| Literature DB >> 33822137 |
Jacob B Landis1,2, Christopher M Miller3, Amanda K Broz3, Alexandra A Bennett2, Noelia Carrasquilla-Garcia4, Douglas R Cook4, Robert L Last5,6, Patricia A Bedinger3, Gaurav D Moghe2,5.
Abstract
Evolutionary dynamics at the population level play a central role in creating the diversity of life on our planet. In this study, we sought to understand the origins of such population-level variation in mating systems and defensive acylsugar chemistry in Solanum habrochaites-a wild tomato species found in diverse Andean habitats in Ecuador and Peru. Using Restriction-site-Associated-DNA-Sequencing (RAD-seq) of 50 S. habrochaites accessions, we identified eight population clusters generated via isolation and hybridization dynamics of 4-6 ancestral populations. Detailed characterization of mating systems of these clusters revealed emergence of multiple self-compatible (SC) groups from progenitor self-incompatible populations in the northern part of the species range. Emergence of these SC groups was also associated with fixation of deleterious alleles inactivating acylsugar acetylation. The Amotape-Huancabamba Zone-a geographical landmark in the Andes with high endemism and isolated microhabitats-was identified as a major driver of differentiation in the northern species range, whereas large geographical distances contributed to population structure and evolution of a novel SC group in the central and southern parts of the range, where the species was also inferred to have originated. Findings presented here highlight the role of the diverse ecogeography of Peru and Ecuador in generating population differentiation, and enhance our understanding of the microevolutionary processes that create biological diversity.Entities:
Keywords: RAD-seq; biodiversity; mating systems; metabolic evolution; plant evolution; population genomics
Year: 2021 PMID: 33822137 PMCID: PMC8321546 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Evol ISSN: 0737-4038 Impact factor: 16.240
Fig. 1.Population structure of Solanum habrochaites. (A, C) Population structure plots obtained using K = 4 and K = 6 as predefined number of genetic clusters using Set 1 SNPs. Population cluster numbers as per figure 2 are noted below the bar plot in (C). (B) Cross-entropy criterion showing K = 4 as the optimal number of genetically differentiated ancestral populations. (D) Principal components analysis, with populations defined based on K = 6. Color corresponds to the major ancestral population predicted in subfigure C.
Fig. 2.Coalescent and migration analysis. (A) Results of coalescent analysis using SNAPP, obtained using markers shared between all sampled individuals. LA2975 was left out from this analysis because its level of heterozygosity was >3× the next highest sample, suggesting possible contamination or other unexplained behavior. AHZ, Amotape-Huancabamba Zone; HD, Huancabamba Depression. Population cluster numbers are marked within the phylogeny. Region names in red as per Sifres et al. (2011) and do not represent provinces. (B) A split network of the population clusters shows close relationships within the northern and within southern clusters and significant variation in the Cajamarca and Huancabamba accessions. Significant incongruencies are seen for clusters 4–6 and three accessions of cluster 8. AHZ, Amotape-Huancabamba Zone.
Reproductive Traits for Solanum habrochaites Accessions.
| Accession | Mating System and SC Group | S-RNase Protein |
| HT Protein | Interpop pollen-side | Interpop pistil-side | UI | RAD-Seq Cluster |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA4656 | SC-2 | N |
| Y | Y | N | Y | na |
| LA1624 | SC-2 | N |
| Y | Y | N | Y | C1b |
| PI129157 | SC-2 | N |
| Y | Y | N | Y | C1 |
| LA1625 | SC-2 | N |
| Y | Y | N | Y | C1 |
| LA1266 | SC-1 | N |
| Y | N | N | Y | na |
| PI134417 | SC-2 | N |
| Y | nt | N | nt | C1 |
| LA1264 | SC-1 | N |
| Y | N | N | Y | na |
| PI390515 | SC-2/3 | N |
| N | Y | N | N | C1 |
| LA0407 | SC-2 | N |
| Y | Y | N | Y | C1 |
| LA1223 | SC-3 | N |
| N | N | N | N | C1 |
| PI251305 | SC-1/2/3 | Y |
| N | N | Y | Y | C1 |
| LA4654 | SC-6 | N | Unknown | Y | N | N | Y | na |
| LA4655 | SC-6 | N | Unknown | low | N | N | Y | na |
| LA2119 | SC-1 | N |
| Y | N | N | Y | C2 |
| LA2868 | SI | Y | Multiple | Y | N | Y | Y | C1 |
| LA2128 | SC-1 | N |
| Y | N | N | Y | C2 |
| LA1252 | SC-1 | N |
| Y | N | N | Y | C2 |
| LA2855 | MP | Y | Multiple | Y | N | Y | Y | C3 |
| LA2106 | SC-1 | N |
| Y | N | N | Y | C2 |
| LA2101 | SC-5 | N | Unknown | Y | N | N | Y | C3 |
| LA2860 | SC-5 | N | Unknown | Y | N | N | Y | C2 |
| LA2864 | SI | Y | Multiple | Y | N | Y | Y | C3 |
| LA2099 | MP | Y | Multiple | Y | N | Y | Y | C3 |
| LA2098 | MP | Y | Multiple | Y | N | Y | Y | C3 |
| LA2175 | MP | Y | Multiple | Y | N | Y | Y | C5 |
| LA1391 | MP | Y | Multiple | Y | N | Y | Y | C4 |
| LA2314 | SI | Y | Multiple | Y | N | Y | Y | na |
| LA1353 | SI | Y | Multiple | Y | N | Y | Y | na |
| LA1777 | SI | Y | Multiple | Y | N | Y | Y | C7 |
| LA0094 | MP | Y | Multiple | Y | N | Y | Y | C8 |
| LA1560 | SC-4 | Y |
| nt | N | nt | nt | C8 |
| LA1753 | SC-4 | Y |
| Y | N | nt | nt | C8 |
