Literature DB >> 2984441

Crisis in drug testing. Results of CDC blind study.

H J Hansen, S P Caudill, D J Boone.   

Abstract

In response to questions about the reliability of the results of screening urine for drugs, we evaluated the performance of 13 laboratories, which serve a total of 262 methadone treatment facilities, by submitting prereferenced samples through the treatment facilities as patient samples (blind testing). Error rates for the 13 laboratories on samples containing barbiturates, amphetamines, methadone, cocaine, codeine, and morphine ranged from 11% to 94%, 19% to 100%, 0% to 33%, 0% to 100%, 0% to 100%, and 5% to 100%, respectively. Similarly, error rates on samples not containing these drugs (false-positives) ranged from 0% to 6%, 0% to 37%, 0% to 66%, 0% to 6%, 0% to 7%, and 0% to 10%, respectively. These blind tests indicate that greater care is taken with known evaluation samples than with routine samples, laboratories are often unable to detect drugs at concentrations called for by their contracts, and the observed underreporting of drugs may threaten the treatment process. Drug treatment facilities should monitor the performance of their contract laboratories with quality-control samples, preferably through blind testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2984441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of mycology laboratory proficiency testing.

Authors:  A A Reilly; I F Salkin; M R McGinnis; S Gromadzki; L Pasarell; M Kemna; N Higgins; M Salfinger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Emergency management of the acutely poisoned child/adolescent.

Authors:  D L McCarty; J S Surpure
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Covariance analysis of laboratory variance in steady-state serum phenytoin concentrations.

Authors:  H Costeff; Z Groswasser; N Soroker; G van Belle
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Occupational Medicine: Employee Drug and Alcohol Abuse-Industry's Approach.

Authors:  P P Greaney
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-10

Review 5.  The role of physicians as medical review officers in workplace drug testing programs. In pursuit of the last nanogram.

Authors:  H W Clark
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-05

6.  The estimated predictive value of screening for illicit drugs in the workplace.

Authors:  V E Wells; W Halperin; M Thun
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Role of the toxicology laboratory in the treatment of acute poisoning.

Authors:  B R Hepler; C A Sutheimer; I Sunshine
Journal:  Med Toxicol       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb

8.  A combined HPLC-immunoenzymatic comprehensive screening for suspected drug poisoning in the emergency department.

Authors:  A Fabbri; S Ruggeri; G Marchesini; A Vandelli
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 9.  The influence of substance use on adolescent brain development.

Authors:  L M Squeglia; J Jacobus; S F Tapert
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.843

10.  Clinical evaluation and use of urine screening for drug abuse.

Authors:  A J Saxon; D A Calsyn; V M Haver; C J Delaney
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.