body mass index (BMI) is a widely accepted and easily applicable measure for obesity; it, however, cannot distinguish between fat and fat-free mass. Therefore, an elevated BMI might not necessarily reflect an increased adiposity [7]. To overcome this weakness, waist circumference (WC) has been used as indicators of abdominal obesity and is closely related to noncommunicable diseases [8,9]. It has been shown that an excess of WC is associated with an increase in the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and the risk of premature death even when BMI is within a normal range [10]. It was also reported that the association between insulin resistance and WC is better than that with BMI [11,12]. In 2012, Krakauer and Krakauer developed a new tool called a body shape index (ABSI) that accompanies waist circumference, height, and weight [13]. According to the authors, ABSI emphasizes the elevated risk of diseases related to central and general adiposity. Therefore, ABSI is capable of depicting a crucial risk factor for premature mortality [13]. ABSI showed a predictive power to the risk of CVD and cancer [14]. ABSI can estimate both visceral abdominal and general overall adiposities and can predict premature mortality better than WC and BMI [15]. ABSI has been validated to predict the risk of diabetes in several countries. However, the findings are mixed. Some studies suggest that ABSI is a better predictor for diabetes [16,17]. However, other studies showed ABSI is not a better predictor of diabetes than BMI [18]. The aim of this study is to assess the predictive level of ABSI for diabetes compared to BMI in the Qatari population. We also aimed to assess the interaction between ABSI and BMI in relation to diabetes.

2. Methodology

2.1. Study Design

The study is a population-based cross-sectional survey carried out between 2012–2014 for 60,000 men and women Qatari nationals and long-term residents (individuals living in the country for ≥15 years) (Qatar Biobank study); the detailed methods of data collection and sampling has been published elsewhere [19]. Exclusion criteria were a history of terminating diseases such as muscle wasting, athletes, age <20 or >79, and pregnant women. A random sample of 2802 adults aged 20–79 years was obtained from the Qatar Biobank survey data. Participants with incomplete measurements were excluded (n = 266). The final number of participants included in this analysis was 2536 (1275 males and 1261 females). Qatar Biobank recruitment and data collection protocols were approved by the Hamad Medical Corporation Ethics Committee. The Institutional Review Board approval for this study was obtained from Qatar Biobank.

2.2. Outcome Variable Diabetes

Diabetes was defined as having fasting glucose ≥7 mmol/dL, random glucose ≥11.1 mmol/dL, HbA1c >6.5%, or self-reported doctor diagnosed diabetes [20]. Anthropometric measurements including weight, height, and waist circumference were measured by competent registered nurses in Qatar Biobank clinics. The participants were asked to wear light clothing and to be barefoot. The weight was measured by kg and recorded to the closest 0.1 kg. The standing and sitting height were measured and recorded to the closest 0.1 cm with the subject’s head in the Frankfurt plane. The waist circumference (WC) was measured at the midpoint between the last rib and the top of the iliac crest with stretch-resistant tape; the participants stood with their feet close together, arms positioned on the side. The weight and height measures were used to calculate body mass index (BMI, kg/m2). The BMI status (normal, overweight, and obese) of the participants were assigned based on WHO BMI cutoff points [21]. DEXA-Full Body iDXA (GE) scan-scanners were used in measuring the body distribution of visceral and trunk fat. It works by passing a low dose of x-ray radiation that goes on the whole body of participants who were directed not to wear anything that might interfere with the x-ray of the device like metal belts or jewelry. They were asked to wear a gown and to lie flat on the screening for about 5 to 10 min, and for clear not blurry Full Body iDXA (GE) scan images, participants were asked to hold still without moving and to hold their breath for a few seconds. A body shape index (ABSI) was calculated using the Krakauer and Krakauer equation: WC/(BMI2/3height1/2) [13]. The ABSI score was converted to a z-score using the following equation: ABSI minus ABSImean divided by ABSISD. BMI was also converted to z-score. The z score was used to measure the association of ABSI compared with BMI and the risk of diabetes. The z-score was used as it makes the comparison meaningful because the unit change in the regression analysis is different for ABSI and BMI.

