| Literature DB >> 33817097 |
Jingjing Chen1, Hui Hua2, Jing Pang1, Xianglong Shi1, Weiqun Bi1, Yingduan Li1, Wenjian Xu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To analyze the application value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and exponent apparent diffusion coefficient (EADC) in evaluating the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapy in cervical cancer using pre- and posttreatment diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) scans.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical Cancer; Chemotherapy; Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI); Radiation
Year: 2018 PMID: 33817097 PMCID: PMC7874687 DOI: 10.1515/biol-2018-0037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Life Sci ISSN: 2391-5412 Impact factor: 0.938
ADC value and EADC value in different stages of treatment
| Stages | CR Group | PR Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADC value (×10-3mm2/s) | EADC value | ADC value (×10-3mm2/s) | EADC value | |
| Pretreatment | 0.764±0.073 | 0.546±0.033 | 0.986±0.049 | 0.457±0.018 |
| 15 days after treatment | 1.703±0.044 | 0.258±0.009 | 1.577±0.047 | 0.289±0.012 |
| One month after treatment | 1.730±0.024 | 0.251±0.005 | 1.674±0.025 | 0.261±0.005 |
| Two month after treatment | 1.799±0.035 | 0.237±0.007 | 1.752±0.009 | 0.246±0.002 |
VS before treatment
p<0.01
p<0.05
ROC curve analysis of ADC
| Parameter | AUC | Standard error | P value | 95% confidence intervals | Threshold (×10-3mm2/s) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADC | 0.902 | 0.046 | 0.000 | 0.812~0.991 | 0.891 | 84.4 | 95.0 |
ADC value, EADC value and the maximum tumor diameter
| Stages | ADC value (×10-3mm2/s) | EADC value | Maximum tumor diameter (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment | 0.944±0.046 | 0.474±0.017 | 47.21±3.83 |
| 15 days after treatment | 1.601±0.040 | 0.283±0.010 | 46.86±3.77 |
| One month after treatment | 1.685±0.097 | 0.259±0.004 | 21.57±1.50 |
| Two month after treatment | 1.761±0.047 | 0.244±0.002 | 6.48±1.09 |
VS before treatment p<0.01