| Literature DB >> 33833817 |
Lídia Audrey Rocha Valadas1, Patrícia Leal Dantas Lobo1, Said Gonçalves da Cruz Fonseca1, Francisco Vagnaldo Fechine1, Edilson Martins Rodrigues Neto1, Marta Maria de França Fonteles1, Lorena Ribeiro de Aguiar Trévia1, Hilda Lara Prado Vasconcelos1, Sandra Mara da Silva Lima1, Mara Assef Leitao Lotif1, Analice Mendes Barreto Fernandes1, Mary Anne Medeiros Bandeira1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and microbiological efficacies of (C. langsdorffii) dental varnish in children at high risk of dental caries..Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33833817 PMCID: PMC8018848 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6647849
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1CONSORT 2010 flow diagram of the study.
Amount of S. mutans, expressed as the logarithm of the number of colony forming units (CFU) per mL of saliva, measured in saliva samples with dilution of 1 : 10 on days 0 (pretreatment), 90, 180, and 360 in patients treated with chlorhexidine, fluoride, and copaiba varnishes.
| Chlorhexidine | Fluoride | Copaiba | Significance (ANOVA) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| 0 | 0.58 ± 0.43 | 0.86 ± 0.37 | 1.32 ± 0.61a,d | |
| 90 | 0.38 ± 0.23 | 0.51 ± 0.33x | 0.99 ± 0.57a,c,y | |
| 180 | 0.33 ± 0.14y | 0.41 ± 0.24x | 0.39 ± 0.22x,z |
|
| 360 | 0.55 ± 0.52 | 0.53 ± 0.44x | 0.12 ± 0.19b,d,x,z | |
| Significance (repeated measures ANOVA) | — |
SD, standard deviation; ANOVA, analysis of variance. The letters a(P < 0.001) and b(P < 0.01) denote statistically significant differences in relation to the chlorhexidine varnish on the same day, while the letters c(P < 0.001) and d(P < 0.01) indicate statistically significant differences in relation to the fluoride varnish on the same day (Tukey test). The letters x(P < 0.001) and y(P < 0.05) designate statistically significant differences in relation to day 0 in the same group, while the letter z(P < 0.001) denotes statistically significant difference in relation to day 90 in the same group (Tukey's test).
Amount of Streptococcus mutans, expressed as the logarithm of the number of CFU per mL of saliva, measured in saliva samples with dilution of 1 : 100 on days 0 (pretreatment), 90, 180, and 360 in patients treated with chlorhexidine, fluoride, and copaiba varnishes.
| Day | Chlorhexidine | Fluoride | Copaiba | Significance (ANOVA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| 0 | 0.45 ± 0.26 | 0.48 ± 0.20 | 0.89 ± 0.55a.c | |
| 90 | 0.33 ± 0.13 | 0.36 ± 0.11 | 0.66 ± 0.44a.c | |
| 180 | 0.30 ± 0.00v | 0.34 ± 0.07w | 0.38 ± 0.19u.y |
|
| 360 | 0.31 ± 0.18w | 0.40 ± 0.28 | 0.10 ± 0.19b.c.u.x.z | |
| Significance (repeated measures ANOVA) | — |
SD, standard deviation; ANOVA, analysis of variance. The letters a(P < 0.001) and b(P < 0.01) denote statistically significant differences in relation to the chlorhexidine varnish on the same day, while the letter c(P < 0.001) indicates statistically significant difference in relation to the fluoride varnish on the same day (Tukey test). The letters u(P < 0.001), v(P < 0.01), and w(P < 0.05) designate statistically significant differences in relation to day 0 in the same group; the letters x(P < 0.001) and y(P < 0.05) denote statistically significant differences in relation to day 90 in the same group, while the letter z(P < 0.05) indicates statistically significant difference in relation to day 180 in the same group (Tukey test).
Distribution of the lesions on the molars (scores ICDAS II) of different groups treated with dental varnishes at the end of the study.
| Tooth | Copaiba | Chlorhexidine | Fluoride |
|---|---|---|---|
| Score 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Score 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Score 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Score 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Score 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Score 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Score 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |