Literature DB >> 28707149

Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair.

Andrew Iraniha1, Joshua Peloquin2.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair is an established alternative to open hernia repair, which offers equivalent outcomes with less postoperative pain and faster recovery. Unfortunately, it remains technically challenging, requiring advanced laparoscopic skills which have limited its popularity among surgeons. The robotic platform has the potential to overcome these challenges. The objective of this study was to examine the long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair, since these data have not been reported up to now. From October 2012 to October 2015, 159 inguinal hernias in 82 consecutive patients were repaired with 3D mesh (BARD) using da Vinci Si Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The patients' demographics and intraoperative data were documented. Patients were seen 2 and 6 weeks after the surgery and the complications were recorded. Patients were assessed 6 weeks after the surgery by a survey using a universal pain assessment tool to document their post-operative pain, narcotic use and time of return to work and exercise. A modified short form 12 (SF 12) was also sent out to the patients 12-36 months after the surgery to measure their health-related quality of life prior to surgery and at the 12- to 36-month follow-up, and to document any evidence of recurrence. Postoperative health-related quality of life scores were compared to the pre-operative baseline quality of life scores using the unpaired t test. Over the course of 3 years, 159 robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair were performed in 82 patients, 73 men and 9 women by one surgeon as an outpatient basis. The mean age was 53 and mean body mass index was 26. There were no intraoperative complications or conversions. The average operative time was 99 min. Four patients developed urinary retention post-operatively and one patient developed postoperative bowel obstruction requiring laparoscopic lysis of adhesion with no long-term complications. All patients completed the pain assessment survey and the median pain score, 3 days after the surgery was 3. Narcotics were used for an average of 3.1 days. The modified SF 12 survey assessing for quality of life before and 12-36 months after surgery was completed and returned by 29 patients (response rate of 35.4% and median follow-up of 32 months). Only one recurrence was reported which was repaired with open technique. The analysis of the SF 12 survey that evaluated patient's quality of life, pain score and the ability to perform activities of daily living before and after surgery revealed a significant improvement in those measures 12-36 months after the surgery compare to their baseline. Hernia recurrence, chronic pain and physical impairment are the major long-term concerns after any type of inguinal hernia repair. Our results demonstrate that robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair appears to be a technically feasible, reproducible and safe minimally invasive alternative with low recurrence, low chronic pain and high health-related quality of life in the long term.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hernia repair; Inguinal hernia repair; Long-term follow-up; Quality of life; Robotic assisted TAAP inguinal hernia repair; da Vinci Si surgical system

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28707149     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0727-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  12 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: gold standard in bilateral hernia repair? Results of more than 2800 patients in comparison to literature.

Authors:  Constantin Aurel Wauschkuhn; Jochen Schwarz; Ulf Boekeler; Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques.

Authors:  R Bittner; J Schwarz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)].

Authors:  R Bittner; M E Arregui; T Bisgaard; M Dudai; G S Ferzli; R J Fitzgibbons; R H Fortelny; U Klinge; F Kockerling; E Kuhry; J Kukleta; D Lomanto; M C Misra; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; W Reinpold; J Rosenberg; S Sauerland; C Schug-Pass; K Singh; M Timoney; D Weyhe; P Chowbey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Management of indirect inguinal hernias by laparoscopic closure of the neck of the sac.

Authors:  R Ger; K Monroe; R Duvivier; A Mishrick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Current practices of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  M Trevisonno; P Kaneva; Y Watanabe; G M Fried; L S Feldman; A Andalib; M C Vassiliou
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Transition from Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair to Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Review of a Single Surgeon's Experience.

Authors:  Omar Yusef Kudsi; Justin C McCarty; Nivedh Paluvoi; Allan S Mabardy
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jose E Escobar Dominguez; Michael Gonzalez Ramos; Rupa Seetharamaiah; Charan Donkor; Jorge Rabaza; Anthony Gonzalez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Technique and Early Experience.

Authors:  Massimo Arcerito; Eric Changchien; Oscar Bernal; Adam Konkoly-Thege; John Moon
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost.

Authors:  J Wellwood; M J Sculpher; D Stoker; G J Nicholls; C Geddes; A Whitehead; R Singh; D Spiegelhalter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-11
View more
  18 in total

1.  Pain outcomes and recovery after robotic laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Mark C Kendall; Lucas J Castro-Alves
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-03-15

2.  Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is superior to open: a national database review.

Authors:  B Pokala; P R Armijo; L Flores; D Hennings; D Oleynikov
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.

Authors:  A Aiolfi; M Cavalli; G Micheletto; F Lombardo; G Bonitta; A Morlacchi; P G Bruni; G Campanelli; D Bona
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Aiolfi; M Cavalli; G Micheletto; P G Bruni; F Lombardo; C Perali; G Bonitta; D Bona
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is primarily performed by specialized surgeons: a scoping review.

Authors:  Danni Lip Hansen; Anders Gram-Hanssen; Siv Fonnes; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-07-05

6.  First 100 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs at a Veterans Affairs hospital.

Authors:  Alyssa K Kosturakis; Kathryn E LaRusso; Nels D Carroll; Michael B Nicholl
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-03

7.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic groin hernia repair: observational case-control study on the operative time during the learning curve.

Authors:  Filip Muysoms; Stijn Van Cleven; Iris Kyle-Leinhase; Conrad Ballecer; Archana Ramaswamy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ajita S Prabhu; Alfredo Carbonell; William Hope; Jeremy Warren; Rana Higgins; Brian Jacob; Jeffrey Blatnik; Ivy Haskins; Hemasat Alkhatib; Luciano Tastaldi; Aldo Fafaj; Chao Tu; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Learning curve of robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

Authors:  Omar Yusef Kudsi; Naseem Bou-Ayash; Fahri Gokcal; Allison S Crawford; Sebastian K Chung; Alexandra Chudner; Demetrius Litwin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison between robotic and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Caucasian patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fenglin Zhao; Baoshan Wang; Jie Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.