Literature DB >> 33835322

Implementation of a Software Distribution Intervention to Improve Workload Balance in an Academic Pediatric Radiology Department.

Marla B K Sammer1,2, Andrew Stahl3, Eray Ozkan3, Andrew C Sher4,5.   

Abstract

In our pediatric radiology department, radiographs (XR) are the shared responsibility of the body section and interpreted in addition to modality or site-specific assignments. Given an unequal contribution amongst radiologists to the XR workload, a software solution was developed to distribute radiographs and improve workload balance. Metrics to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness were compared before and after the intervention. Data was retrieved from the radiology analytics platform, scheduling software, and the peer learning database. Metrics were compared 12 months pre (March 2018-February 2019) and 6 months post (March 2019-August 2019) intervention on non-holiday weekdays, 7 am-5 pm. To evaluate the intervention's effectiveness, variance between radiologists' contributions to XR volume was assessed using Levene's and Fisher's tests. Changes in turnaround times (TATs) and error rates pre- and post-intervention were evaluated as secondary metrics. Following the intervention, the average number of XR interpreted on target rotations increased by 8.9% (p = 0.011) while the departmental volume of radiographs increased only 4.5%. The variance between radiologists' daily XR contribution was 21.3% (p < 0.0001) higher prior to the intervention. Days where target rotations read fewer than 5 XR decreased from 17.8 to 1.1% (p < 0.0001) after the intervention. Days in which more than 75% of all XR had a TAT less than 60 min improved from 26.8 to 39.7% (p = 0.017) after the intervention. There was no statistically significant difference in error frequency (error rate 2.49% pre and 2.72% post, p = 0.636). In conclusion, the software intervention improved XR workload contribution with decreased variability. Despite increased volumes, there was an improvement in turnaround times with no effect on error rates.
© 2021. Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burnout; Motivation; Radiologists; Software; Workflow; Workload

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33835322      PMCID: PMC8329137          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00451-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.903


  19 in total

1.  Six areas of worklife: a model of the organizational context of burnout.

Authors:  M P Leiter; C Maslach
Journal:  J Health Hum Serv Adm       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Quality initiatives: lean approach to improving performance and efficiency in a radiology department.

Authors:  Jonathan B Kruskal; Allen Reedy; Laurie Pascal; Max P Rosen; Phillip M Boiselle
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  A Roadmap for Value-Based Payments.

Authors:  Giles W Boland; Richard Duszak
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Informatics in radiology: automated Web-based graphical dashboard for radiology operational business intelligence.

Authors:  Paul G Nagy; Max J Warnock; Mark Daly; Christopher Toland; Christopher D Meenan; Reuben S Mezrich
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Bias in Neuroradiology Peer Review: Impact of a "Ding" on "Dinging" Others.

Authors:  P Charkhchi; B Wang; B Caffo; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Meaningful Peer Review in Radiology: A Review of Current Practices and Potential Future Directions.

Authors:  Andrew K Moriarity; C Matthew Hawkins; J Raymond Geis; Keith J Dreyer; Aaron P Kamer; Paras Khandheria; Jose Morey; James Whitfill; Richard H Wiggins; Jason N Itri
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Practice policy and quality initiatives: decreasing variability in turnaround time for radiographic studies from the emergency department.

Authors:  Alexander J Towbin; Srikant B Iyer; James Brown; Kartik Varadarajan; Laurie A Perry; David B Larson
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  Quality measures and pediatric radiology: suggestions for the transition to value-based payment.

Authors:  Richard E Heller; Brian D Coley; Stephen F Simoneaux; Daniel J Podberesky; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Richard L Robertson; Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23

9.  Burnout of Radiologists: Frequency, Risk Factors, and Remedies: A Report of the ACR Commission on Human Resources.

Authors:  Jay A Harolds; Jay R Parikh; Edward I Bluth; Sharon C Dutton; Michael P Recht
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Radiologist Quality Assurance by Nonradiologists at Tumor Board.

Authors:  William R Masch; Neehar D Parikh; Tracy L Licari; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.