Literature DB >> 33824881

IMPACT OF OPEN ENROLLMENT IN COURSE-BASED UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCES WITH AT-RISK STUDENT POPULATIONS.

Lourdes E Echegoyen1,2,3, Stephen B Aley3,4, John P Garza3, Corin Ramos3,5, Sandra L Oviedo3,5, Guadalupe Corral3,5.   

Abstract

Participation in authentic research activities, particularly mentored undergraduate research experiences, at the University of Texas at El Paso has long been associated with student success measures such as graduation and matriculation to strong graduate programs in STEM. However, these opportunities typically are available to upper division students, despite evidence suggesting that the first (Freshman) year at university is determinant for individuals to complete STEM degrees. To expand the number of research opportunities and to extend them preferentially to new, entering students, we established the Freshman Year Research Intensive Sequence (FYRIS) in 2015, a course sequence consisting of a research foundations course and one or two laboratory courses redesigned by faculty into small, special topic Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs). CUREs provide authentic research experiences with similar early-, middle-, and late-term benefits to those found in traditional mentored experiences. Several of these benefits can be conceptualized as "hubs", which derive from earlier benefits, while facilitating later positive outcomes. Self-efficacy is one such hub, while retention and persistence in science enrollment represent late-phase positive outcomes. In this report, we examined self-efficacy of FYRIS participants in surveys administered at the start and end of each course to assess their confidence in conducting fundamental and specific research activities in the foundations and research driven courses, respectively. Specific items from a validated survey were used in addition to items developed for each course based on specific learning objectives. Retention was measured across three years of assessment of participants and non-participants, controlling for key scholastic characteristics. Results on retention rates after FYRIS vary depending on whether students fully or partially participated in the course-sequence. Results will be presented for three cohorts of students: 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Course-based Research; Freshman Retention; Research Self-Efficacy; Undergraduate Research

Year:  2019        PMID: 33824881      PMCID: PMC8021126     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EDULEARN Proc        ISSN: 2340-1117


  5 in total

1.  Whole genome sequencing in the undergraduate classroom: outcomes and lessons from a pilot course.

Authors:  Jennifer C Drew; Eric W Triplett
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2008-12-17

2.  Undergraduate research. Genomics Education Partnership.

Authors:  D Lopatto; C Alvarez; D Barnard; C Chandrasekaran; H-M Chung; C Du; T Eckdahl; A L Goodman; C Hauser; C J Jones; O R Kopp; G A Kuleck; G McNeil; R Morris; J L Myka; A Nagengast; P J Overvoorde; J L Poet; K Reed; G Regisford; D Revie; A Rosenwald; K Saville; M Shaw; G R Skuse; C Smith; M Smith; M Spratt; J Stamm; J S Thompson; B A Wilson; C Witkowski; J Youngblom; W Leung; C D Shaffer; J Buhler; E Mardis; S C R Elgin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Modeling course-based undergraduate research experiences: an agenda for future research and evaluation.

Authors:  Lisa A Corwin; Mark J Graham; Erin L Dolan
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive.

Authors:  Gita Bangera; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  The Undergraduate Research Student Self-Assessment (URSSA): Validation for Use in Program Evaluation.

Authors:  Timothy J Weston; Sandra L Laursen
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.325

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.