| Literature DB >> 33833503 |
Chong Li1,2,3, Jianchun He4, Yue Yang1,5, Yuting Gou1,5, Zhiying Wang6, Hong Chen7, Xin Zhao1,2,3.
Abstract
AIM: White tip silver needle, a slightly fermented white tea, is abundant in flavonoids, and it has great significance in terms of D-galactose/lipopolysaccharide-induced aging in mice.Entities:
Keywords: D-galactose/lipopolysaccharide; inflammation; oxidation; white tip silver needle flavonoids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33833503 PMCID: PMC8020812 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S304885
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.162
Figure 1Establishment of aging mouse model.
Primer Sequences in This Study
| Gene Name | Sequence |
|---|---|
| Forward: 5ʹ-AACCAGTTGTGTTGTGAGGAC-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5ʹ-CCACCATGTTTCTTAGAGTGAGG-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-CAGACCTGCCTTACGACTATGG-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-CTCGGTGGCGTTGAGATTGTT-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-GGAGGCGGGAACCCAATAG-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-GTGTGCCATCTCGTCAGTGAA-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-GTCGGTGTATGCCTTCTCGG-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-AGAGAGACGCGACATTCTCAAT-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-CTTACTGACTGGCATGAGGATCA-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-GCAGCTCTAGGAGCATGTGG-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-CTGCAAGAGACTTCCATCCAG-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-AGTGGTATAGACAGGTCTGTTGG-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-CAGGCGGTGCCTATGTCTC-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-CGATCACCCCGAAGTTCAGTAG-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-GGCCTAGCTCTGAGACAATGAAC-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-TGACCTCAAACTTGGCAATACTC-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-GAAATGCCACCTTTTGACAGTG-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-TGGATGCTCTCATCAGGACAG-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-GACTCTTGCGTCAACTTCAAGG-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-CAGGCTGTCTTTTGTCAACGA-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-CCCAACGTCATTTCTGTCCGT-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-TCTACCAGGGGCCGATCATT-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-GTTCTCAGCCCAACAATACAAGA-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-GTGGACGGGTCGATGTCAC-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-TCAGCCATCACAGTGTTCCC-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-ATAGCCCGCATAGCGTATCAG-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-TTCCAATCCATGTCAAAACCGT-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-AGTCCGGGTACAGTCACACTT-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-ATGGCAGACGATGATCCCTAC-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-CGGAATCGAAATCCCCTCTGTT-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-TAGATGACCATGAGTCGCTTGC-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-GCCAAACTTGCTCCATGTCC-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-GATAGAGCGCAACAAGCAGAA-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-CAGTGAGGCCCATACCAGAAG-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-AGGATGGGAGGTACTCGAATC-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-TGCTAGAGATGACTCGGAAGG-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-CGCGGGATGGCCTCAAGAAGGA-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-GCCAAGTGCAGGAACGAGTCT-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-TGCTACGTGGTGTGGACCTTGC-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′-ACCGGAGAACTCCCCCACCT-3′ | |
| Forward: 5′-GAGAAAATCTGGCACCACACCT-3′ | |
| Reverse: 5′- GCACAGCCTGGATAGCAACGTA-3′ |
Mass Spectrum Parameters in This Study
| No. | Component | Parent Ion (m/z) | Daughter Ion (m/z) | Collision Energy/V | Entrance Voltage/V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baicalein | 271.1 | 123.1* | −51 | 11 |
| 253.1 | −90 | 12 | |||
| 2 | Kaempferol | 287.1 | 153.1* | −51 | 63 |
| 213.1 | −52 | 47 | |||
| 3 | Kaempferide | 301.1 | 286.1 | −98 | 16 |
| 165.1* | −55 | 20 | |||
| 4 | Quercetin | 303.2 | 229.1* | −51 | 55 |
| 257.1 | −97 | 59 | |||
| 5 | Isorhamnetin | 318.3 | 88.1* | −51 | 24 |
| 256.4 | −98 | 2 | |||
| 6 | Lespenephryl | 579.3 | 287.1* | −52 | 8 |
| 433.1 | −95 | 13 | |||
| 7 | Rutin | 611.2 | 303.1* | −82 | 14 |
| 465.2 | −99 | 19 |
Note: *Quantitative ion.
Figure 2Total ion chromatography of WTSNF. 1: baicalein; 2: kaempferol; 3: kaempferide; 4: quercetin; 5: isorhamnetin; 6: lespenephryl; 7: rutin.
