| Literature DB >> 33841129 |
Frances Theunissen1,2, Ryan S Anderton1,3,4, Frank L Mastaglia1,3, Loren L Flynn1,2,3, Samantha J Winter1,4, Ian James5, Richard Bedlack6, Stuart Hodgetts1,7, Sue Fletcher2,3, Steve D Wilton1,2,3, Nigel G Laing8, Mandi MacShane8, Merrilee Needham2,9,10, Ann Saunders11, Alan Mackay-Sim1,12, Ze'ev Melamed13,14, John Ravits15, Don W Cleveland13,14,16, P Anthony Akkari1,2,3,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There is a critical need to establish genetic markers that explain the complex phenotypes and pathogenicity of ALS. This study identified a polymorphism in the Stathmin-2 gene and investigated its association with sporadic ALS (sALS) disease risk, age-of onset and survival duration.Entities:
Keywords: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; genetic association studies; genetic marker; genetic variant; motor neuron disease; stathmin-2; structural variation
Year: 2021 PMID: 33841129 PMCID: PMC8033025 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.658226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
FIGURE 1Identification and characterization of CA repeat polymorphism in STMN2. (A) Schematic of the STMN2 primary transcript and the location of the CA repeat. (B) Sanger sequencing confirming size and variability of CA alleles. (C) Representation of STMN2 CA alleles from capillary separation genotyping assay. The blue peaks depict the fluorescent signal intensity with the allele peaks to determine genotype indicated by the black star. (D) Predicted in silico pre-mRNA structure for STMN2 reference sequence (NC_000008.11) generated from RNAfold Web server. The image depicts the predicted structure spanning from base pairs (79636317–79643806) with the red box indicating the portion of the pre-mRNA containing the variable CA repeat.
Demographics of study participants used for case-control association.
| Duke cases ( | Coriell cases ( | Combined cohort ( | Controls ( | |
| Males | 82 | 92 | 174 | 167 |
| Age (years) | 57.3 (12.1) | 56.8 (12.6) | 57.0 (12.4) | 55.6 (16.9) |
| Females | 70 | 77 | 147 | 165 |
| Age (years) | 57.8 (11.9) | 60.4 (13.4) | 58.0 (12.6) | 57.7 (13.9) |
| Age of onset | 57.5 (12.0) | 55.8 (13.7) | 56.6 (12.9) | – |
| Disease duration (mths) | 52.4 (38.1) | – | – | – |
Distribution of CA genotypes in North American sALS and control cohorts.
| Genotype | sALS | Controls | OR | 95% CI | |
| Long/long (L/L) | 203 (63.2%) | 183 (55.1%) | 1.4 | 1.02–1.92 | |
| L/L (with a 24 CA) | 37 (11.5%) | 18 (5.4%) | 2.60 | 1.41–4.97 | |
| L/L (without 24 CA) | 166 (51.7%) | 165 (49.7%) | 0.15# | 1.27 | 0.92–1.76 |
| Long/short (L/S) | 105 (32.7%) | 135 (40.7%) | 1.19 | 1.01–1.39 | |
| Short/short (S/S) | 13 (4.0%) | 14 (4.2%) | 0.91 | 1.04 | 0.48–2.26 |
FIGURE 2Investigation of STMN2 CA genotypes and their association with sALS disease risk and survival. (A) Allele distributions of the STMN2 CA repeat for 332 healthy controls and 321 sALS cases. The dotted line indicates the cut-off point between short and long CA alleles. Those <19 CA repeats are considered a short allele and those ≥19 CA repeats are considered a long allele. Significance is indicated by the *, p < 0.05. (B) Cumulative survival for 143 sALS patients from Duke University based on those that had L/L 24 CA genotypes compared to those without. (C) Cumulative survival based on site of disease onset (bulbar and spinal) and the presence of the L/L 24 CA genotypes.
Longitudinal clinical characteristics of follow-up Australian sALS cohort (SALSA) (n = 67).
| Clinical characteristics | Mean (SD) or | ||||||||
| Baseline ( | Visit 2 ( | Visit 3 ( | Visit 4 ( | Visit 5 ( | Visit 6 ( | Visit 7 ( | Visit 8 ( | ||
| Age at symptom onset (years) | 61.92 (11.46) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Follow-up interval (mths) | – | 6.34 (9.26) | 11.39 (7.71) | 15.45 (9.34) | 19.97 (11.36) | 24.21 (16.06) | 60.94 (3.76) | 25.9 (–) | |
| Age at assessment (years) | 65.31 (11.77) | 65.83 (11.70) | 64.85 (11.5) | 64.75 (10.99) | 63.20 (10.56) | 64.70 (9.65) | 60.94 (3.76) | 59.31 (–) | |
| Disease duration (years) | 1.81 (2.42) | 2.27 (2.48) | 2.76 (2.64) | 3.24 (2.74) | 3.25 (2.31) | 3.97 (2.89) | 4.90 (1.51) | 5.37 (–) | |
| Sex | Male | 38 (56.7%) | 38 (56.7%) | 31 (60.8%) | 18 (52.9%) | 15 (62.5%) | 8 (66.7%) | 3 (100%) | 1 (100%) |
| Female | 29 (43.3%) | 29 (43.3%) | 20 (39.2%) | 16 (47.1%) | 9 (37.5%) | 4 (33.3%) | – | – | |
| Onset type | Spinal | 49 (73.1%) | 49 (73.1%) | 36 (70.6%) | 28 (82.4%) | 20 (83.3%) | 12 (100%) | 3 (100%) | 1 (100%) |
| Bulbar | 18 (26.9%) | 18 (26.9%) | 15 (29.4%) | 6 (17.6%) | 2 (16.7%) | – | – | – | |
| ALSFRS | 35.64 (8.4) | 32.39 (8.38) | 30.18 (8.19) | 27.44 (9.98) | 25.33 (9.02) | 22.75 (9.90) | 18.67 (6.66) | 24 (–) | |
FIGURE 3The effect of CA genotype on STMN2 mRNA expression in olfactory neurosphere derived cell lines and laser captured spinal motor neurons. (A) Immunostaining of ONS cells with Nestin, NeuN, and β-tubulin. (B) Variable expression of STMN2 in sALS ONS cell lines (lanes 5–8) compared to control ONS cell lines (lanes 1–4). (C) Relative densitometry of TARDBP and STMN2 standardized to GAPDH expression showing variable expression of STMN2 in sALS cell lines and no difference in TARDBP. (D) Trend for a stepwise decrease in STMN2 mRNA expression between control and sALS cases according to STMN2 CA genotype (S/L vs. L/L), error bars represent standard error of the mean. RNA sequencing data was analyzed by Krach et al. (2018) and STMN2 expression between cases and controls previously reported (Melamed et al., 2019). (E) Percentage of motor neurons positive for phosphorylated TDP-43 during initial sample collection done by Krach et al. (2018), according to STMN2 CA genotype. (F) Percentage of motor neuron death according to STMN2 CA genotype based on data collected by Krach et al. (2018).