| LA1691 | SC-4 | Y |
| nt | N | nt | Y | C8 |
| LA1927 | SC-4 | Y |
| Y | Y | Y | Y | C8 |
Note.—Reproductive traits documented for each accession include mating system as detected by fruit production after self-pollination and/or pollen tube growth analysis (SC, self-compatible; SI, self-incompatible); expression of S-RNase protein as detected by immunoblotting; S-RNase allele as detected by allele-specific PCR. Expression of HT protein as detected by immunoblotting; pollen-side interpopulation reproductive barriers as detected by pollen tube growth in crosses with pollen from different accessions onto pistils of SI accession LA1777 (Y = pollen tubes rejected, N = pollen tubes accepted); pistil-side interpopulation barriers as detected by pollen tube growth with pollen of SC accession LA0407 onto pistils of different accessions (Y = pollen rejected, N = pollen accepted); interspecific unilateral incompatibility (UI) detected by pollen tube growth in crosses using cultivar (Solanum lycopersicum) pollen onto pistils of different accessions (Y = pollen tubes rejected, N = pollen tubes accepted); and SC group based on the combination of reproductive traits and S-RNase allele present.
Data from Broz, Randle, et al. (2017).
By inference, due to either TSS data or due to geographic location, na = not applicable because no accessions from this region were included in the RAD-seq analysis, nt = not tested. Unshaded portion of the table shows accessions from Ecuador and shaded portion of the table shows accessions from Peru.
Presence of LhgSRN-1 allele detected at a low frequency.
Mating system reported here differs from TGRC designation.
Data from Covey et al. (2010).
Fig. 3.Mating system and population structure in Solanum habrochaites. (A) Population structure plot incorporating accessions analyzed using RAD-seq and TSS organized in a north to south array from left to right. Coalescent cluster IDs are noted at the top of the structure plot. Mating systems indicated include SC groups 1–6 (table 1), Mixed Population (MP) accessions containing both SI and SC individuals as well as purely SI accessions (SI). #, mating system not assessed. Where known, specific S-RNase alleles associated with accessions are indicated. *accessions containing the LhgSRN-1 S-RNase allele, ^accessions containing the hab-7 S-RNase allele, **S-RNase allele unknown, and multiple (M) S-RNase alleles are found in SI and MP accessions. (B) Map of Ecuador and Peru displaying the locations of accessions with different mating systems as shown in (A) and listed in table 1.
Fig. 4.Analysis of population relatedness and demographic events (A) Observed heterozygosity estimates based on all genome-wide RAD mapping sites, for individuals classified by their geographic regions. Northeastern Loja and Western Loja all comprise individuals assigned to clusters 2 and 3, respectively. Number in green above the boxplot corresponds to the median heterozygosity from this study, while those in red below the region names correspond to SSR marker estimates of observed heterozygosity as per Sifres et al. (2011). (B) Estimates of pairwise dxy and Fst between SNAPP coalescent clusters. Cells are colored on a continuous scale from blue (high) to pink (low), with yellow/green (intermediate high); orange (intermediate low) colors as intermediate. (C) Unrooted tree based on the dxy matrix shows differentiation between clusters that follows the two SNAPP superclusters. Branch-wise dxy values are shown; Fst tree shown in supplementary figure S8, Supplementary Material online. (D–F) Isolation by distance analysis considering all S. habrochaites individuals, as well as those in Supercluster 1 and Supercluster 2. Mantel’s test P-values were estimated using 100,000 simulated permutations of the Set 2 SNPs.
Fig. 5.Acylsugar phenotypes across Solanum habrochaites accessions and the genotypes of two associated enzymes. Heatmap of acylsugar peak areas normalized to the internal standard peak area and the maximum area per column. Rows and columns are arranged based on figure 2 and types of acylsugars, respectively. Accessions are colored by their population cluster assignments, using color scheme used in figure 2. Three accessions in bold are the geographically misplaced accessions. ASAT4 inactivation chemotypes (A–E) as per Kim et al. (2012) are also shown. Note that A, B have acetylated acylsugars and C, D, E contain only nonacetylated acylsugars, due to ASAT4 loss. Column names are in the format (peakID-identified acylsugar). Acylsugars with asterisks indicate those predicted based on MS1 peak and Kim et al. (2012) study without high-confidence MS/MS patterns.
Fig. 6.Overall model for Solanum habrochaites evolution. This model is based on integrative analysis of the data presented in this paper. Color names noted are as per the colors used in figure 2. Region names refer to the ecogeographic groups of accessions based on Sifres et al. (2011). **The predicted origin region of S. habrochaites is also likely the northernmost boundary of its sister species Solanum pennellii. Fifty-three out of 56 S. pennellii accessions in TGRC are present south of this region.