Literature DB >> 33828169

Efficient collection of a large number of mutations by mutagenesis of DNA damage response defective animals.

Yuji Suehiro1, Sawako Yoshina1, Tomoko Motohashi1, Satoru Iwata2, Katsufumi Dejima1, Shohei Mitani3,4.   

Abstract

With the development of massive parallel sequencing technology, it has become easier to establish new model organisms that are ideally suited to the specific biological phenomena of interest. Considering the history of research using classical model organisms, we believe that the efficient construction and sharing of gene mutation libraries will facilitate the progress of studies using these new model organisms. Using C. elegans, we applied the TMP/UV mutagenesis method to animals lacking function in the DNA damage response genes atm-1 and xpc-1. This method produces genetic mutations three times more efficiently than mutagenesis of wild-type animals. Furthermore, we confirmed that the use of next-generation sequencing and the elimination of false positives through machine learning could automate the process of mutation identification with an accuracy of over 95%. Eventually, we sequenced the whole genomes of 488 strains and isolated 981 novel mutations generated by the present method; these strains have been made available to anyone who wants to use them. Since the targeted DNA damage response genes are well conserved and the mutagens used in this study are also effective in a variety of species, we believe that our method is generally applicable to a wide range of animal species.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33828169     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87226-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  48 in total

Review 1.  RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Blake Wiedenheft; Samuel H Sternberg; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Whole-genome profiling of mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Stephane Flibotte; Mark L Edgley; Iasha Chaudhry; Jon Taylor; Sarah E Neil; Aleksandra Rogula; Rick Zapf; Martin Hirst; Yaron Butterfield; Steven J Jones; Marco A Marra; Robert J Barstead; Donald G Moerman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Drosophila gene disruption project: progress using transposons with distinctive site specificities.

Authors:  Hugo J Bellen; Robert W Levis; Yuchun He; Joseph W Carlson; Martha Evans-Holm; Eunkyung Bae; Jaeseob Kim; Athanasios Metaxakis; Charalambos Savakis; Karen L Schulze; Roger A Hoskins; Allan C Spradling
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Chemical and UV Mutagenesis.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Bose
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

5.  A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Miller; Siyuan Tan; Guijuan Qiao; Kyle A Barlow; Jianbin Wang; Danny F Xia; Xiangdong Meng; David E Paschon; Elo Leung; Sarah J Hinkley; Gladys P Dulay; Kevin L Hua; Irina Ankoudinova; Gregory J Cost; Fyodor D Urnov; H Steve Zhang; Michael C Holmes; Lei Zhang; Philip D Gregory; Edward J Rebar
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Mouse mutagenesis-systematic studies of mammalian gene function.

Authors:  S D Brown; P M Nolan
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Characterization of mutations induced by ethyl methanesulfonate, UV, and trimethylpsoralen in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  K Gengyo-Ando; S Mitani
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2000-03-05       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  The knockout mouse project.

Authors:  Christopher P Austin; James F Battey; Allan Bradley; Maja Bucan; Mario Capecchi; Francis S Collins; William F Dove; Geoffrey Duyk; Susan Dymecki; Janan T Eppig; Franziska B Grieder; Nathaniel Heintz; Geoff Hicks; Thomas R Insel; Alexandra Joyner; Beverly H Koller; K C Kent Lloyd; Terry Magnuson; Mark W Moore; Andras Nagy; Jonathan D Pollock; Allen D Roses; Arthur T Sands; Brian Seed; William C Skarnes; Jay Snoddy; Philippe Soriano; David J Stewart; Francis Stewart; Bruce Stillman; Harold Varmus; Lyuba Varticovski; Inder M Verma; Thomas F Vogt; Harald von Melchner; Jan Witkowski; Richard P Woychik; Wolfgang Wurst; George D Yancopoulos; Stephen G Young; Brian Zambrowicz
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 9.  ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering.

Authors:  Thomas Gaj; Charles A Gersbach; Carlos F Barbas
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 19.536

10.  A future of the model organism model.

Authors:  Jasper Rine
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.