2.3. Covariates

The education level, age, and physical activity of the participants were obtained through a main questionnaire. Education was divided into three levels: Low education (up to secondary school), medium education (technical or professional school), and high education (university and above). Leisure time physical activity levels (expressed as metabolic equivalents (MET) (hours/week) were calculated based on the frequency and duration of different types of physical activity.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The association between ABSI z-scores and diabetes was assessed using a logistic regression. Four models were used: model 1 adjusted for age and gender; model 2 further adjusted for education; model 3 further adjusted for physical activity; model 4 further adjusted for BMI. The association between BMI (z-score) and diabetes was also assessed using the same approach. Subgroup analyses were conducted and visually presented using a user-written syntax ipdover in Stata. All the analyses were conducted in Stata 15.1. A p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the sample characteristics by gender. The mean age was 38.3 in males and 40.1 in females. More than 60% of the participants had a high education level. The prevalence of obesity was 39% (32.6% in men and 45.4% in women). Females had higher mean BMI and total fat mean than males. Males had higher waist circumference and visceral fat (p < 0.001). Sample characteristics by incidence of diabetes is presented Table S1.
Table 1

Sample characteristics by gender.

TotalMaleFemalep-Value
n = 2536n = 1275n = 1261
Age (years)39.4 (11.1)38.8 (10.6)40.1 (11.6)0.004
Education <0.001
Low251 (9.9%)94 (7.4%)157 (12.5%)
Medium707 (27.9%)388 (30.5%)319 (25.3%)
High1576 (62.2%)791 (62.1%)785 (62.3%)
BMI (kg/m2)29.0 (5.6)28.4 (5.0)29.6 (6.1)<0.001
BMI categories <0.001
Normal603 (23.8%)316 (24.8%)287 (22.8%)
Overweight944 (37.2%)543 (42.6%)401 (31.8%)
Obese989 (39.0%)416 (32.6%)573 (45.4%)
Waist circumference (cm)89.2 (13.5)93.5 (12.4)84.8 (13.2)<0.001
ABSI z score0.0 (1.0)0.7 (0.7)−0.7 (0.7)<0.001
Total mass (kg)79.3 (16.3)84.3 (15.2)73.5 (15.7)<0.001
Total fat (kg)30.9 (10.7)28.6 (10.3)33.4 (10.6)<0.001
Trunk fat (kg)16.2 (6.4)16.2 (6.6)16.2 (6.2)0.90
Visceral fat (kg)1.0 (0.7)1.3 (0.8)0.8 (0.5)<0.001
Leisure time physical activity (MET hours/week)18.2 (38.6)22.4 (45.3)13.9 (29.8)<0.001
Diabetes (%)413 (16.3%)191 (15.0%)222 (17.6%)0.073

The data are presented as mean (SD) for continuous measures and n (%) for categorical measures.

Table 2 shows the association between ABSI and BMI with diabetes using different logistic regression models with progressive adjustments. After adjusting for age and gender, both ABSI and BMI were positively associated with diabetes with an OR (95% CI) of 1.84 (1.54–2.21) and 1.38 (1.22–1.56) respectively. With a further adjustment for education, the OR for the risk of diabetes with ABSI z-scores was 1.87 (95% CI: 1.55–2.24), whereas the OR for the association between the risk of diabetes and BMI z-scores was 1.34 (95% CI: 1.55–1.19–1.52). After being mutually adjusted for ABSI and BMI, the ORs for diabetes increased for both ABSI 1.94 (95% CI: 1.61–2.34) and BMI 1.40 (95% CI: 1.24–1.60). The association between ABSI, BMI and HbA1c was assessed using a multivariable regression model where both indices were independently associated with HbA1c (refer to Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials).
Table 2

The association between A Body Shape Index (ABSI) and BMI with diabetes among Qatari adults.

