Literature DB >> 33833496

Objective Monitoring of Spectacle Wearing Times in Adult Subjects Using the Theramon® Thermosensor.

Annegret Abaza1, Gideon Wahl1, Constanze Kortüm1, Kai Januschowski1,2, Dorothea Besch1, Charlotte Schramm1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To find a reliable method to determine the wearing times of glasses in adults objectively on the basis of temperature measurements of the small-sized theramon® thermosensor device (TM) from orthodontics. Furthermore, the reliability of the determined wearing times during well and poor position of spectacles was explored. To address the previously reported lack of accuracy during higher outside temperatures, this study was conducted in midsummer and autumn. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty adults wore their spectacles with three TMs attached to both inner sides and the right outer side in a period of three consecutive days. They were asked to report wearing and non-wearing times, indoor and outdoor activities and subjective perception of spectacle position as accurately as possible. To find the most reliable way to determine spectacle wearing times compared to protocolled wearing times, we applied and evaluated temperature categorizing methods and visual analysis of time logged temperatures. Percent error and percent accuracy of each method were calculated. The methods mentioned were applied and evaluated to determine poor spectacle position.
RESULTS: Median percent errors of the most reliable determination methods were <10% with an accuracy between 90% and 96%. Comparing the most reliable methods, determinations on the basis of midsummer measurements (median percent error 0% to 2%, median percent accuracy 96%) were more accurate than on the basis of autumn measurements (median percent error -5% to -20%, median percent accuracy 90%). Poor spectacle position could be determined with a median percent error of 0% and a median percent accuracy of 100% by analysing the temperature measurements of TM's visually.
CONCLUSION: A reliable and objective determination of spectacle wearing times is possible on the basis of TM temperature measurements in a standard clinical setting. Measurements of one inner TM seem to be sufficient to determine the wearing times and are more appealing. Poor spectacle position can be determined reliably by analysing visually the time logged temperatures. The findings of this study require further studies on larger groups of affected, amblyopic patients and children, to analyse the real impact of spectacle wearing times and poor spectacle position on visual development.
© 2021 Abaza et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amblyopia; objective monitoring; spectacle adherence; spectacle wearing times; theramon® thermosensor

Year:  2021        PMID: 33833496      PMCID: PMC8020140          DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S287508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1177-5467


  22 in total

1.  Applicative characteristics of new microelectronic sensors Smart Retainer® and TheraMon® for measuring wear time.

Authors:  Timm Cornelius Schott; Gernot Göz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Electronic recording of occlusion treatment for amblyopia: potential of the new technology.

Authors:  Yaroslava Chopovska; Sjoukje E Loudon; Licia Cirina; Alina Zubcov; Huibert J Simonsz; Marc Lüchtenberg; Maria Fronius
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Compliance and Predictors of Spectacle Wear in Schoolchildren and Reasons for Non-Wear: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Priya Morjaria; Ian McCormick; Clare Gilbert
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 1.648

4.  A randomized controlled trial of unilateral strabismic and mixed amblyopia using occlusion dose monitors to record compliance.

Authors:  Musarat Awan; Frank A Proudlock; Irene Gottlob
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Compliance in amblyopia therapy: objective monitoring of occlusion.

Authors:  A R Fielder; M Irwin; R Auld; K D Cocker; H S Jones; M J Moseley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Electronic monitoring of treatment compliance in patching for amblyopia.

Authors:  H J Simonsz; J R Polling; R Voorn; J van Leeuwen; H Meester; C Romijn; B G Dijkstra
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  1999-06

7.  Wearing times of orthodontic devices as measured by the TheraMon® microsensor.

Authors:  Timm Cornelius Schott; Gernot Göz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Objective measurement of spectacle wear with a temperature sensor data logger.

Authors:  Matthew J Lentsch; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Norms and trends of sleep time among US children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jessica A Williams; Frederick J Zimmerman; Janice F Bell
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 16.193

10.  Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS).

Authors:  Catherine E Stewart; Merrick J Moseley; David A Stephens; Alistair R Fielder
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.