| Literature DB >> 33841517 |
Azadeh Fatahi1, Reihaneh Malakooti1, Mohsen Shahlaei2.
Abstract
With a facile solvothermal technique, synthesis and application of Fe3O4@Entities:
Keywords: Carbamazepine; Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV); Electrochemistry; Fe3O4@PPy–CuII composite Microspheres
Year: 2020 PMID: 33841517 PMCID: PMC8019870 DOI: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.13922.11993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Scheme 1The preparation process of Fe3O4@PPy–CuII
Figure 1(a) SEM images of Fe3O4; (b) TEM images of Fe3O4@PPy; (c) TEM images of Fe3O4@PPy–CuII
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of (a) Fe3O4 (b) Fe3O4@PPy and, (c) Fe3O4@PPy–CuII.
Figure 3XRD patterns of (a) Fe3O4; (b) Fe3O4@PPy and (c) Fe3O4@PPy–CuII.
Figure 4TGA curve of the as-prepared Fe3O4@PPy–CuII microspheres
Figure 5XPS spectra of (a) Fe3O4@PPy–CuII; (b) Cu 2p of Fe3O4@PPy–CuII
Figure 6SEM images of: (a) CPE, (b), CILE and (c) Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE
Figure 7EIS for (a) CPE, (b) CILE (c) Fe3O4/CILE (d) Fe3O4@PPy /CILE/ and Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE (e) in 1 mM (Fe(CN)6)3-/4- with 0.1 M KCl
Figure 8Cyclic voltammograms s of 1 mM (Fe(CN)6 )3-/4- in 0.1 M KCl at various scan rates (a-i) (10-250 mV s-1) on Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE (a) and CILE (c); The slope of Ipa vs. v1/2 for 1 mM (Fe(CN)6 )3-/4- on Fe3O4@PPy–CuII /CILE (b) and CILE (d).
Figure 9Cyclic voltammograms for 100 μM CBZ at scan rate 100 mV s-1 at CPE (a); CILE (b); Fe3O4/CILE (c); Fe3O4@PPy/CILE (d) and Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE (e) in B-R buffer
Figure 10(a) Cyclic voltammograms of 100 μM CBZ at Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE in B-R buffer at different scan rates. The numbers of 1–8 correspond to 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150 and 200 mVs−1, respectively. (b) Variation of the peak current with square root of scan rate (υ 1/2); (c) Variation of the the logarithmic peak currents vs. the logarithmic scan rate, and (d) plot of (Epa–E0) and the logarithmic scan rate
Figure 11Chronoamperograms obtained at the Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE in the presence of 300, 400, 500 and 600 μM CBZ in in B-R buffer. Inset) Cottrell's plot for the data from the chronoamperograms
Figure 12Cyclic voltammograms of 100 μM CBZ at Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE in B-R buffer recorded (a) from pH 1.0 to 6.0 at a scan rate of 100 mVs−1 (b) effect of pH of CBZ solutions on peak potential
Figure 13Differential pulse voltammograms of Fe3O4@PPy–CuII/CILE in B-R buffer containing different concentrations of CBZ in the ranges 0.05–25 μM. Inset: Plot of the peak current against concentration of CBZ
A comparison of analysis parameters of CBZ with recently reported reference
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.03 | 5–100 | Au/graphene–AuNPs/GCE | |
| 0.029 | 0.05–3 | ERGO–SWCNT/GCE | |
| 0.092 | 0.5–100 | Fe–SnO2/SPCE | |
| 0.04 | 0.05–100 | MWCNT/GCE | |
| 0.016 | 0.15-100 | Fullerene-C60/GCE | |
| 3.89 | 84.6–846 | Graphite/GCE | |
| This work | 0.032 | 0.05 – 30 | Fe3O4/PANI–CuII/CILE |
Determination of CBZ in body fluids using the proposed method
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | Not detected | 0 |
|
| 1.6 | 101 | 3.05 ± 0.05 | 3 | |
| 2.7 | 102 | 5.1 ± 0.14 | 5 | |
| 3.2 | 97.5 | 9.75 ± 0.32 | 10 | |
| - | Not detected | 0 |
| |
| 2.8 | 95 | 2.85 ± 0.07 | 3 | |
| 2.2 | 101 | 4.9 ± 0.11 | 5 | |
| 2.3 | 104 | 10.2 ± 0.24 | 10 |