| Literature DB >> 33813604 |
Bonny Michael Oloka1,2, Guilherme da Silva Pereira3, Victor A Amankwaah1,4, Marcelo Mollinari1, Kenneth V Pecota1, Benard Yada2, Bode A Olukolu5, Zhao-Bang Zeng1, G Craig Yencho6.
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE: Utilizing a high-density integrated genetic linkage map of hexaploid sweetpotato, we discovered a major dominant QTL for root-knot nematode (RKN) resistance and modeled its effects. This discovery is useful for development of a modern sweetpotato breeding program that utilizes marker-assisted selection and genomic selection approaches for faster genetic gain of RKN resistance. The root-knot nematode [Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood] (RKN) causes significant storage root quality reduction and yields losses in cultivated sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.]. In this study, resistance to RKN was examined in a mapping population consisting of 244 progenies derived from a cross (TB) between 'Tanzania,' a predominant African landrace cultivar with resistance to RKN, and 'Beauregard,' an RKN susceptible major cultivar in the USA. We performed quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis using a random-effect QTL mapping model on the TB genetic map. An RKN bioassay incorporating potted cuttings of each genotype was conducted in the greenhouse and replicated five times over a period of 10 weeks. For each replication, each genotype was inoculated with ca. 20,000 RKN eggs, and root-knot galls were counted ~62 days after inoculation. Resistance to RKN in the progeny was highly skewed toward the resistant parent, exhibiting medium to high levels of resistance. We identified one major QTL on linkage group 7, dominant in nature, which explained 58.3% of the phenotypic variation in RKN counts. This work represents a significant step forward in our understanding of the genetic architecture of RKN resistance and sets the stage for future utilization of genomics-assisted breeding in sweetpotato breeding programs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33813604 PMCID: PMC8263542 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-021-03797-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theor Appl Genet ISSN: 0040-5752 Impact factor: 5.574
Fig.1Histogram and boxplot of the adjusted means of root-knot counts in the TB population. Most of the progeny (75%) reacted like ‘Tanzania’ (< 15 root-knot counts), the resistant parent, while < 1% were more susceptible than ‘Beauregard.’ The boxplot above the histogram shows the statistics of the distribution
Fig. 2QTL profile for root-knot count adjusted mean in the TB population. A single major QTL was identified on linkage group 7. LOP is the logarithm of P values of score tests carried out every centimorgan (cM)
Summary statistics of QTL for RKN resistance on the TB map. is the heritability of the QTL
| LG | Position (cM) | Marker (bp) | Score | Mean ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTL | 7 | 6.74 | S7_976713 (976713) | 691.86 | < 2.22e–16 | 15.77 | 0.583 |
| Lower SI | 7 | 0.00 | S7_55468 (55468) | 596.41 | < 2.22e–16 | ||
| Upper SI | 7 | 49.01 | S7_4668738 (4668738) | 339.39 | < 2.22e–16 |
Lower and upper support intervals (SI) represent the boundaries upstream and downstream of the QTL on the linkage group (LG). Score represents the score statistics for the marker
Fig. 3Root-knot nematode (RKN) resistance locus in TB mapping population. a Linkage group (LG) 7. b The first 167 markers (1–20 cM of LG 7) show together with their allele variants, dosage and linkage phasing. From bottom to top, a through f and g through l represent ‘Beauregard’ and ‘Tanzania’ haplotypes, respectively. c Single-marker analysis has shown three highly significant markers (LOD ≈ 30), whereas d random-effect interval mapping has shown that all markers are highly significant (score test > 550, P value < 2.2e–16). e Regression on the marker dosage and f on the diploidized genotype call for S7_1038803. g Breakdown of genotypic values showing additive effects (as deviation from population mean, = 15.8) from each allele at the major QTL position (S7_1038803). Note how duplex markers in ‘Tanzania’ are in coupling-phase with h and i haplotypes at the highlighted locus in Fig. 3b