Literature DB >> 33825953

Evidence-based orthopaedic trauma care in the United Kingdom: Guidelines, registries, carrots and sticks.

A Griffiths1, J Dixon2, A Egglestone3, A Edwards4, R Handley5, A Trompeter6, W G P Eardley3.   

Abstract

In the United Kingdom (UK), orthopaedic trauma surgeons utilise evidence-based practice through distillation of high-quality primary research, interrogation of registries and implementation of evidence-based guidelines. Concurrent with this ambition of providing exemplar care based on robust patient centred research, there has evolved a culture of remuneration 'by results'. Therefore, there is a drive for excellence combined with a system of collation and validation of data input as well as remuneration where care excels. There are several organisations involved in each stage of this process, the output of which has much that is pertinent to the globally similar consequences of physical injury. However, their relevance and impact within the UK is magnified as they are written against the backdrop of a unified healthcare system. In this article, we will describe the roles of the different organisations guiding and regulating trauma practice across the UK and discuss how the interplay of these impacts on clinical care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based medicine; Guidelines; Registries; Trauma

Year:  2021        PMID: 33825953     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-02954-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  11 in total

1.  Managing change in healthcare.

Authors:  Rashid Al-Abri
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2007-10

2.  Implementation of tranexamic acid for bleeding trauma patients: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Timothy J Coats; Marisol Fragoso-Iñiguez; Ian Roberts
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Does achieving the 'Best Practice Tariff' criteria for fractured neck of femur patients improve one year outcomes?

Authors:  Samuel R Whitaker; Sohail Nisar; Andrew J Scally; Graham S Radcliffe
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 4.  The value of trauma registries.

Authors:  Lynne Moore; David E Clark
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  The National Hip Fracture Database is only as good as the data we feed it - significant inaccuracy demonstrated and how to improve it.

Authors:  Lucy C Maling; Christian Eb Gray-Stephens; Khalid Malik-Tabassum; Oliver Jf Weiner; Matthew R Marples; Giles P Faria; Rory G Middleton
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  How to Validate Data Quality in a Trauma Registry? The Helsinki Trauma Registry Internal Audit.

Authors:  M Heinänen; T Brinck; R Lefering; L Handolin; T Söderlund
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.360

7.  Does achieving the best practice tariff improve outcomes in hip fracture patients? An observational cohort study.

Authors:  B Oakley; J Nightingale; C G Moran; I K Moppett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Improved Trauma Outcomes after the Introduction of a Trauma System in England.

Authors:  D J Lockey
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2018-08-20

9.  The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.

Authors:  Eric I Benchimol; Liam Smeeth; Astrid Guttmann; Katie Harron; David Moher; Irene Petersen; Henrik T Sørensen; Erik von Elm; Sinéad M Langan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  The changing face of major trauma in the UK.

Authors:  A Kehoe; J E Smith; A Edwards; D Yates; F Lecky
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  1 in total

1.  Orthopaedic education: a COVID-driven evolution.

Authors:  Alex Trompeter
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.