Krisna Yuarno Phatama 1 , Abdul Aziz 1 , Muhammad Hilman Bimadi 1 , I Gusti Ngurah Arga Aldrian Oktafandi 1 , Felix Cendikiawan 1 , Edi Mustamsir 1 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Background: The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a useful diagnostic tool to assess knee ligament injury and osteoarthritis, but no validated Indonesian version of the KOOS was available. Methods: We used the forward-backward translation protocol to develop the Indonesian version of the KOOS. The translated questionnaire was administered twice to 51 subjects diagnosed with a knee ligament injury and osteoarthritis. Validity of the questionnaire was assessed by analyzing the correlation between the score of each subscale and the overall score of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Reliability was measured by evaluating internal consistency (Cronbach α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient). Results: For construct validity, moderate Pearson correlation coefficients were found between the KOOS subscales and the SF-36. Cronbach α was 0.84 to 0.97 for all subscales, indicating adequate internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.91 to 0.99 for all subscales. No significant differences were found in the KOOS subscale responses between the first administration of the questionnaire and the second administration within 21 days. Conclusion: The Indonesian version of the KOOS was determined to be valid and reliable and is therefore an objective instrument for evaluating knee ligament injury and knee osteoarthritis in the Indonesian population. ©2021 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Background: The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a useful diagnostic tool to assess knee ligament injury and osteoarthritis , but no validated Indonesian version of the KOOS was available. Methods: We used the forward-backward translation protocol to develop the Indonesian version of the KOOS. The translated questionnaire was administered twice to 51 subjects diagnosed with a knee ligament injury and osteoarthritis . Validity of the questionnaire was assessed by analyzing the correlation between the score of each subscale and the overall score of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Reliability was measured by evaluating internal consistency (Cronbach α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient). Results: For construct validity, moderate Pearson correlation coefficients were found between the KOOS subscales and the SF-36. Cronbach α was 0.84 to 0.97 for all subscales, indicating adequate internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.91 to 0.99 for all subscales. No significant differences were found in the KOOS subscale responses between the first administration of the questionnaire and the second administration within 21 days. Conclusion: The Indonesian version of the KOOS was determined to be valid and reliable and is therefore an objective instrument for evaluating knee ligament injury and knee osteoarthritis in the Indonesian population. ©2021 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
Activities of daily living; Indonesia; diagnostic self-evaluation; knee injuries; osteoarthritis–knee; pain measurement; quality of life; validation study
Year: 2021
PMID： 33828426 PMCID： PMC7993429 DOI： 10.31486/toj.20.0088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ochsner J ISSN： 1524-5012