Literature DB >> 21775663

Visual functions and interocular interactions in anisometropic children with and without amblyopia.

Xin Jie Lai1, Jack Alexander, Mingguang He, Zhikuan Yang, Catherine Suttle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In uncorrected anisometropia, protracted dichoptic stimulation may result in interocular inhibition, which may be a contributing factor in amblyopia development. This study investigates the relationship between interocular interactions and anisometropic amblyopia.
METHODS: Three visual functions (low-contrast acuity, contrast sensitivity, and alignment sensitivity) were measured in the nondominant eye of 44 children aged 5 to 11 years: 10 with normal vision, 17 with anisometropia without amblyopia, and 17 with anisometropic amblyopia. The dominant eye was either fully or partially occluded. The difference in nondominant eye visual function between the full-and partial-occlusion conditions was termed the interaction index. The index of each visual function was compared between subject groups. A higher index indicates stronger inhibition of nondominant eye function with partial occlusion of the dominant eye. Amblyopic children had 6 months of therapy (refractive correction and occlusion), and the reduction in interocular difference in high-contrast acuity was regarded as the treatment outcome. The relationships of the interaction index with the degree of anisometropia, the severity of amblyopia, and the treatment outcomes were examined.
RESULTS: The acuity interaction index was significantly higher in anisometropic children with amblyopia than in those without (P = 0.003). It was positively correlated with the degree of anisometropia (r(s) = 0.35, P = 0.042) and the amblyopic treatment outcomes (r(s) = 0.54, P = 0.038). No such difference or association was found between the contrast sensitivity or alignment sensitivity interaction index and anisometropic amblyopia.
CONCLUSIONS: Interocular interactions are associated with amblyopia, the degree of anisometropia, and amblyopia treatment outcomes, but these associations are visual function dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775663     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  6 in total

1.  Discriminating anisometropic amblyopia from myopia based on interocular inhibition.

Authors:  Wuli Jia; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Luis A Lesmes; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Interocular Axial Length Difference and Treatment Outcomes of Anisometropic Amblyopia.

Authors:  Monireh Ghasempour; Masoud Khorrami-Nejad; Aidin Safvati; Babak Masoomian
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2022-04-29

3.  Contrast Sensitivity in Microtropic and Anisometropic Eyes of Successfully Treated Amblyopes.

Authors:  Özlem Öner; Sezin Akça Bayar; Sibel Oto; Onur Gökmen; Mustafa Agah Tekindal
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-01

4.  The effect of different amblyopia treatment protocols on axial length of non-amblyopic eyes in anisohyperopic patients.

Authors:  Monireh Ghasempour; Masoud Khorrami-Nejad; Mohamad Reza Akbari; Mohamad Aghazadeh Amiri
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-29

5.  Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Karel Fliegel; Ladislav Dusek; Tomas Lukes; Jan Hejda; Michaela Duchackova; Jiri Hozman; Rudolf Autrata
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 0.957

6.  Measuring the impact of suppression on visual acuity in children with amblyopia using a dichoptic visual acuity chart.

Authors:  Bixia Zhu; Meng Liao; Longqian Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.152

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.