| Literature DB >> 33814743 |
Pawan Agarwal1, Dhananjaya Sharma2, Vikesh Agrawal3, Swati Tiwari2, Rajeev Kukrele1.
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of a modified technique of double rectangle pattern for correction of severe ptosis. Methods This is a retrospective study over a period of 8 years including patients who underwent correction of ptosis by double rectangle using autologous fascia lata sling. Surgical outcomes were assessed postoperatively by distance from the corneal light reflex to the upper eyelid margin (MRD1) and levator function. Results Twenty-six eyelids were operated in 20 patients. There were 9 males and 11 females, with age ranging from 4 to 35 years. Preoperatively, all patients had poor MRD1 and poor levator function. Postoperative MRD1 was good in 13 patients (17 eyelids), fair in 5 (7eyelids), and poor in 2 patients (2 eyelids). Postoperative levator function was excellent in 12 patients (15 eyelids), good in 6 (9 eyelids), and fair in 2 patients (2 eyelids). At a mean follow-up of 12 months, adequate correction was achieved in 24 eyelids, and 2 eyelids had undercorrection. Conclusion Frontalis sling with a double rectangle is simple and more efficient, as it provides a straight line of pull to the eyelid for correction of severe ptosis. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Entities:
Keywords: double rectangle pattern; fascia lata; frontalis sling; ptosis; surgical correction
Year: 2021 PMID: 33814743 PMCID: PMC8012781 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Plast Surg ISSN: 0970-0358
Fig. 1Double rectangle (open superiorly) pattern of autologous fascia lata frontalis sling.
Fig. 2Per-operative picture of ptosis correction with double rectangle fascia lata frontalis sling.
Fig. 3Pre- and postoperative picture of right sided congenital ptosis correction with double rectangle fascia lata frontalis sling.
Fig. 6Six months follow-up of bilateral acquired ptosis.
Demographic details of patients and outcome of surgery
| S no | Age | Sex | Site | Diagnosis | Pre op | Postop | Postop levator function | Complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | F | Left eye | Ptosis | Poor | Good | Excellent | |
| 2 | 27 | M | Bilateral | Ptosis | Poor | Good | Excellent | |
| 3 | 5 | M | Left eye | Congenital Ptosis | Poor | Good | Excellent | |
| 4 | 19 | F | Bilateral | Ptosis | Poor | Good | Excellent | |
| 5 | 28 | M | Left eye | Ptosis | Poor | Poor | Fair | Undercorrection |
| 6 | 9 | F | Bilateral | Congenital ptosis | Poor | Fair | Good | |
| 7 | 5 | M | Left eye | Congenital Ptosis | Poor | Good | Excellent | |
| 8 | 14 | F | Right eye | Ptosis | Poor | Good | Excellent | |
| 9 | 25 | M | Left eye | Ptosis | Poor | Fair | Excellent | |
| 10 | 25 | M | Left eye | Ptosis | Poor | Good | Excellent | |
| 11 | 7 | F | Bilateral | Congenital ptosis | Poor | Good | Good | |
| 12 | 20 | M | Right eye | Ptosis | Poor | Fair | Fair | |
| 13 | 10 | F | Bilateral | Ptosis | Poor | Good | Excellent | |
| 14 | 4 | F | Left eye | Congenital Ptosis | Poor | Good | Good | |
| 15 | 9 | M | Right eye | Ptosis | Poor | Fair | Good | |
| 16 | 6 | F | Right eye | Congenital Ptosis | Poor | Poor | Fair | Under correction |
| 17 | 20 | F | Right eye | Ptosis | Poor | Good | Excellent | |
| 18 | 30 | F | Left eye | Ptosis | Poor | Good | Excellent | |
| 19 | 30 | F | Bilateral | Congenital Ptosis | Poor | Fair | Good | |
| 20 | 35 | M | Left eye | Ptosis | Poor | Good | Excellent |
Ptosis recurrence after frontalis suspension with different material
| S no | Authors | No. of eyelids | Material used | Pattern used for sling | Follow-up duration | Recurrence rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crawford 1 | 316 | Autogenous fascia lata irradiated fascia lata | Double triangle | NA | 5% |
| 2 | Spoor 7 | 18 | Irradiated fascia lata | Double rectangle | 4–24 | No recurrence reported |
| 3 | Mehta 12 | 32 | Polyester | Modified Fox pentagon | 29 | 23–25% |
| 4 | Esmaeli 15 | 132 | Banked fascia | Crawford's double triangle | 128 | 28% |
| 5 | Liu 16 | 112 | Nylon | Not specified | 84 | 100% |
| 6 | Ben Simon 17 | 164 | Autogenous fascia lata | Double pentagon | 20 | 22% |
| 7 | Wasserman 21 | 102 | Banked fascia lata | Single pentagon | 24 | 51.4% |
| 8 | Yoon 24 | 324 | Autogenous fascia lata | Single rectangle | 18 | 15.5% |
| 9 | Bajaj 25 | 60 | Ethibond | Crawford's double triangle | 16 | 17% |
| 10 | Carter 26 | 61 | Silicon | Fox pentagon | 22 | 7% |
| 11 | Wilson 27 | 112 | Banked fascia lata | Two rhomboids | 86 | 43% |
| 12 | Wagner 28 | 145 | Autogenous fascia | Single/double rhomboid | NA | 8.3% |
| 13 | Lee 29 | 181 | Preserved fascia lata | Pentagonal configuration | 36 | 63.2% |
| 14 | Kim 30 | 76 | Banked fascia | Single rectangle | 106 | No recurrence reported |
| 15 | Current study | 26 | Autogenous fascia lata | Double rectangle | 12 | No recurrence |