Literature DB >> 3382037

A random survey of anesthesia machines and ancillary monitors in 45 hospitals.

V Kumar1, M S Hintze, A M Jacob.   

Abstract

One hundred sixty-nine anesthesia machines and ancillary monitors were tested in 45 hospitals, randomly selected to assure a sample of hospitals with a wide range of anesthesia workload. The machines ranged in age from 1 to 28 years (8 +/- 6, mean +/- SD), with 47.3% manufactured since 1980, 39.1% between 1970 and 1980; and 13.6% before 1970. Regular maintenance was provided for 112 machines (66.2%) by the manufacturer, whereas 55 machines (32.5%) were maintained by independent contractors. Two machines designated as backup machines received no maintenance. There was no source of oxygen to back up oxygen piped from a central source on five machines. Thirteen machines had leaks over 500 ml/min distal to the common gas outlet, the most common sites being the carbon dioxide absorber, dome valves, and oxygen monitor sensor adaptors. Another two machines had leaks over 500 ml/min proximal to the common gas outlet. Forty-two of the 169 machines did not have an oxygen analyzer; another 18 had oxygen analyzers that did not function properly. Only 29 (23.5%) of 123 machines equipped with a ventilator had a working high-pressure alarm, whereas functioning low-pressure alarms were available on 104 machines (84.5%). Fourteen of the 383 vaporizers tested for calibration did not meet the calibration standard recommended by the manufacturers. None of the 32 liquid anesthetic samples collected and analyzed during the survey showed contaminants. Only four (8.8%) hospitals utilized a written anesthesia machine checklist. There was no correlation between the number of malfunctions observed and ages of the machines, although the older machines tended to lack the basic monitoring devices and safety features.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3382037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Who's to blame?

Authors:  P G Duncan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  The upgrading and replacement of anaesthetic equipment: a provincial approach.

Authors:  R M Friesen; G Hatton; J Bjornson
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Surveying anaesthesia.

Authors:  C Walker
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Performance of anesthesia machines' devices that are not part of the Food and Drug Administration's daily checkout.

Authors:  F Dexter; S Coffin; J Woodward
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1997-05

5.  Oxygen analyzers: failure rates and life spans of galvanic cells.

Authors:  R M Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1990-07

6.  The anesthesia machine valve tester: a new device and method for evaluating the competence of unidirectional anesthetic valves.

Authors:  S Eappen; S B Corn
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1996-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.