Literature DB >> 33828719

Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements.

José A León1, José David Moreno1, Inmaculada Escudero2, Johanna K Kaakinen3.   

Abstract

Comprehension and summarizing are closely related. As more strategic and selective processing during reading should be reflected in higher quality of summaries, the aim of this study was to use eye movement patterns to analyze how readers who produce good quality summaries process texts. 40 undergraduate students were instructed to read six expository texts in order to respond a causal question introduced in the end of the first paragraph. After reading, participants produced an oral summary of the text. Based on the quality of the summaries, participants were divided into three groups: High, Medium and Low Quality Summaries. The results revealed that readers who produced High Quality Summaries made significantly more and longer fixations and regressions in the question-relevant parts of texts when compared to the other two summary groups. These results suggest that the summary task performance could be a good predictor of the reading strategies utilized during reading.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Summary quality; eye movements; individual differences; reading comprehension; strategic selective processing

Year:  2019        PMID: 33828719      PMCID: PMC7898009          DOI: 10.16910/jemr.12.1.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  9 in total

1.  Effects of Headings on Text Summarization.

Authors:  Robert F. Lorch; Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch; Kristin Ritchey; Lisa McGovern; Deana Coleman
Journal:  Contemp Educ Psychol       Date:  2001-04

2.  How prior knowledge, WMC, and relevance of information affect eye fixations in expository text.

Authors:  Johanna K Kaakinen; Jukka Hyönä; Janice M Keenan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation.

Authors:  Paul van den Broek
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Perspective effects in repeated reading: an eye movement study.

Authors:  Johanna K Kaakinen; Jukka Hyönä
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

6.  Assessing short summaries with human judgments procedure and latent semantic analysis in narrative and expository texts.

Authors:  José A León; Ricardo Olmos; Inmaculada Escudero; José J Cañas; Lalo Salmerón
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2006-11

7.  Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 8.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer.

Authors:  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca; Tomás Martinez; Ladislao Salmerón; Raquel Cerdán; Ramiro Gilabert; Laura Gil; Amelia Mañá; Ana C Llorens; Ricardo Ferris
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.