| Literature DB >> 36158820 |
Bingyan Yu1,2, Yuhao Mo1, Xiangming Hu2, Weimian Wang2, Jieliang Liu2, Junguo Jin2, Ziheng Lun2, Ci Ren Luo Bu3, Haojian Dong2, Yingling Zhou2,1.
Abstract
Background: The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is a novel marker representing the degree of insulin resistance (IR) and is closely related to cardiovascular diseases. However, the association between the TyG index and vascular function in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unknown. Materials and methods: This study was a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study. In this study, patients with STEMI who underwent PCI were included, and coronary angiography data were analyzed by Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and quantitative flow ratio (QFR). In addition, the TyG index was calculated as follows: Ln [fasting triglyceride (mg/dl) × fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) × 1/2]. According to the post-PCI QFR, patients were divided into two groups: post-PCI QFR ≤ 0.92 group and post-PCI QFR > 0.92 group. Construction of logistic regression model to explore the relationship between the TyG index and post-PCI QFR.Entities:
Keywords: ST-elevation myocardial infarction; fasting blood glucose; percutaneous coronary intervention; quantitative flow ratio; triglyceride-glucose index
Year: 2022 PMID: 36158820 PMCID: PMC9493184 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1002030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Baseline characteristics.
| Total | Post-PCI QFR ≤ 0.92 | Post-PCI QFR > 0.92 | ||
| Age, years | 62 ± 12 | 61 ± 11 | 63 ± 12 | 0.184 |
| Male | 203 (84.2) | 78 (86.7) | 125 (82.8) | 0.469 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.18 ± 3.53 | 24.28 ± 3.78 | 24.11 ± 3.38 | 0.721 |
| LVEF, % | 49.3 ± 11.4 | 46.7 ± 12.0 | 50.9 ± 10.8 |
|
|
| ||||
| Smoking | 110 (45.6) | 38 (42.2) | 72 (47.7) | 0.426 |
| Hypertension | 106 (44.0) | 42 (46.7) | 64 (42.2) | 0.592 |
| DM | 33 (13.7) | 13 (14.4) | 20 (13.2) | 0.847 |
| Family history of CAD | 4 (1.7) | 1 (1.1) | 3 (2.0) | 1.000 |
| Previous myocardial infarction | 27 (11.2) | 10 (11.1) | 17 (11.3) | 1.000 |
| Peripheral vascular disease | 5 (2.1) | 0 (0) | 5 (3.3) | 0.160 |
| O to D, hours | 9.23 ± 11.58 | 9.25 ± 13.11 | 9.23 ± 10.61 | 0.990 |
| STEMI types |
| |||
| Anterior | 124 (51.5) | 58 (64.4) | 66 (43.7) | |
| Non-anterior | 117 (48.5) | 32 (35.6) | 85 (56.3) | |
|
| ||||
| FBG, mmol/L | 8.78 ± 3.98 | 9.62 ± 4.49 | 8.27 ± 3.57 |
|
| Creatine, mmol/L | 86.91 ± 72.92 | 80.91 ± 34.01 | 90.49 ± 88.25 | 0.325 |
| TG, mmol/L | 2.20 ± 1.75 | 2.42 ± 1.94 | 2.07 ± 1.62 | 0.139 |
| TC, mmol/L | 4.58 ± 1.74 | 4.56 ± 1.91 | 4.59 ± 1.63 | 0.889 |
| HDL-C, mmol/L | 1.07 ± 0.28 | 1.04 ± 0.22 | 1.09 ± 0.30 | 0.182 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 3.37 ± 0.93 | 3.46 ± 1.07 | 3.31 ± 0.84 | 0.250 |
| Peak CK-MB, U/L | 284.56 ± 388.97 | 249.60 ± 216.61 | 305.39 ± 461.59 | 0.282 |
| Peak TnT, pg/mL | 8919.4 ± 45512.1 | 5258.7 ± 3403.3 | 10129.3 ± 57432.2 | 0.303 |
| Peak NT-proBNP, pg/mL | 3201.0 ± 8043.9 | 2916.1 ± 4866.0 | 3370.8 ± 9455.2 | 0.672 |
| TyG index | 9.31 ± 0.79 | 9.50 ± 0.82 | 9.21 ± 0.75 |
|
PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; QFR, quantitative flow ratio; BMI, body mass index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; DM, diabetes mellitus; CAD, coronary artery disease; O to D, time from onset to door; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction; FBG, fasting blood glucose; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CK-MB, peak creatine kinase isoenzyme MB; TnT, troponin T; NT-proBNP, N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide; TyG, triglyceride-glucose.
