| Literature DB >> 33829535 |
Ling Mei1,2, Heng Zhang2,3, Yueyue Chen1,2, Xiaoyu Niu1,2.
Abstract
Congenital vaginal atresia is a rare congenital reproductive tract abnormality. To assess the clinical manifestations and feasibility of preserving uterus for congenital complete vaginal atresia with cervical aplasia, nineteen cases who underwent surgical treatment in West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively studied. The cervical status, clinical manifestations, the rate of vaginal re-stenosis and pelvic inflammation after surgery were assessed. Additional 101 similar cases searched through digital Pub Med were included to analyze the feasibility of preserving the uterus. Periodic abdominal pain, primary amenorrhea, and pelvic mass were the primary signs and symptoms. According to the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), all the uterine cavities expanded, and the atresia sites were above the inner urethral orifice. Data of the cases preserving uteri from both our hospital and the literature showed the rate of re-stenosis in patients with external cervical obstruction was 15.9% while it was 40% in the other types of cervical aplasia (P = .026). The rate of recurrent pelvic inflammation and hysterectomy was 2.3% for cervical external os obstruction and 8% for the other cervical aplasia types(P = .296). In conclusion, vaginoplasty and cervicovaginal anastomosis could preserve the fertility for complete vaginal atresia with cervical external os obstruction.Entities:
Keywords: cervical aplasia; cervicovaginal anastomosis; congenital complete vaginal atresia; tracheloplasty; vaginoplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33829535 PMCID: PMC8360086 DOI: 10.1111/cga.12417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Congenit Anom (Kyoto) ISSN: 0914-3505 Impact factor: 1.409
FIGURE 1Schematic diagram of three types of congenital vaginal atresia
FIGURE 2Schematic diagram of four kinds of congenital cervical aplasia
FIGURE 3T2W pelvic transverse image showing a complete vaginal and cervical atresia case with “T” shaped uterine body. The arrow indicates the “T” shaped uterine cavity
FIGURE 4T2W pelvic sagittal images showing complete vaginal atresia with different cervical aplasia. A, External cervical os. obstruction. Arrow A indicates an expanded uterine cavity, arrow B indicates a dark cervical interstitial ring, arrow C indicates intermediate brightness cervical muscle, which is continuous with uterine muscular layer, arrow D indicates the level of the inner urethral orifice, and arrow E indicates the obstructed external cervical os. B, Complete cervical atresia. Arrow A indicates an expanded uterine cavity; arrow B indicates atresic cervical canal; arrow C indicates the blinded cervix; arrow D indicates the level of the inner urethral orifice. C, Cervical agenesis. Arrow A indicates an expanded uterine cavity; arrow B indicates a blinded lower segment of the uterus; arrow C indicates the level of the inner urethral orifice
Outcomes of complete vaginal atresic patients received vaginoplasty
| Case | Cervical aplasia | Stenosis /adhesion | Pelvic inflammation | Second vaginoplasty | Hysterectomy | Neovaginal Length(cm) | Neovaginal Width(cm) | Sexual active | Pregnant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EosO | Yes | No | Yes | No | 9 | 4 | Yes | No |
| 2 | EosO | Yes | No | Yes | No | 5 | 2 | Yes | No |
| 3 | EosO | No | No | No | No | 7 | 3 | No | No |
| 4 | EosO | No | No | No | No | 6 | 3 | No | No |
| 5 | Agenesis | Yes | Yes | No | No | 6 | 2 | No | No |
| 6 | Atresia | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | — | No | No |
Abbreviation: EosO, external os obstruction.
The patient received hysterectomy 2 years after the first vaginoplasty because of recurrent pelvic inflammation.
Outcomes of 101 patients with complete vaginal atresia preserving uteri identified from the literature
| Study | Case | Cervical aplasia(N) | Stenosis/adhesion | Pelvic inflammation | Second surgery | Hysterectomy | Neovaginal Length (cm) | Neovaginal Width (cm) | Follow up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ying2017 | 4 | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.9 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 12 mo |
| Kobayashi2016 | 1 | Atresia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 36 mo |
| Xie2017 | 28 | 6 mo‐13 y | |||||||
|
EosO(25) Atresia(1) NA(2) |
3 1 0 |
0 0 0 |
0 1 0 |
0 0 0 |
8‐10 NA NA |
Two fingers NA NA | |||
| Zayed2017 | 5 | 12‐36 mo | |||||||
|
EosO(1) Atresia(4) |
0 3 |
0 0 |
0 2 |
0 0 | NA | NA | |||
| NA | NA | ||||||||
| Zhang2015 | 10 | 5 ± 2 mo | |||||||
|
EosO(7) Atresia(3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.3 ± 1.1 | NA | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.3 ± 1.1 | NA | ||||
| Jain2011 | 1 | Agenesis | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | NA | NA | 5 y |
| Mishra2016 | 1 | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 6 mo |
| Paul2019 | 1 | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.5 | NA | 8 mo |
| Minami2019 | 2 | 6 y | |||||||
|
EosO(1) Agenesis(1) |
1 1 |
0 1 |
0 1 |
0 0 | NA | NA | |||
| NA | NA | ||||||||
| He2014 | 1 | Cord | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 18 mo |
| Jeon2016 | 2 | EosO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6–8 | 3 | 6 y |
| Kimble2015 | 1 | EosO | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | NA | NA | 6 y |
| Hampton1990 | 1 | EosO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 8 y |
| Bugmann 2002 | 1 | Agenesis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 3 mo |
| Leng 2002 | 3 | NA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 1‐168 mo |
| Fedele2008 | 12 | 6 ± 2.4 y | |||||||
|
EosO(2) Agenesis(10) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 ± 1.6 | NA | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 ± 1.6 | NA | ||||
| Jasonni2007 | 1 | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 5 mo |
| Shen2016 | 26 | NA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.5‐8.0 | NA | 2‐46 mo |
Abbreviations: EosO, external os obstruction; NA, not available; Mo, months; y, years.