Literature DB >> 33828696

Pupillary dilation response reflects surprising moments in music.

Hsin-I Liao1, Makoto Yoneya1, Makio Kashino1, Shigeto Furukawa1.   

Abstract

There are indications that the pupillary dilation response (PDR) reflects surprising moments in an auditory sequence such as the appearance of a deviant noise against repetitively presented pure tones (4), and salient and loud sounds that are evaluated by human paricipants subjectively (12). In the current study, we further examined whether the reflection of PDR in auditory surprise can be accumulated and revealed in complex and yet structured auditory stimuli, i.e., music, and when the surprise is defined subjectively. Participants listened to 15 excerpts of music while their pupillary responses were recorded. In the surprise-rating session, participants rated how surprising an instance in the excerpt was, i.e., rich in variation versus monotonous, while they listened to it. In the passive-listening session, they listened to the same 15 excerpts again but were not involved in any task. The pupil diameter data obtained from both sessions were time-aligned to the rating data obtained from the surprise-rating session. Results showed that in both sessions, mean pupil diameter was larger at moments rated more surprising than unsurprising. The result suggests that the PDR reflects surprise in music automatically.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pupil; art perception; attention; decision making; eye tracking; familiarity; individual differences; music; salience; surprise

Year:  2018        PMID: 33828696      PMCID: PMC7899049          DOI: 10.16910/jemr.11.2.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  27 in total

1.  Pupillary dilation response as an indicator of auditory discrimination in the barn owl.

Authors:  A D Bala; T T Takahashi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Laura Miccoli; Miguel A Escrig; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; James Stout; Christof Koch; Olivia Carter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The eye pupil adjusts to imaginary light.

Authors:  Bruno Laeng; Unni Sulutvedt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-27

5.  Modulation of stimulus contrast on the human pupil orienting response.

Authors:  Chin-An Wang; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Human Pupillary Dilation Response to Deviant Auditory Stimuli: Effects of Stimulus Properties and Voluntary Attention.

Authors:  Hsin-I Liao; Makoto Yoneya; Shunsuke Kidani; Makio Kashino; Shigeto Furukawa
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  The effect of distraction on change detection in crowded acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Theofilos Petsas; Jemma Harrison; Makio Kashino; Shigeto Furukawa; Maria Chait
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Two types of peak emotional responses to music: The psychophysiology of chills and tears.

Authors:  Kazuma Mori; Makoto Iwanaga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The effects of neural gain on attention and learning.

Authors:  Eran Eldar; Jonathan D Cohen; Yael Niv
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  The Eye is Listening: Music-Induced Arousal and Individual Differences Predict Pupillary Responses.

Authors:  Bruno Gingras; Manuela M Marin; Estela Puig-Waldmüller; W T Fitch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pupil Dilation and the Slow Wave ERP Reflect Surprise about Choice Outcome Resulting from Intrinsic Variability in Decision Confidence.

Authors:  Jan Willem de Gee; Camile M C Correa; Matthew Weaver; Tobias H Donner; Simon van Gaal
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Pupillary response to moving stimuli of different speeds.

Authors:  Yuexin Wang; Yining Guo; Jiajia Wang; Ziyuan Liu; Xuemin Li
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.349

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.