ABSI z-Score BMI z-Score
OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
Model 11.84 (1.54–2.21)<0.0011.38 (1.22–1.56)<0.001
Model 21.87 (1.55–2.24)<0.0011.34 (1.19–1.52)<0.001
Model 31.85 (1.54–2.23)<0.0011.34 (1.18–1.51)<0.001
Model 41.94 (1.61–2.34)<0.0011.40 (1.24–1.60)<0.001

Model 1 adjusted for age and gender; Model 2 further adjusted for education; Model 3 further adjusted for physical activity; Model 4 further adjusted for the BMI z-score or ABSI z-score.

Figure 1 represents subgroup analyses of the association between ABSI and diabetes. There was a significant interaction between gender and ABSI in relation to diabetes. The association between ABSI and diabetes was stronger in women than in men. ABSI and diabetes were associated in all subgroups of age ≥30. The highest association were observed in the second age (30–39 years) subgroup (p < 0.001). Participants with a normal weight did not show a significant association between ABSI and diabetes while overweight and obese did (p < 0.001); however, obese participants showed the highest association between ABSI and diabetes (p < 0.001). As BMI became higher, the OR gradient for diabetes associated with ABSI also became higher. The OR for diabetes associated with ABSI were 1.24, 1.79, and 2.20 among normal, overweight, and obese participants.
Figure 1

Subgroup analyses of the association between ABSI and diabetes.

4. Discussion

This cross-sectional study assessed the predictive power of ABSI and BMI on predicting the risk of diabetes in the Qatari population. It was found in the current study that ABSI is associated with a risk of diabetes to a greater extent as compared to BMI. Han et al. (2017) compared the predictive level of a body shape index (ABSI) to other anthropometric parameters including body mass index (BMI), waist to height ratio (WHtR), and waist circumference (WC) for the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in chinses adults [22]. After adjusting for different cofounding variables, ABSI differentiated between the cases and non-cases of diabetes; however, there was no difference in the predictive ability for T2DM when using ABSI or other anthropometric parameters [22]. Fujita and colleagues (2015) conducted a prospective cohort study aimed at addressing whether ABSI could be used as a predictor for the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus and other chronic disease [23]. Researchers used annual health examination data (2008 to 2012) from Chiba City Hall in Japan. Their study included 37581 nondiabetic subjects followed up for 4 years. An increased BMI, WC, and ABSI elevated the risk of T2DM. Furthermore, the areas under the curve associated with ABSI regression models were smaller than that for BMI or WC models, which indicates that ABSI may not a stronger predictor for diabetes among Japanese population [23]. Similar findings were reported from an analysis of data from an 11-year follow-up study [24]. The authors reported that ABSI was an inferior discriminator of incident T2DM as compared to BMI and other anthropometric measures. Interestingly, we found that the joint effect of BMI and ABSI is a better predicator for the risk of diabetes than the ABSI and BMI alone. This finding is in line with a recent retrospective study about the association between Body Shape Index (ABSI) with cardio-metabolic risk factors [16]. The study was conducted on 6081 Caucasian adults. Generalized linear models (GLM) were used to assess both sex and age and the adjusted association of the ABSI with binary and continuous cardio-metabolic risk factors. The results showed that the joint contribution of BMI and ABSI produced significantly improved associations for having a high fasting glucose, high triglycerides, and a low HDL but not high blood pressure [16].

5. Conclusions

ABSI and BMI are significantly associated with diabetes in the Qatari population. ABSI is a better predictor for the risk of diabetes than BMI after the adjustment for age, gender, education, and physical activity.
  23 in total

1.  The cost of diabetes Type II in Europe: the CODE-2 Study.

Authors:  M Massi-Benedetti
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Body mass index, waist circumference, and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: implications for routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Silke Feller; Heiner Boeing; Tobias Pischon
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  [The value and limitations of the body mass index (BMI) in the assessment of the health risks of overweight and obesity].

Authors:  P Kok; J C Seidell; A E Meinders
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2004-11-27

Review 4.  The links between insulin resistance, diabetes, and cancer.

Authors:  Etan Orgel; Steven D Mittelman
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Body mass index, waist circumference, and risk of coronary heart disease: a prospective study among men and women.

