| Literature DB >> 33838582 |
Gouda H Attia1, Yasmine S Moemen2, Mahmoud Youns3, Ammar M Ibrahim4, Randa Abdou5, Mohamed A El Raey6.
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which caused the coronavirus (COVID-19), is the virus responsible for over 69,613,607 million infections and over 1,582,966 deaths worldwide. All treatment measures and protocols were considered to be supportive only and not curative. During this current coronavirus pandemic, searching for pharmaceutical or traditional complementary and integrative medicine to assist with prevention, treatment, and recovery has been advantageous. These phytopharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals can be more economic, available, safe and lower side effects. This is in silico comparison study of ten phenolic antiviral agents against SARS-CoV-2, as well as isolation of the most active metabolite from natural sources. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) were also then prepared using these metabolite as a reducing agent. All tested compounds showed predicted anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. Hesperidin showed the highest docking score, this leads us to isolate it from the orange peels and we confirmed its structure by conventenional spectroscopic analysis. In addition, synthesis of hesperidin zinc oxide nanoparticles was characterized by UV, IR, XRD and TEM. In vitro antiviral activity of hesperidin and ZnO NPs was evaluated against hepatitis A virus as an example of RNA viruses. However, ZnO NPs and hesperidin showed antiviral activity against HAV but ZnO NPs showed higher activity than hesperidin. Thus, hesperidin and its mediated ZnO nanoparticles are willing antiviral agents and further studies against SARS-CoV-2 are required to be used as a potential treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Hesperidin; Molecular docking; Nutraceuticals; SARS-CoV-2; Zinc oxide nanoparticles
Year: 2021 PMID: 33838582 PMCID: PMC7997700 DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces ISSN: 0927-7765 Impact factor: 5.268
Fig. 1Main protease (6lu7) was been classified according to their domain regions; domain I (residues 8–101), domain II (residues 102–184) with an antiparallel β- sheet structure and domain III (residues 201–303) which was been arranged in an α helix, as well as cleft region between domain II and III (residues 185–200) [8].
Fig. 2Hesperidin (left) and lyoniresinol (right) with all possible conformations docked to the main protease (6lu7).
The binding mode, type of interaction and binding energy of phenolic compounds.
| Compound | Binding mode | Type of interaction | Binding Energy (Kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hesperidin with Mpro | THR 25, LEU 27, HIS 41, ASN 119, SER 123, LEU141, GLY 143, CYS 145. | Van der Waals | −8.84 |
| THR 24 | Conv-HB | ||
| MET 49 | Pi-alkyl | ||
| TYR 118 | Pi-Pi Stacked | ||
| THR 26, ASN 142 | C-HB | ||
| Hesperidin with HAV 3C Proteinase | LYS146, LEU168, GLY194, GLY195, SER197 | Van der Waals | −6.91 |
| PRO169 | C-HB | ||
| ASN196 | Amide-Pi Staked | ||
| Myricetin-3- | HIS41, CYS44, THR45, MET49, TYR118, ASN142, GLY143 | Van der Waals | −8.61 |
| THR 24, THR 25 | Conv- HB | ||
| SER46 | C-HB | ||
| Diosmin | THR25,THR 26,THR 45,MET 49 ASN119,LEU141, ASN 142,GLY143, GLN189 | Van der Waals | −8.59 |
| THR 24, SER 46 | Conv- HB | ||
| THR 24 | C-HB | ||
| TYR 118 | Pi-Pi Stacked | ||
| Epigallocatechin-3- | THR26, LEU 27, HIS41, MET 49, ASN 142, GLY 143 | Van der Waals | −7.91 |
| THR 24, THR 25 | Conv- HB | ||
| THR 24 | Amide-Pi Stacked |
Fig. 3a. UV spectrum of ZnO NPs b. IR Spectrum of hesperidin mediated zinc oxide nanoparticles.
Fig. 4TEM spectrum of ZnO NPs mediated by orange peels hesperidin (a. low resolution b. high resolution).
Fig. 5XRD of ZnO NPs mediated by Hesperidin.