| Literature DB >> 33817106 |
Xia Qiu1, Wenwen Zhong2.
Abstract
This study investigated the antihyperglycemic and antihyperlipidemic effects of low-molecular-weight carrageenan (LC) on rats fed a high-fat diet. Wistar rats were divided into five groups: normal control group (NC), high-fat diet control group (HC), carrageenan-treated control group (CC), 1% LC group (1% LC), and 3% LC-groups (3% LC). Body weight, food intake, fecal weight, blood glucose, and serum lipid levels were measured. After 30 days, body weight significantly decreased in the LC-treated groups than in the HC group. Moreover, in the LC-treated groups, postprandial blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels decreased, whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels increased. From this study, our data suggest that LC has antihyperglycemic and hypolipidemic effects when compared to carrageenan, likely related to its increased absorption due to its lower molecular weight.Entities:
Keywords: Carrageenan; antihyperglycemic; hypolipidemic
Year: 2018 PMID: 33817106 PMCID: PMC7874689 DOI: 10.1515/biol-2018-0046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Life Sci ISSN: 2391-5412 Impact factor: 0.938
Figure 1Effects of LC on changes of body weight in rats over 30 days. Body weight and food intake of 50 rats from five groups were measured daily. The five groups were: normal control group (NC) fed an ordinary diet; the high-fat group (HC) fed a high-fat diet; the treated control group (CC) fed 1 g carrageenan per 100 g high-fat diet; and the low- and high-dose study groups (1% LC and 3% LC) fed 1 and 3 g LC per 100 g high-fat diet, respectively. Mean± standard deviation (vertical lines). a: compared with HC, P<0.05; b: compared with CC, P<0.05; and c: compared with 1% LC, P<0.05.
Effects of LC on the rate of food utilization in rats ( x̄ ±SD)
| Group | Food intake (kcal) | Body weight gain (g) | Food availability (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 780.98±29.97[ | 97.62±8.91[ | 47.50±2.12[ |
| HC | 1737.84±35.16 | 167.72±7.96 | 50.38±3.07 |
| CC | 1631.82±38.12[ | 145.09±12.50[ | 46.41±2.66[ |
| 1% LC | 1580.36±40.23[ | 137.35±10.11[ | 45.37±2.24[ |
| 3% LC | 1475.43±32.14[ | 116.37±7.75[ | 41.17±3.01[ |
compared with HC, P<0.05
compared with CC, P<0.05
compared with 1% LC, P<0.05
Effects of LC on fecal moisture capacity in rats ( x̄±SD)
| Group | Fecal wet weight (g/d) | Fecal dry weight (g/d) | Fecal moisture capacity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 6.82±1.29[ | 5.14±1.49[ | 24.63±9.82[ |
| HC | 7.71±0.97 | 6.41±0.84 | 16.86±7.24 |
| CC | 7.47±1.53 | 5.48±0.75 | 25.30±8.49[ |
| 1% LC | 7.42±1.67 | 5.32±1.01[ | 28.30±7.16[ |
| 3% LC | 7.12±1.04 | 4.58±0.77[ | 35.67±5.33[ |
compared with HC, P<0.05
compared with CC, P<0.05
compared with 1% LC, P<0.05
Effects of LC on blood glucose in rats ( x̄±SD, mmol/L)
| Group | Initial | Final | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBG | PBG | FBG | PBG | ||
| NC | 4.91±0.86 | 6.82±1.29 | 4.83±1.05 | 6.00±0.43[ | |
| HC | 5.02±1.05 | 7.11±0.97 | 4.97±1.31 | 7.04±0.68 | |
| CC | 4.79±0.92 | 7.42±0.67 | 4.89±1.16 | 6.44±0.43[ | |
| 1% LC | 4.86±1.02 | 7.27±1.03 | 5.04±1.22 | 6.19±0.70[ | |
| 3% LC | 4.71±0.95 | 7.12±1.04 | 5.11±1.09 | 5.52±0.64[ | |
compared with HC, P<0.05
compared with CC, P<0.05
compared with 1% LC, P<0.05
Effects of LC on lipid levels in rats ( x̄ ±SD)
| Group | TG (mmol/L) | TC (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 1.82±0.55[ | 1.28±0.16[ | 28.26±2.89[ | 47.03±3.43[ |
| HC | 3.51±0.69 | 1.93±0.29 | 47.50±2.97 | 28.18±3.79 |
| CC | 2.77±0.51[ | 1.61±0.22[ | 39.89±4.14[ | 30.24±5.42 |
| 1% LC | 2.62±0.55[ | 1.57±0.35[ | 38.03±4.79[ | 32.30±5.04[ |
| 3% LC | 2.09±0.32[ | 1.11±0.33[ | 34.80±3.90[ | 34.08±4.31[ |
compared with HC, P<0.05
compared with CC, P<0.05
compared with 1% LC, P<0.05