Literature DB >> 33819289

Safety and glycemic outcomes of do-it-yourself AndroidAPS hybrid closed-loop system in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Andrzej Gawrecki1, Dorota Zozulinska-Ziolkiewicz1, Magdalena A Michalak2, Anna Adamska1, Michal Michalak3, Urszula Frackowiak2, Justyna Flotynska1, Monika Pietrzak2, Szymon Czapla4, Bernhard Gehr5, Aleksandra Araszkiewicz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and glycemic outcomes with the use of a Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Hybrid Closed-Loop (HCL) system based on the AndroidAPS application in type 1 diabetes (T1D).
METHODS: Single-center clinical trial, with 3-week run-in and 12-week study period. DIY HCL system consisted of the Dana Diabecare RS insulin pump, Dexcom G5 continuous glucose monitoring system and AndroidAPS application. Primary outcome was safety: incidences of severe hypoglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, time spent in glycemia <54 mg/dl. Secondary endpoints included percentage of time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dl, time below 70 mg/dl, HbA1c, insulin requirements, and body weight.
RESULTS: In total 12 subjects (5 men, 7 women) were enrolled, mean age 31.3±6.7, 95%CI(27.7-34.9) years, mean diabetes duration 16.1±5.7, 95%CI(13.0-19.2) years. No episodes of severe hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis were observed. Percentage of time spent in glycemia below 54mg/dl was not increased. Average sensor glycemia was lower in the study period than baseline (141.1 ± 8.4, 95%CI(136.3-145.9) vs. 153.3 ± 17.9, 95%CI(143.2-163.4), mg/dl p<0.001). TIR 70-180 mg/dl was improved by 11.3%, 95%CI(2.8%-19.8%) (from 68.0 ± 12.7 to 79.3 ± 6.4%, p<0.001), without increasing hypoglycemia time. The HbA1c level decreased by -0.5%, 95%CI(-0.9%--0.1%) (from 6.8 ± 0.5 to 6.3 ± 0.4%, p<0.001). Additionally, in the last 4 weeks of the study period participants significantly improved and showed TIR 70-180 mg/dl 82.1 ± 5.6%, 95%CI(78.9-85.3), time <54 mg/dl 0.30 (0.20-0.55)%, median 95%CI(0.1-0.7) and <70 mg/dl 1.90 (1.10-3.05)%, median 95%CI(0.7-3.2). The insulin requirement and body weight did not change in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed safety of the Do-It-Yourself HCL system AndroidAPS in adults with T1D, limited to well-controlled, highly selected and closely monitored patients. The use of AndroidAPS significantly improved HbA1c, time in range and average sensor glycemia without increasing hypoglycemia. As both patients and their medical team are gaining experience using the system over time, they improve glycemic control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: no. DRKS00015439; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00015439.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33819289     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  7 in total

Review 1.  Open-source automated insulin delivery: international consensus statement and practical guidance for health-care professionals.

Authors:  Katarina Braune; Rayhan A Lal; Lenka Petruželková; Gary Scheiner; Per Winterdijk; Signe Schmidt; Linda Raimond; Korey K Hood; Michael C Riddell; Timothy C Skinner; Klemens Raile; Sufyan Hussain
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 32.069

2.  Large-Scale Data Analysis for Glucose Variability Outcomes with Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Arsalan Shahid; Dana M Lewis
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Emotional and Physical Health Impact in Children and Adolescents and Their Caregivers Using Open-source Automated Insulin Delivery: Qualitative Analysis of Lived Experiences.

Authors:  Katarina Braune; Niklas Krug; Christine Knoll; Hanne Ballhausen; Axel Thieffry; Yanbing Chen; Shane O'Donnell; Klemens Raile; Bryan Cleal
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 7.076

Review 4.  A scoping review of Do-It-Yourself Automated Insulin Delivery system (DIY AID) use in people with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Amy E Morrison; Kimberley Chong; Peter A Senior; Anna Lam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Practical Guidance on Open Source and Commercial Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals Supporting People with Insulin-Requiring Diabetes.

Authors:  Dana M Lewis; Sufyan Hussain
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.595

Review 6.  [Individualization of diabetes treatment by automated insulin delivery].

Authors:  T Biester; K Dovc; A Chobot; M Tauschmann; T Kapellen
Journal:  Monatsschr Kinderheilkd       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 0.416

7.  Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: Today, Tomorrow and User Requirements.

Authors:  Marga Giménez; Ignacio Conget; Nick Oliver
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.