Literature DB >> 33812704

How natural selection shapes genetic differentiation in the MHC region: A case study with Native Americans.

Kelly Nunes1, Maria Helena Thomaz Maia2, Eduardo José Melo Dos Santos2, Sidney Emanuel Batista Dos Santos2, João Farias Guerreiro2, Maria Luiza Petzl-Erler3, Gabriel Bedoya4, Carla Gallo5, Giovanni Poletti6, Elena Llop7, Luiza Tsuneto8, Maria Cátira Bortolini9, Francisco Rothhammer10, Richard Single11, Andrés Ruiz-Linares12, Jorge Rocha13, Diogo Meyer14.   

Abstract

The Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) loci are extremely well documented targets of balancing selection, yet few studies have explored how selection affects population differentiation at these loci. In the present study we investigate genetic differentiation at HLA genes by comparing differentiation at microsatellites distributed genomewide to those in the MHC region. Our study uses a sample of 494 individuals from 30 human populations, 28 of which are Native Americans, all of whom were typed for genomewide and MHC region microsatellites. We find greater differentiation in the MHC than in the remainder of the genome (FST-MHC = 0.130 and FST-Genomic = 0.087), and use a permutation approach to show that this difference is statistically significant, and not accounted for by confounding factors. This finding lies in the opposite direction to the expectation that balancing selection reduces population differentiation. We interpret our findings as evidence that selection favors different sets of alleles in distinct localities, leading to increased differentiation. Thus, balancing selection at HLA genes simultaneously increases intra-population polymorphism and inter-population differentiation in Native Americans.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balancing selection; HLA; MHC; Native Americans; Populational differentiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33812704      PMCID: PMC8217218          DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2021.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Immunol        ISSN: 0198-8859            Impact factor:   2.211


  71 in total

1.  Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance.

Authors:  J Reynolds; B S Weir; C C Cockerham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  PyPop update--a software pipeline for large-scale multilocus population genomics.

Authors:  A K Lancaster; R M Single; O D Solberg; M P Nelson; G Thomson
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  2007-04

3.  Genetic signature of natural selection in first Americans.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Amorim; Kelly Nunes; Diogo Meyer; David Comas; Maria Cátira Bortolini; Francisco Mauro Salzano; Tábita Hünemeier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multiple instances of ancient balancing selection shared between humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Ellen M Leffler; Ziyue Gao; Susanne Pfeifer; Laure Ségurel; Adam Auton; Oliver Venn; Rory Bowden; Ronald Bontrop; Jeffrey D Wall; Guy Sella; Peter Donnelly; Gilean McVean; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Sexual selection for genetic compatibility: the role of the major histocompatibility complex on cryptic female choice in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).

Authors:  C Gessner; S Nakagawa; M Zavodna; N J Gemmell
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Greenlandic Inuit show genetic signatures of diet and climate adaptation.

Authors:  Matteo Fumagalli; Ida Moltke; Niels Grarup; Fernando Racimo; Peter Bjerregaard; Marit E Jørgensen; Thorfinn S Korneliussen; Pascale Gerbault; Line Skotte; Allan Linneberg; Cramer Christensen; Ivan Brandslund; Torben Jørgensen; Emilia Huerta-Sánchez; Erik B Schmidt; Oluf Pedersen; Torben Hansen; Anders Albrechtsen; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A new theory of MHC evolution: beyond selection on the immune genes.

Authors:  Cock van Oosterhout
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Adaptations to climate-mediated selective pressures in humans.

Authors:  Angela M Hancock; David B Witonsky; Gorka Alkorta-Aranburu; Cynthia M Beall; Amha Gebremedhin; Rem Sukernik; Gerd Utermann; Jonathan K Pritchard; Graham Coop; Anna Di Rienzo
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  A time transect of exomes from a Native American population before and after European contact.

Authors:  John Lindo; Emilia Huerta-Sánchez; Shigeki Nakagome; Morten Rasmussen; Barbara Petzelt; Joycelynn Mitchell; Jerome S Cybulski; Eske Willerslev; Michael DeGiorgio; Ripan S Malhi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Sampling for microsatellite-based population genetic studies: 25 to 30 individuals per population is enough to accurately estimate allele frequencies.

Authors:  Marie L Hale; Theresa M Burg; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Allele imputation for the killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor KIR3DL1/S1.

Authors:  Genelle F Harrison; Laura Ann Leaton; Erica A Harrison; Katherine M Kichula; Marte K Viken; Jonathan Shortt; Christopher R Gignoux; Benedicte A Lie; Damjan Vukcevic; Stephen Leslie; Paul J Norman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  How HLA diversity is apportioned: influence of selection and relevance to transplantation.

Authors:  André Silva Maróstica; Kelly Nunes; Erick C Castelli; Nayane S B Silva; Bruce S Weir; Jérôme Goudet; Diogo Meyer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.671

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.