Monica Luciana1. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 55455 USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review examines the role of executive control processes in the liability for substance misuse and whether substance use, once initiated, leads to subsequent decrements as proposed by neurotoxicity models of substance use disorder (SUD). RECENT FINDINGS: As indicated by a number of recent meta-analyses, executive control processes, which include working memory, cognitive flexibility and numerous aspects of attentional, behavioral and emotional control, are impaired in the context of active SUD. Longitudinal studies of behaviorally disinhibited children, individuals with familial risks for SUD, and twins within whom genetic versus environmental influences on behavior can be modeled robustly indicate that relatively poor control is a vulnerability factor for early substance use initiation, binge patterns of use, and subsequent SUD. Evidence of further declines in executive control, once substance use is initiated, is mixed, although a growing number of neuroimaging studies indicate that frontostriatal, frontolimbic, and frontocerebellar systems are altered as a consequence of use. SUMMARY: Together these patterns suggest strategies for identifying children and adolescents at high risk for SUD, avenues through which substance-related neurotoxicities can be more reliably detected, and the need to structure prevention efforts in a manner that is developmentally appropriate and perhaps personalized to individual vulnerabilities.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review examines the role of executive control processes in the liability for substance misuse and whether substance use, once initiated, leads to subsequent decrements as proposed by neurotoxicity models of substance use disorder (SUD). RECENT FINDINGS: As indicated by a number of recent meta-analyses, executive control processes, which include working memory, cognitive flexibility and numerous aspects of attentional, behavioral and emotional control, are impaired in the context of active SUD. Longitudinal studies of behaviorally disinhibited children, individuals with familial risks for SUD, and twins within whom genetic versus environmental influences on behavior can be modeled robustly indicate that relatively poor control is a vulnerability factor for early substance use initiation, binge patterns of use, and subsequent SUD. Evidence of further declines in executive control, once substance use is initiated, is mixed, although a growing number of neuroimaging studies indicate that frontostriatal, frontolimbic, and frontocerebellar systems are altered as a consequence of use. SUMMARY: Together these patterns suggest strategies for identifying children and adolescents at high risk for SUD, avenues through which substance-related neurotoxicities can be more reliably detected, and the need to structure prevention efforts in a manner that is developmentally appropriate and perhaps personalized to individual vulnerabilities.
Authors: Laura Dwyer-Lindgren; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Rebecca W Stubbs; Chloe Morozoff; Shreya Shirude; Jürgen Unützer; Mohsen Naghavi; Ali H Mokdad; Christopher J L Murray Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kenneth S Kendler; Kristina Sundquist; Henrik Ohlsson; Karolina Palmér; Hermine Maes; Marilyn A Winkleby; Jan Sundquist Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2012-07
Authors: Elise E DeVito; Shashwath A Meda; Rachel Jiantonio; Marc N Potenza; John H Krystal; Godfrey D Pearlson Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Richard F Farmer; Jeff M Gau; John R Seeley; Derek B Kosty; Kenneth J Sher; Peter M Lewinsohn Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-04-23 Impact factor: 4.492