Literature DB >> 33811595

Performance of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) on a quantity discrimination task is similar to that of African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana).

Rebecca J Snyder1, Lisa P Barrett2, Rachel A Emory2, Bonnie M Perdue3.   

Abstract

Using an object-choice task, we measured the relative quantity discrimination ability of Asian elephants. Two zoo-housed elephants were given auditory cues of food being dropped into two containers (Nonvisible condition), and in one condition they could also see the food on top of the containers (Visible condition). Elephants received sets of varying ratios and magnitudes. We found that the elephants chose the greater quantity of food significantly above chance in both the Visible and Nonvisible conditions. Additionally, we found the elephants' ability to discriminate between quantities decreased as the ratio, and not the absolute difference, between the quantities increased, which is predicted by the accumulator model. We also compare our findings to those from a study using the same methods with African savanna elephants and found that the two species performed at similar levels, but given our small sample size it is difficult to make strong species-level conclusions. In discussing our results, we consider differences between the two species' wild environments as well as the types of sensory cues provided in human care, and we provide recommendations for extensions of this work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accumulator model; Comparative cognition; Elephant cognition; Numerical cognition; Object-file model; Relative quantity judgment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33811595     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01504-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  37 in total

1.  The construction of large number representations in adults.

Authors:  Hilary Barth; Nancy Kanwisher; Elizabeth Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-01

2.  Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Marco Dadda; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Marco Dadda; Giovanna Serena; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young and old Western lowland gorillas.

Authors:  Ursula S Anderson; Tara S Stoinski; Mollie A Bloomsmith; Marcus J Marr; Anderson D Smith; Terry L Maple
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Tracking of food quantity by coyotes (Canis latrans).

Authors:  Joseph M Baker; John Shivik; Kerry E Jordan
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young, middle-aged, and older adult orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii and Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus).

Authors:  Ursula S Anderson; Tara S Stoinski; Mollie A Bloomsmith; Terry L Maple
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) succeed on a computerized test designed to assess conservation of discrete quantity.

Authors:  Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Relative quantity judgments in South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens).

Authors:  José Z Abramson; Victoria Hernández-Lloreda; Josep Call; Fernando Colmenares
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Relative quantity judgments in the beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas) and the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).

Authors:  José Z Abramson; Victoria Hernández-Lloreda; Josep Call; Fernando Colmenares
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Evidence for two numerical systems that are similar in humans and guppies.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Laura Piffer; Angelo Bisazza; Brian Butterworth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Congratulations to Animal Cognition on its 50th birthday! Some thoughts on the last 50 years of animal cognition research.

Authors:  Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.899

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.