Literature DB >> 15790912

A randomized controlled trial of unilateral strabismic and mixed amblyopia using occlusion dose monitors to record compliance.

Musarat Awan1, Frank A Proudlock, Irene Gottlob.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate compliance with patching therapy and the dose-effect relationship in occlusion therapy in amblyopia by recording the effective patching time using occlusion dose monitors (ODMs).
METHODS: Fifty-two children with strabismic or mixed amblyopia (Snellen equivalent, 6/12-6/48) were given optimal refractive correction and randomly allocated for 12 weeks into three treatment groups: group 1, no patching; group 2, prescribed patching for 3 hours; and group 3, prescribed patching for 6 hours. The effective time of occlusion was monitored with ODMs continuously. Visual acuity (VA) was measured every 3 weeks with LogMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) Crowded Tests.
RESULTS: In the 3- and 6-hour groups, mean (SD) compliance was 57.5% (30.8%) and 41.2% (30.9%), respectively, and mean effective patching time per day was 1 hour 43 minutes (55 minutes) and 2 hours 33 minutes (1 hour 52 minutes), respectively. The mean (SD) improvement in logMAR VA of amblyopic eyes was 0.24 (0.17), 0.29 (0.14), and 0.34 (0.19) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was no significant difference in compliance with the prescribed patching between the 3- and 6-hour groups. VA outcomes in the 3- and 6-hour groups were not significantly better than 0-hour patching. However, the VA of patients with eyes effectively patched for more than 3 hours improved significantly. A dose-effect relationship was observed. Age at treatment did not influence the visual outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Poor compliance with prescribed occlusion explains discrepancies in previous studies. No differences in the effect between the different prescribed patching periods were found. The dose-effect relationship observed should encourage development of methods such as educational intervention to improve visual outcome by increasing effective patching time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15790912     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  41 in total

1.  Optical treatment of strabismic and combined strabismic-anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Susan A Cotter; Nicole C Foster; Jonathan M Holmes; B Michele Melia; David K Wallace; Michael X Repka; Susanna M Tamkins; Raymond T Kraker; Roy W Beck; Darren L Hoover; Eric R Crouch; Aaron M Miller; Christie L Morse; Donny W Suh
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 2.  Amblyopia in children (aged 7 years or less).

Authors:  Stephanie West; Cathy Williams
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2016-01-05

3.  Binocular iPad treatment for amblyopia in preschool children.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Simone L Li; Reed M Jost; Sarah E Morale; Angie De La Cruz; David Stager; Lori Dao; David R Stager
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  A randomized trial to evaluate 2 hours of daily patching for strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia in children.

Authors:  David K Wallace; Allison R Edwards; Susan A Cotter; Roy W Beck; Robert W Arnold; William F Astle; Carmen N Barnhardt; Eileen E Birch; Sean P Donahue; Donald F Everett; Joost Felius; Jonathan M Holmes; Raymond T Kraker; Michele Melia; Michael X Repka; Nicholas A Sala; David I Silbert; Katherine K Weise
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children with refractive correction.

Authors:  Susan A Cotter; Allison R Edwards; David K Wallace; Roy W Beck; Robert W Arnold; William F Astle; Carmen N Barnhardt; Eileen E Birch; Sean P Donahue; Donald F Everett; Joost Felius; Jonathan M Holmes; Raymond T Kraker; Michele Melia; Michael X Repka; Nicholas A Sala; David I Silbert; Katherine K Weise
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Structural and functional comparison of the persistent and resolved amblyopia.

Authors:  Betul Tugcu; Bilge Araz-Ersan; Ezgi Tuna Erdogan; Hatice Tarakcioglu; Cigdem Coskun; Ulviye Yigit; Sacit Karamursel
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  [The latest on amblyopia treatment].

Authors:  O Ehrt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 8.  Amblyopia.

Authors:  Stephanie West; Cathy Williams
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-06-30

Review 9.  Amblyopia.

Authors:  Cathy Williams
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-09-16

10.  Why is compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia so hard? A qualitative study.

Authors:  M Dixon-Woods; M Awan; I Gottlob
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.