Literature DB >> 3381957

The estimated predictive value of screening for illicit drugs in the workplace.

V E Wells1, W Halperin, M Thun.   

Abstract

This paper estimates the predictive values of screening tests for six illicit drugs of common concern in the workplace (amphetamines, barbiturates, cocaine, hallucinogens, marijuana, and opiates) using published information on test sensitivity and specificity and survey data on prevalence. Estimated predictive values (negative) were generally high, whereas the estimated predictive value of a positive test ranged from 1 per cent for amphetamines to 100 per cent for hallucinogens and was only 38 per cent for marijuana, the most prevalent drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3381957      PMCID: PMC1350340          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.7.817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of laboratory performance with blind and mail-distributed proficiency testing samples.

Authors:  L C LaMotte; G O Guerrant; D S Lewis; C T Hall
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Crisis in drug testing. Results of CDC blind study.

Authors:  H J Hansen; S P Caudill; D J Boone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-04-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Drugs in the workplace: from the batter's box to the boardroom.

Authors:  S H Bompey
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-09

4.  Narcotics detection and industry.

Authors:  D Sohn; J Simon
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1970-01

5.  Confirmation of a tetrahydrocannabinol metabolite in urine by gas chromatography.

Authors:  J D Whiting; W W Manders
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.367

6.  Urine screening for drugs by EMIT.

Authors:  S M Fletcher
Journal:  J Forensic Sci Soc       Date:  1981-10

7.  Detection and confirmation of urinary cannabinoids.

Authors:  C A Sutheimer; R Yarborough; B R Hepler; I Sunshine
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.367

8.  Controversy in the detection of disease.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W W Holland
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-08-23       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Basic issues in population screening for cancer.

Authors:  P Cole; A S Morrison
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Evaluation of immunoassays for cannabinoids in urine.

Authors:  J Irving; B Leeb; R L Foltz; C E Cook; J T Bursey; R E Willette
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.367

View more
  3 in total

1.  A survey of state regulation of testing for drugs of abuse outside of licensed (accredited) clinical laboratories.

Authors:  D M Baer; R E Belsey; M R Skeels
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Job performance and prescription vs. non-prescription drugs.

Authors:  R Lewy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Children taking risks: the association with cocaine and other drug use by young adulthood.

Authors:  Carlos F Ríos-Bedoya; Holly C Wilcox; Marina Piazza; James C Anthony
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.913

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.