Literature DB >> 33822922

Immediate post-procedural functional assessment of percutaneous coronary intervention: current evidence and future directions.

Daixin Ding1,2, Jiayue Huang1,2, Jelmer Westra3, David Joel Cohen4, Yundai Chen5, Birgitte Krogsgaard Andersen3, Niels Ramsing Holm3, Bo Xu6, Shengxian Tu2,7, William Wijns1.   

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by coronary physiology provides symptomatic benefit and improves patient outcomes. Nevertheless, over one-fourth of patients still experience recurrent angina or major adverse cardiac events following the index procedure. Coronary angiography, the current workhorse for evaluating PCI efficacy, has limited ability to identify suboptimal PCI results. Accumulating evidence supports the usefulness of immediate post-procedural functional assessment. This review discusses the incidence and possible mechanisms behind a suboptimal physiology immediately after PCI. Furthermore, we summarize the current evidence base supporting the usefulness of immediate post-PCI functional assessment for evaluating PCI effectiveness, guiding PCI optimization, and predicting clinical outcomes. Multiple observational studies and post hoc analyses of datasets from randomized trials demonstrated that higher post-PCI functional results are associated with better clinical outcomes as well as a reduced rate of residual angina and repeat revascularization. As such, post-PCI functional assessment is anticipated to impact patient management, secondary prevention, and resource utilization. Pre-PCI physiological guidance has been shown to improve clinical outcomes and reduce health care costs. Whether similar benefits can be achieved using post-PCI physiological assessment requires evaluation in randomized clinical outcome trials. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fractional flow reserve; Myocardial ischaemia; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Post-procedural functional assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33822922     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  6 in total

1.  Angiographic Lesion Morphology Provides Incremental Value to Generalize Quantitative Flow Ratio for Predicting Myocardial Ischemia.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Na Zhao; Bo Xu; Lihua Xie; Weihua Yin; Yunqiang An; Hankun Yan; Yitong Yu; Bin Lu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-06

2.  Impact of diabetes on coronary physiology evaluated by quantitative flow ratio in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Zhen Ye; Qin Chen; Jiaxin Zhong; Long Chen; Lihua Chen; Mingfang Ye; Yuanming Yan; Lianglong Chen; Yukun Luo
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 3.  Fractional Flow Reserve: Patient Selection and Perspectives.

Authors:  Joyce Peper; Leonie M Becker; Jan-Peter van Kuijk; Tim Leiner; Martin J Swaans
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2021-12-14

4.  Triglyceride-glucose index is associated with quantitative flow ratio in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Bingyan Yu; Yuhao Mo; Xiangming Hu; Weimian Wang; Jieliang Liu; Junguo Jin; Ziheng Lun; Ci Ren Luo Bu; Haojian Dong; Yingling Zhou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-08

5.  Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry.

Authors:  Antonio Maria Leone; Stefano Migliaro; Giuseppe Zimbardo; Pio Cialdella; Eloisa Basile; Domenico Galante; Federico Di Giusto; Gianluca Anastasia; Andrea Vicere; Edoardo Petrolati; Antonio Di Stefano; Giorgia Campaniello; Domenico D'Amario; Rocco Vergallo; Rocco Antonio Montone; Antonino Buffon; Enrico Romagnoli; Cristina Aurigemma; Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-18

6.  Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR).

Authors:  Damien Collison; Matthaios Didagelos; Muhammad Aetesam-Ur-Rahman; Samuel Copt; Robert McDade; Peter McCartney; Thomas J Ford; John McClure; Mitchell Lindsay; Aadil Shaukat; Paul Rocchiccioli; Richard Brogan; Stuart Watkins; Margaret McEntegart; Richard Good; Keith Robertson; Patrick O'Boyle; Andrew Davie; Adnan Khan; Stuart Hood; Hany Eteiba; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 29.983

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.