Xi Chen1, Shengnan Zhao1, Hongxi Wang2, Chunxi Fu1, Rong Tian2, Liqun Zou1. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of interim positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for nasal-type extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is controversial. We evaluated the prognostic value of interim PET/CT in ENKTL patients to facilitate risk stratification and guide clinical treatment. METHODS: Patients with ENKTL who received first-line chemotherapy based on L-asparaginase/pegaspargase with/without involved-field radiotherapy were recruited for this study. Pretreatment and interim PET/CT evaluations were performed. Interim PET/CT was evaluated via the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and the Deauville 5-point scale (DS); and the capacity to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal SUVmax cutoff. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze relationships between interim PET/CT results and clinical characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the independent effects of interim PET/CT. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to assess the prognostic value of interim PET/CT at different timepoints. RESULTS: Overall, 129 ENKTL patients were enrolled. The optimal interim PET/CT SUVmax cut-off was 4.95. The median follow-up was 34 [2-90] months, in the low SUVmax group (≤4.95), the 2-year PFS and OS rates were 76.3% and 88.0%, respectively; in the high SUVmax group (>4.95), the PFS and OS rates were 15.6% and 44.5%, respectively. Likewise, for the DS 1-3 group, the PFS and OS rates were 78.9% and 91.2%, respectively; and in the DS 4 or 5 group, the rates of PFS and OS were 49.7% and 69.0%, respectively. In univariate analysis, interim PET/CT evaluation based on SUVmax and DS scores were both PFS and OS predictors. In multivariate analysis, SUVmax was independently significantly associated with PFS (P<0.001) and OS (P=0.002), and DS was independently significantly associated with PFS (P=0.004) but not OS (P=0.204). In the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel testing, the SUVmax and DS were significantly associated with PFS and OS after adjustments for the interim PET/CT timing. CONCLUSIONS: Interim PET/CT was of prognostic value concerning ENKTL. The SUVmax is an independent prognostic indicator of PFS and OS, while the DS is an independent prognostic indicator of PFS but not OS. The SUVmax is of greater prognostic value than DS. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of interim positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for nasal-type extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is controversial. We evaluated the prognostic value of interim PET/CT in ENKTL patients to facilitate risk stratification and guide clinical treatment. METHODS: Patients with ENKTL who received first-line chemotherapy based on L-asparaginase/pegaspargase with/without involved-field radiotherapy were recruited for this study. Pretreatment and interim PET/CT evaluations were performed. Interim PET/CT was evaluated via the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and the Deauville 5-point scale (DS); and the capacity to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal SUVmax cutoff. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze relationships between interim PET/CT results and clinical characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the independent effects of interim PET/CT. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to assess the prognostic value of interim PET/CT at different timepoints. RESULTS: Overall, 129 ENKTL patients were enrolled. The optimal interim PET/CT SUVmax cut-off was 4.95. The median follow-up was 34 [2-90] months, in the low SUVmax group (≤4.95), the 2-year PFS and OS rates were 76.3% and 88.0%, respectively; in the high SUVmax group (>4.95), the PFS and OS rates were 15.6% and 44.5%, respectively. Likewise, for the DS 1-3 group, the PFS and OS rates were 78.9% and 91.2%, respectively; and in the DS 4 or 5 group, the rates of PFS and OS were 49.7% and 69.0%, respectively. In univariate analysis, interim PET/CT evaluation based on SUVmax and DS scores were both PFS and OS predictors. In multivariate analysis, SUVmax was independently significantly associated with PFS (P<0.001) and OS (P=0.002), and DS was independently significantly associated with PFS (P=0.004) but not OS (P=0.204). In the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel testing, the SUVmax and DS were significantly associated with PFS and OS after adjustments for the interim PET/CT timing. CONCLUSIONS: Interim PET/CT was of prognostic value concerning ENKTL. The SUVmax is an independent prognostic indicator of PFS and OS, while the DS is an independent prognostic indicator of PFS but not OS. The SUVmax is of greater prognostic value than DS. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deauville 5-point scale (DS); interim positron emission tomography/computed tomography (interim PET/CT); maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax); nasal-type extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL); prognostic value
Authors: Juliano J Cerci; Luís F Pracchia; Camila C G Linardi; Felipe A Pitella; Dominique Delbeke; Marisa Izaki; Evelinda Trindade; José Soares; Valeria Buccheri; José C Meneghetti Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Bruce D Cheson; Richard I Fisher; Sally F Barrington; Franco Cavalli; Lawrence H Schwartz; Emanuele Zucca; T Andrew Lister Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Steven H Swerdlow; Elias Campo; Stefano A Pileri; Nancy Lee Harris; Harald Stein; Reiner Siebert; Ranjana Advani; Michele Ghielmini; Gilles A Salles; Andrew D Zelenetz; Elaine S Jaffe Journal: Blood Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: P Raanani; Y Shasha; C Perry; U Metser; E Naparstek; S Apter; A Nagler; A Polliack; I Ben-Bassat; E Even-Sapir Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-09-28 Impact factor: 32.976