Literature DB >> 33825019

Learning curve of robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

Omar Yusef Kudsi1, Naseem Bou-Ayash2, Fahri Gokcal2, Allison S Crawford3, Sebastian K Chung3, Alexandra Chudner2, Demetrius Litwin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP-IHR) is a safe and feasible approach for hernias of varying etiology. We aim to present a single surgeon's learning curve (LC) of this technique based on operative times, while accounting for bilaterality and complexity.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent rTAPP-IHR over a period of 5 years. Patients who underwent primary, recurrent, and complex (previous posterior repair, previous prostatectomy, scrotal, incarcerated) repairs were included. Cumulative and risk-adjusted cumulative sum analyses (CUSUM and RA-CUSUM) were used to depict the evolution of skin-to-skin times and complications/surgical site events (SSEs) with time, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 371 patients were included in the study. Mean skin-to-skin times were stratified according to four subgroups: unilateral non-complex (46.8 min), unilateral complex (63.2 min), bilateral non-complex (70.9 min), and bilateral complex (102 min). A CUSUM-LC was then plotted using each procedures difference in operative time from its subgroup mean. The peak of the plot occurred at case number 138, which was used as a transition between 'early' and 'late' phases. The average operative time for the late phase was 15.9 min shorter than the early phase (p < 0.001). The RA-CUSUM, plotted using the weight of case complexity and unilateral/bilateral status, also showed decreasing SSE rates after the completion of 138 cases (early phase: 8.8% vs. late phase: 2.2%, p = 0.008). Overall complication rates did not differ significantly between the two phases.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that regardless of bilateral or complex status, rTAPP operative times and SSE rates gradually decreased after completing 138 procedures. Previous laparoscopic experience, robotic team efficiency, and surgical knowledge are important considerations for a surgeon's LC.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Groin hernia; Learning curve; Minimally invasive; Robotics; TAPP

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33825019     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08462-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?

Authors:  Paulos Yohannes; Paul Rotariu; Peter Pinto; Arthur D Smith; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R Wolswijk; R P Zweemer; M P Schijven; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.

Authors:  Venita Chandra; Deepika Nehra; Richard Parent; Russell Woo; Rosette Reyes; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sanjeev Dutta
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)].

Authors:  R Bittner; M E Arregui; T Bisgaard; M Dudai; G S Ferzli; R J Fitzgibbons; R H Fortelny; U Klinge; F Kockerling; E Kuhry; J Kukleta; D Lomanto; M C Misra; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; W Reinpold; J Rosenberg; S Sauerland; C Schug-Pass; K Singh; M Timoney; D Weyhe; P Chowbey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Andrew Iraniha; Joshua Peloquin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-07-13

6.  Teaching and training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): impact of the learning curve on patient outcome.

Authors:  Ulf Bökeler; Jochen Schwarz; Reinhard Bittner; Steffi Zacheja; Constantin Smaxwil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jose E Escobar Dominguez; Michael Gonzalez Ramos; Rupa Seetharamaiah; Charan Donkor; Jorge Rabaza; Anthony Gonzalez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Achieving the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair by Tapp: A Quality Improvement Study.

Authors:  Umberto Bracale; Giovanni Merola; Antonio Sciuto; Giuseppe Cavallaro; Jacopo Andreuccetti; Giusto Pignata
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.533

9.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The learning curve for laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy by moving average.

Authors:  Jong Won Lim; Jin Yong Lee; Sang Eok Lee; Ju Ik Moon; Yu Mi Ra; In Seok Choi; Won Jun Choi; Dae Sung Yoon; Hyun Sik Min
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-07-25
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of perioperative and mid-term outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Omar Yusef Kudsi; Naseem Bou-Ayash; Georges Kaoukabani; Fahri Gokcal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  How to Establish the Bipolar Forceps Dissection Method in Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Takuya Saito; Yasuyuki Fukami; Shunichiro Komatsu; Kenitiro Kaneko; Tsuyoshi Sano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-12-14

3.  Reply to Rakovich et al.

Authors:  Natasha Toleska Dimitrovska; Xiao Chu; Wentao Li
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

Review 4.  [Robotic hernia repair : Part II: Robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair (rv-TAPP and r-Rives or r-TARUP). Video report and results of a series of 118 patients].

Authors:  Johannes Baur; Michaela Ramser; Nicola Keller; Filip Muysoms; Jörg Dörfer; Armin Wiegering; Lukas Eisner; Ulrich A Dietz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Robotic hernia repair II. English version : Robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair (rv‑TAPP and r‑Rives or r‑TARUP). Video report and results of a series of 118 patients.

Authors:  Johannes Baur; Michaela Ramser; Nicola Keller; Filip Muysoms; Jörg Dörfer; Armin Wiegering; Lukas Eisner; Ulrich A Dietz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 0.955

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.