Bold term and * indicates statistically significant.
Coronary characteristics.
| Total | Post-PCI QFR ≤ 0.92 | Post-PCI QFR > 0.92 | ||
| Culprit vessel |
| |||
| LAD | 124 (51.5) | 58 (64.4) | 66 (43.7) | |
| LCX | 14 (5.8) | 4 (4.4) | 10 (6.6) | |
| RCA | 103 (42.7) | 28 (31.1) | 75 (49.7) | |
|
| ||||
| Reference vessel diameter, mm | 2.94 ± 0.86 | 2.89 ± 0.84 | 2.97 ± 0.88 | 0.463 |
| Minimal lumen diameter, mm | 1.07 ± 0.59 | 1.05 ± 0.57 | 1.08 ± 0.61 | 0.788 |
| Diameter stenosis, % | 63.1 ± 17.1 | 63.2 ± 16.0 | 63.0 ± 17.7 | 0.939 |
| lesion length, mm | 14.3 ± 6.5 | 13.4 ± 5.4 | 14.8 ± 7.0 | 0.103 |
|
| ||||
| In-stent reference vessel diameter, mm | 3.12 ± 0.61 | 3.04 ± 0.51 | 3.17 ± 0.67 | 0.125 |
| In-stent minimal lumen diameter, mm | 2.54 ± 0.59 | 2.40 ± 0.55 | 2.63 ± 0.60 |
|
| In-stent diameter stenosis, % | 18.6 ± 11.3 | 21.2 ± 13.5 | 17.1 ± 9.4 |
|
| Stent length, mm | 24.4 ± 16.1 | 28.0 ± 16.1 | 30.3 ± 16.1 | 0.277 |
| Pre-PCI QFR | 0.40 ± 0.40 | 0.37 ± 0.37 | 0.41 ± 0.41 | 0.418 |
| Post-PCI QFR | 0.93 ± 0.08 | 0.87 ± 0.11 | 0.96 ± 0.02 |
|
LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCX, Left circumflex artery; RCA, right coronary artery; QCA, quantitative coronary angiography; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; QFR, quantitative flow ratio.
Bold term and * indicates statistically significant.
Association of TyG index with the risk of post-PCI QFR ≤ 0.92 in logistic regression models.
| OR | 95% CI | ||
|
| |||
| TyG, per 1-unit increase | 1.611 | 1.142–2.273 |
|
|
| |||
| TyG, per 1-unit increase | 1.611 | 1.142–2.273 |
|
|
| |||
| TyG, per 1-unit increase | 1.672 | 1.177–2.374 |
|
|
| |||
| TyG, per 1-unit increase | 1.697 | 1.171–2.460 |
|
Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, and BMI.
Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, BMI, LVEF, smoking, hypertension, DM, previous myocardial infarction, and creatine.
Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, BMI, LVEF, smoking, hypertension, DM, previous myocardial infarction, creatine, culprit vessel, length of stents, in-stent minimal lumen diameter and in-stent diameter stenosis.
TyG, triglyceride-glucose; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; DM, diabetes mellitus; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; QFR, quantitative flow ratio.
Bold term and * indicates statistically significant.
FIGURE 1Multivariable adjusted OR for the risk of post-PCI QFR ≤ 0.92 according to levels of TyG index on a continuous scale. Odds ratios and 95% CIs derived from restricted cubic spline regression, with knots placed at the 5th, 35th, 65th, and 95th percentiles of the distribution of TyG index. The reference point for TyG index is located at OR = 1. Ref represents the level of TyG index at increased risk of post-PCI QFR ≤ 0.92. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, LVEF, smoking, hypertension, DM, previous myocardial infarction, creatine, culprit vessel, length of stents, in-stent minimal lumen diameter and in-stent diameter stenosis. OR, odds ratio; QFR, quantitative flow ratio; TyG, triglyceride-glucose; BMI, body mass index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; DM, diabetes mellitus; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; CI: confidence interval.
FIGURE 2Forest plot investigating the association between the TyG index and with the risk of post-PCI QFR ≤ 0.92 in different subgroups. TyG, triglyceride-glucose; QFR, quantitative flow ratio; BMI, body mass index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; DM, diabetes mellitus; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.