| Literature DB >> 33817267 |
Abstract
In this paper, konjac oligoglucomannan (KOGM) was obtained with a hydrolysis rate of 56.24% by controlling the hydrolysis conditions. KOGM was passed through a 0.2 kDa dialysis bag, a 3 kDa ultrafiltration tube, and a 5 kDa ultrafiltration tube, creating samples with molecular weights of 0.2-3 kDa (IV), 3-5 kDa (III), and >5 kDa (II), respectively. The in vitro antioxidant activities of the KOGM samples were tested by measuring their removal effects on ˙OH, O 2 - , and DPPH˙. The in vivo antioxidant activities of the samples were analyzed by measuring their impacts on the malondialdehyde (MDA) content, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX) activity in mice. The results show that the KOGM samples in groups III and IV could effectively remove ˙OH, O 2 - , and DPPH˙; the KOGM samples in all three groups could enhance the SOD and GSH-PX activities and reduce the MDA content in the liver tissues of mice; finally, the antioxidant activity of KOGM is negatively correlated with the molecular weight.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; konjac oligoglucomannan (KOGM); molecular weight; orthogonal test
Year: 2020 PMID: 33817267 PMCID: PMC7747514 DOI: 10.1515/biol-2020-0076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Life Sci ISSN: 2391-5412 Impact factor: 0.938
Factors and levels of the orthogonal test
| Parameter | Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| (A) Time (h) | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| (B) Temperature (°C) | 45 | 50 | 55 |
| (C) pH | 4.5 | 5 | 5.5 |
| (D) Enzyme dosage (U/g) | 50 | 90 | 130 |
Figure 1Effect of time on KGM hydrolysis rate.
Figure 2Effect of temperature on KGM hydrolysis rate.
Figure 3Effect of pH on KGM hydrolysis rate.
Figure 4Effect of enzyme dosage on KGM hydrolysis rate.
Results of the orthogonal test
| Experimental no | (A) Time (h) | (B) Temperature (°C) | (C) pH | (D) Enzyme dosage (U/g) | Hydrolysis rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 45 | 4.5 | 50 | 45.87 |
| 2 | 1 | 50 | 5 | 90 | 53.45 |
| 3 | 1 | 55 | 5.5 | 130 | 49.36 |
| 4 | 2 | 45 | 5 | 130 | 56.48 |
| 5 | 2 | 50 | 5.5 | 50 | 49.71 |
| 6 | 2 | 55 | 4.5 | 90 | 42.87 |
| 7 | 3 | 45 | 5.5 | 90 | 39.16 |
| 8 | 3 | 50 | 4.5 | 130 | 43.09 |
| 9 | 3 | 55 | 5 | 50 | 31.02 |
| K1 | 148.68 | 141.51 | 131.83 | 126.60 | |
| K2 | 149.06 | 146.25 | 140.95 | 135.48 | |
| K3 | 113.27 | 123.25 | 138.23 | 148.93 | |
| R | 11.93 | 7.67 | 3.04 | 7.44 |
Measured M n values of the samples
| Sample |
|
|---|---|
| KGM | 64,530 |
| KOGM I | 1,328 |
| KOGM II | 1,352 |
| KOGM III | 1,176 |
| KOGM IV | 773 |
Figure 5˙OH removal effects of the KOGMs with different molecular weights and Vc.
Figure 6DPPH˙ removal effects of the KOGMs with different molecular weights and Vc.
Figure 7removal effects of the KOGMs with different molecular weights and Vc.
Influence of molecular weight of KOGM on the MDA, SOD, and GSH-PX levels in the liver tissues of mice
| Groups | MDA (nmol mg prot−1) | SOD (U mg prot−1) | GSH-PX (U mg prot−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal group (A) | 21.45 ± 2.61 | 53.67 ± 12.89 | 152.45 ± 14.67 |
| KOGM II group (B1) | 20.82 ± 3.13 | 51.98 ± 11.17 | 238.98 ± 25.49* |
| KOGM III group (B2) | 19.13 ± 2.87 | 66.59 ± 12.49* | 256.32 ± 18.02* |
| KOGM IV group (B3) | 18.26 ± 3.39* | 70.98 ± 12.56** | 349.22 ± 35.08** |
| Positive control group (C) | 16.59 ± 3.11** | 58.16 ± 14.51* | 336.96 ± 25.56** |
Note: * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 compared to the normal group.