Authors:  Alan J Flint; Kathryn M Rexrode; Frank B Hu; Robert J Glynn; Hervé Caspard; Joann E Manson; Walter C Willett; Eric B Rimm
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.

Authors:  J Tuomilehto; J Lindström; J G Eriksson; T T Valle; H Hämäläinen; P Ilanne-Parikka; S Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; M Laakso; A Louheranta; M Rastas; V Salminen; M Uusitupa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Determining the waist circumference in african americans which best predicts insulin resistance.

Authors:  Anne E Sumner; Sabyasachi Sen; Madia Ricks; Barbara A Frempong; Nancy G Sebring; Harvey Kushner
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  International Day for the Evaluation of Abdominal Obesity (IDEA): a study of waist circumference, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus in 168,000 primary care patients in 63 countries.

Authors:  Beverley Balkau; John E Deanfield; Jean-Pierre Després; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Keith A A Fox; Sidney C Smith; Philip Barter; Chee-Eng Tan; Luc Van Gaal; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Christine Massien; Steven M Haffner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030.

Authors:  J E Shaw; R A Sicree; P Z Zimmet
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 5.602

10.  A new body shape index predicts mortality hazard independently of body mass index.

Authors:  Nir Y Krakauer; Jesse C Krakauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  Relationship Between Modified Body Adiposity Index and A Body Shape Index with Biochemical Parameters in Bariatric Surgery Candidates.

Authors:  Negar Zamaninour; Hastimansooreh Ansar; Abdolreza Pazouki; Ali Kabir
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Association Between the Cardiometabolic Index and Hyperuricemia in an Asymptomatic Population with Normal Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Yu-Qiang Zuo; Zhi-Hong Gao; Yu-Ling Yin; Xu Yang; Ping-Yong Feng
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-11-23

3.  Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis from DXA Scan and Retinal Images Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Hamada R H Al-Absi; Mohammad Tariqul Islam; Mahmoud Ahmed Refaee; Muhammad E H Chowdhury; Tanvir Alam
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Issue of Waist Circumference for the Diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome Regarding Arterial Stiffness: Possible Utility of a Body Shape Index in Middle-Aged Nonobese Japanese Urban Residents Receiving Health Screening.

Authors:  Daiji Nagayama; Yasuhiro Watanabe; Takashi Yamaguchi; Kenji Suzuki; Atsuhito Saiki; Kentaro Fujishiro; Kohji Shirai
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.807

5.  Association of Region-Specific Cardiac Adiposity With Dysglycemia and New-Onset Diabetes.

Authors:  Kuo-Tzu Sung; Jen-Yuan Kuo; Chun-Ho Yun; Yueh-Hung Lin; Jui-Peng Tsai; Chi-In Lo; Chih-Chung Hsiao; Yau-Huei Lai; Cheng-Ting Tsai; Charles Jia-Yin Hou; Cheng-Huang Su; Hung-I Yeh; Chen-Yen Chien; Ta-Chuan Hung; Chung-Lieh Hung
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.106

6.  A Linear Relationship Between a Body Shape Index and Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis Based on a Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Jing-Jing Tong; Yong-Tong Cao; Jing-Hua Li
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.168

7.  Anthropometry, Body Composition and Resting Energy Expenditure in Human.

Authors:  Josep A Tur; Maria Del Mar Bibiloni
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist-to-hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?

Authors:  Tunay Kiremitli; Sevil Kiremitli; Pasa Ulug; Kemal Dinc; Kemine Uzel; Yusuf Kemal Arslan
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-05-21

9.  Predicting value of five anthropometric measures in metabolic syndrome among Jiangsu Province, China.

Authors:  Ting Tian; Jingxian Zhang; Qianrang Zhu; Wei Xie; Yuanyuan Wang; Yue Dai
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  A Body shape index significantly predicts MRI-defined abdominal adipose tissue depots in non-obese Asian Indians with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Shajith Anoop; Jesse Krakauer; Nir Krakauer; Anoop Misra
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.