Literature DB >> 33825721

Identification of High-Risk Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Using Noninvasive Tests From Primary Care and Endocrinology Real-World Practices.

Zobair M Younossi1,2, Huong Pham1, Sean Felix1, Maria Stepanova3, Thomas Jeffers1,4, Elena Younossi1, Hussain Allawi1, Brian Lam1,4, Rebecca Cable1,4, Mariam Afendy1,4, Zahra Younoszai1,4, Arian Afendy1,4, Nila Rafiq1,2,4, Nahrain Alzubaidi2,4, Yasser Ousman2, Marc Bailey2, Zik Chris2, Maria Castillo-Catoni2, Pratima Fozdar2, Maria Ramirez2, Mehreen Husain2, Evis Hudson2, Ingrid Schneider1, Pegah Golabi1,2, Fatema Nader3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to identify high-risk nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients seen at the primary care and endocrinology practices and link them to gastrohepatology care.
METHODS: Using the electronic health record, patients who either had the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes or had 2 of 3 other metabolic risk factors met criteria for inclusion in the study. Using noninvasive fibrosis tests (NITs) to identify high risk of fibrosis, patients who met the NIT prespecified criteria were referred to gastrohepatology for clinical assessment and transient elastography.
RESULTS: From 7,555 patients initially screened, 1707 (22.6%) met the inclusion criteria, 716 (42%) agreed to enroll, and 184 (25.7%) met the prespecified NIT criteria and eligibility for linkage to GE-HEP where 103 patients (68 ± 9 years of age, 50% men, 56% white) agreed to undergo linkage assessments. Their NIT scores were APRI of 0.38 ± 0.24, FIB-4 of 1.98 ± 0.87, and NAFLD Fibrosis Score of 0.36 ± 1.03; 68 (66%) linked patients had controlled attenuation parameter >248 dB/m, 62 (60%) had liver stiffness <6 kPa, and 8 (8%) had liver stiffness >12 kPa. Liver stiffness for the overall group was 6.7 ± 4.2 kPa, controlled attenuation parameter 282 ± 64 dB/m, and FAST score 0.22 ± 0.22. Linked patients with presumed advanced fibrosis had significantly higher body mass index (36.4 ± 6.6 vs 31.2 ± 6.4 kg/m2, P = 0.025) and higher NIT scores (APRI 0.89 ± 0.52 vs 0.33 ± 0.14, FIB-4 3.21 ± 2.06 vs 1.88 ± 0.60, and NAFLD Fibrosis Score 1.58 ± 1.33 vs 0.25 ± 0.94). DISCUSSION: By applying a simple prespecified multistep algorithm using electronic health record with clinical risk factors and NITs followed by transient elastography, patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease seen in PCP and ENDO practices can be easily identified.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33825721     DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2155-384X            Impact factor:   4.488


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Review of the Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Efficacy of Anti-diabetic Drugs Used in the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Paul P Manka; Eda Kaya; Ali Canbay; Wing-Kin Syn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Hyperuricemia Is Associated with Significant Liver Fibrosis in Subjects with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, but Not in Subjects without It.

Authors:  Pei-Chia Yen; Yu-Tsung Chou; Chung-Hao Li; Zih-Jie Sun; Chih-Hsing Wu; Yin-Fan Chang; Feng-Hwa Lu; Yi-Ching Yang; Chih-Jen Chang; Jin-Shang Wu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  Epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Zobair M Younossi; Linda Henry
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2021-05-11

4.  An exploration of barriers and facilitators to implementing a nonalcoholic fatty liver disease pathway for people with type 2 diabetes in primary care.

Authors:  Lucy Gracen; Kelly L Hayward; Melanie Aikebuse; Suzanne Williams; Anthony Russell; James O'Beirne; Elizabeth E Powell; Patricia C Valery
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.213

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.