Relative Molecular Mass, Molecular Formula, Structure, Retention Time and Content of Seven Flavonoids in WTSNF
| No. | Component | Relative Molecular Mass | Molecular Formula | Structural Formula | Retention Time(Min) | Contents(ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lespenephryl | 578.5187 | C27H30O14 | 2.1 | 1987.047 | |
| 2 | Rutin | 610.51 | C27H30O16 | 2.352 | 582.509 | |
| 3 | Kaempferol | 286.24 | C15H10O6 | 2.394 | 2038.636 | |
| 4 | Quercetin | 302.24 | C15H10O7 | 2.478 | 1111.259 | |
| 5 | Kaempferide | 300.2629 | C16H12O6 | 2.52 | 11.90 | |
| 6 | Isorhamnetin | 316.26 | C16H12O7 | 2.898 | 712.691 | |
| 7 | Baicalein | 270.24 | C15H10O5 | 3.024 | 17.94 |
Clearance of ABTS and DPPH by WTSNF
| Groups | Low | High |
|---|---|---|
| ABTS | 12.7±1.47bc | 50.6±1.08a |
| DPPH | 25.07±1.66b | 62.51±0.8a |
Notes: Low: WTSNF with concentration 16 μg/mL; High: WTSNF with concentration 32 μg/mL. a,bMean values with different letters in the same line are significantly different (p< 0.05), as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test. cValues presented are the mean ±standard deviation (SD) of different organ coefficient.
Main Organ Index Treated with D-Gal/LPS
| Groups | Heart | Lung | Liver | Spleen | Kidney |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 5.78±0.25a | 5.21±0.13bc | 40.01±0.74a | 7.58±0.24a | 13.15±0.26a |
| Model | 4.83±0.19c | 4.59±0.11c | 38.04±0.31c | 6.06±0.25c | 11.88±0.29bc |
| Low | 5.24±0.16b | 5.4±0.12ab | 39.19±0.46ab | 6.8±0.27b | 12.27±0.25b |
| High | 5.6±0.21a | 5.7±0.18a | 40.09±0.82a | 8.11±0.38a | 13.41±0.43a |
Notes: Model: mice treated with D-Gal (30 mg/kg·bw)/LPS (3 μg/kg·bw); Low: mice treated with WTSNF (150 mg/kg); High: mice treated with WTSNF (300 mg/kg). Values are mean ±standard deviation (SD). a–cMean values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (p< 0.05), as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 3Histological observation of liver, lung and kidney in mice. Model: mice treated with D-Gal (30 mg/kg·bw)/LPS (3 μg/kg·bw); Low: mice treated with WTSNF (150 mg/kg); High: mice treated with WTSNF (300 mg/kg). →Liver cord; ↓inflammatory cell in liver; ↑pulmonary interstitium; ←alveoli; ▻glomerulus; ∆inflammatory cell in kidney.
Levels of AST and ALT in Serum of Mice
| Groups | AST(U/L) | ALT(U/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Normal | 5.87±0.68de | 1.2±0.19c |
| Model | 10.92±0.57a | 2.45±0.11a |
| Low | 8.59±0.74b | 1.88±0.16b |
| High | 6.5±0.65c | 0.42±0.10d |
Notes: Model: mice treated with D-Gal (30 mg/kg·bw)/LPS (3 μg/kg·bw); Low: mice treated with WTSNF (150 mg/kg); High: mice treated with WTSNF (300 mg/kg). eValues are mean ±standard deviation (SD). a–dMean values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (p< 0.05), as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase.
Figure 4Levels of SOD, CAT, GSH, GSH-Px, T-AOC, MDA and NO in serum and liver in mice. Model: mice treated with D-Gal (30 mg/kg·bw)/LPS (3 μg/kg·bw); Low: mice treated with WTSNF (150 mg/kg); High: mice treated with WTSNF (300 mg/kg). a–dMean values with different letters in the same bar graph are significantly different (p<0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 5Levels of IL-6, IL-10, IL-1β, IL-12, TNF-α and IFN-γ in serum and liver in mice. Model: mice treated with D-Gal (30 mg/kg·bw)/LPS (3 μg/kg·bw); Low: mice treated with WTSNF (150 mg/kg); High: mice treated with WTSNF (300 mg/kg). a–dMean values with different letters in the same bar graph are significantly different (p<0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 6The Cu/Zn-SOD, Mn-SOD, CAT and GSH-Px mRNA expression in liver of mice. Model: mice treated with D-Gal (30 mg/kg·bw)/LPS (3 μg/kg·bw); Low: mice treated with WTSNF (150 mg/kg); High: mice treated with WTSNF (300 mg/kg). a–dMean values with different letters in the same bar graph are significantly different (p<0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 7The IL-6, IL-10, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-18 and IFN-γ mRNA expression in liver of mice. Model: mice treated with D-Gal (30 mg/kg·bw)/LPS (3 μg/kg·bw); Low: mice treated with WTSNF (150 mg/kg); High: mice treated with WTSNF (300 mg/kg). a–dMean values with different letters in the same bar graph are significantly different (p<0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 8The nNOS, iNOS, eNOS and COX-2 mRNA expression in liver of mice. Model: mice treated with D-Gal (30 mg/kg·bw)/LPS (3 μg/kg·bw); Low: mice treated with WTSNF (150 mg/kg); High: mice treated with WTSNF (300 mg/kg). a–dMean values with different letters in the same bar graph are significantly different (p<0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 9The Nfr2, HO-1, NQO1, NF-κB, IKB-α and Trx mRNA expression in liver of mice. Model: mice treated with D-Gal (30 mg/kg·bw)/LPS (3 μg/kg·bw); Low: mice treated with WTSNF (150 mg/kg); High: mice treated with WTSNF (300 mg/kg). a–dMean values with different letters in the same bar graph are significantly different (p<0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.