Literature DB >> 24411372

Microstructure and mechanical properties of synthetic brow-suspension materials.

Kyung-Ah Kwon1, Rebecca J Shipley1, Mohan Edirisinghe2, Daniel George Ezra3, Geoffrey E Rose3, Andrew W Rayment4, Serena M Best4, Ruth E Cameron4.   

Abstract

Levator palpebrae superioris (LPS) is a muscle responsible for lifting the upper eyelid and its malfunction leads to a condition called "ptosis", resulting in disfigurement and visual impairment. Severe ptosis is generally treated with "brow-suspension" surgery, whereby the eyelid is cross-connected to the mobile tissues above the eyebrow using a cord-like material, either natural (e.g. fascia lata harvested from the patient) or a synthetic cord. Synthetic brow-suspension materials are widely used, due to not requiring the harvesting of fascia lata that can be associated with pain and donor-site complications. The mechanical properties of some commonly-used synthetic brow-suspension materials were investigated--namely, monofilament polypropylene (Prolene®), sheathed braided polyamide (Supramid Extra® II), silicone frontalis suspension rod (Visitec® Seiff frontalis suspension set), woven polyester (Mersilene® mesh), and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Ptose-Up). Each material underwent a single tensile loading to the failure of the material, at three different displacement rates (1, 750 and 1500 mm/min). All the materials exhibited elastic-plastic tensile stress-strain behaviour with considerable differences in elastic modulus, ultimate tensile strength, elastic limit and work of fracture. The results suggest that, as compared to other materials, the silicone brow-suspension rod (Visitec® SFSS) might be the most suitable, providing relatively long-lasting stability and desirable performance. These findings, together with other factors such as commercial availability, cost and clinical outcomes, will provide clinicians with a more rational basis for selection of brow-suspension materials.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brow-suspension; Materials; Mechanical properties; Microstructure; Ptosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24411372     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  5 in total

1.  A Multicenter Noncomparative Clinical Study on Midface Rejuvenation Using a Nonabsorbable Polypropylene Mesh: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Chang Sik Pak; Lan Sook Chang; Hobin Lee; Jae Hoon Jeong; Jinwook Jeong; Eul-Sik Yoon; Chan Yeong Heo
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Analysis of the causes of recurrence after frontalis suspension using silicone rods for congenital ptosis.

Authors:  Chang Yeom Kim; Byeong Jae Son; Jangyup Son; Jongill Hong; Sang Yeul Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Experimental Investigation on the Tissue Response Induced by Face-Lifting Mesh Suspension Thread in Rats.

Authors:  Jung Eun Kim; Yo Han Kim; A Young Park; Ho Jung Lee; Jong Hun Lee
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 1.444

4.  Double Rectangle Fascia Lata Frontalis Sling: A Rationale Approach for Ptosis.

Authors:  Pawan Agarwal; Dhananjaya Sharma; Vikesh Agrawal; Swati Tiwari; Rajeev Kukrele
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-03-02

5.  The Combined Use of Silicone and Green Braided Polyester ‎Suture (Ethibond) versus ‎Silicone or Ethibond Alone for Frontalis ‎Suspension Surgery in Children.

Authors:  Hala K Mattout; Sameh M Fouda; Sahar Hemeda
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.