Literature DB >> 22323617

Quality initiatives: lean approach to improving performance and efficiency in a radiology department.

Jonathan B Kruskal1, Allen Reedy, Laurie Pascal, Max P Rosen, Phillip M Boiselle.   

Abstract

Many hospital radiology departments are adopting "lean" methods developed in automobile manufacturing to improve operational efficiency, eliminate waste, and optimize the value of their services. The lean approach, which emphasizes process analysis, has particular relevance to radiology departments, which depend on a smooth flow of patients and uninterrupted equipment function for efficient operation. However, the application of lean methods to isolated problems is not likely to improve overall efficiency or to produce a sustained improvement. Instead, the authors recommend a gradual but continuous and comprehensive "lean transformation" of work philosophy and workplace culture. Fundamental principles that must consistently be put into action to achieve such a transformation include equal involvement of and equal respect for all staff members, elimination of waste, standardization of work processes, improvement of flow in all processes, use of visual cues to communicate and inform, and use of specific tools to perform targeted data collection and analysis and to implement and guide change. Many categories of lean tools are available to facilitate these tasks: value stream mapping for visualizing the current state of a process and identifying activities that add no value; root cause analysis for determining the fundamental cause of a problem; team charters for planning, guiding, and communicating about change in a specific process; management dashboards for monitoring real-time developments; and a balanced scorecard for strategic oversight and planning in the areas of finance, customer service, internal operations, and staff development. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22323617     DOI: 10.1148/rg.322115128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  29 in total

1.  Quality improvement in basic histotechnology: the lean approach.

Authors:  David Clark
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Is there an association between radiologist turnaround time of emergency department abdominal CT studies and radiologic report quality?

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; John A Bonavita; Mark P Foran; Brent W Matza; John M McMenamy
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-10-03

Review 3.  Academic radiology in the new health care delivery environment.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; John-Paul J Yu; Akash P Kansagra; Nathaniel von Fischer; Daniel Costa; Matthew Heller; Stamatis Kantartzis; R Scooter Plowman; Jason Itri
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  [Teleradiological report turnaround times: An internal efficiency and quality control analysis].

Authors:  T Seithe; M de Bucourt; T Seithe; R Busse; M Rief; R Doyscher; L Albrecht; H Rathke; M Jonczyk; R Poschmann; H Tepe; B Hamm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Budget impact analysis of a breast rapid diagnostic unit.

Authors:  M Elmi; H Hussein; S Nofech-Mozes; B Curpen; A Leahey; N Look Hong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Improving patient access to an interventional US clinic.

Authors:  Joseph R Steele; Ryan K Clarke; John A Terrell; Tonya R Brightmon
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  From Information Management to Information Visualization: Development of Radiology Dashboards.

Authors:  Mahtab Karami; Reza Safdari
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  Automated Misspelling Detection and Correction in Persian Clinical Text.

Authors:  Azita Yazdani; Marjan Ghazisaeedi; Nasrin Ahmadinejad; Masoumeh Giti; Habibe Amjadi; Azin Nahvijou
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Using Quality Improvement Methodology to Reduce Costs while Improving Efficiency and Provider Satisfaction in a Busy, Academic Musculoskeletal Radiology Division.

Authors:  Steven J Baccei; Scott R Henderson; Hao S Lo; Kevin Reynolds
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Factors predicting the time-length variability of identically protocoled MRI exams.

Authors:  Gregory D Avey; Daryn S Belden; Ryan D Zea; John-Paul J Yu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.