| Literature DB >> 33811439 |
Hao Chen1,2,3, Xin Tang1,2,3, Ting-Li Han4, Jia-Nan Zhu1,2,3, Wei Zhou5, Philip N Baker2,6, Chang Chen1,2,7, Hua Zhang1,2.
Abstract
The forkhead box O3a protein (FoxO3a) has been reported to regulate tumour invasion and migration, but little is known about the molecular mechanism or its role in trophoblast invasion and migration into the uterus. In this study, we aim to explore its role in trophoblast development and placenta-related pregnancy complications and the potential mechanism. Levels of FoxO3a and its phosphorylated form (p-FoxO3a) in placental tissue from healthy pregnant women and pre-eclampsia patients were first compared. Then, HTR-8/SVneo cells were transfected with lentiviral vectors to deplete and overexpress FoxO3a. Western blot, immunohistochemistry, Cell Counting Kit-8, wound-healing assay, Matrigel invasion assay, cell apoptosis, cell cycle assay, RNA sequencing, qRT-PCR and ChIP-qPCR were performed on the cells to study the potential role of FoxO3a and the underlying mechanism. We found the expression of FoxO3a was decreased, whereas p-FoxO3a was increased in pre-eclampsia placentae. FoxO3a depletion significantly reduced transcription of the promoter region of intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM1) gene in ChIP assays and led to reduced invasion and migration of trophoblast cells, arrested cell cycle in G1 phase and increased apoptosis under oxidative stress. Our results suggested that FoxO3a may play a role in the regulation of trophoblast invasion and migration during placental development, which may be because of its affinity to the ICAM1 promotor.Entities:
Keywords: forkhead box O3a protein; intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1; migration; pre-eclampsia; transcriptomics
Year: 2021 PMID: 33811439 PMCID: PMC8093966 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Clinical characteristics of studied pregnant women
| Category | sPE | Normal(n = 7) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 31.0 ± 3.4 | 31.9 ± 6.8 | 0.88 |
| BMI at delivery (kg/m2) | 29.4 ± 3.1 | 26.1 ± 2.3 | 0.67 |
| Gestational age at delivery (weeks) | 38.7 ± 1.5 | 35.1 ± 0.5 | 0.88 |
| Parity | 0.3 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 0.67 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 173.7 ± 9.7 | 110.1 ± 4.9 | <0.000001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 111.4 ± 8.5 | 68.0 ± 4.5 | <0.000001 |
| Proteinuria | 3.0 ± 0.8 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.000003 |
| Placental weight(g) | 608.6 ± 59.4 | 648.9 ± 124.3 | 0.089474 |
| Neonatal birth weight (g) | 3141.4 ± 303.1 | 3058.6 ± 587.5 | 0.88 |
Severe pre‐eclampsia.
FIGURE 1Expression and distribution of FoxO3a in placental tissues. (A) Western blot analysis of FoxO3a and p‐FoxO3a. (B) CK7 and HLA‐G were markers for trophoblast cells. The distribution of FoxO3a in women with normal or pre‐eclamptic pregnancies was localized in trophoblast cells (200×; scale bar, 200 μm). Results are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 5, *P < .05. NC: Normal control, PE: pre‐eclampsia
FIGURE 2Transfection efficiency of lentivirus targeting FoxO3a in HTR8/SVneo cells and the level of FoxO3a in HTR8/SVneo cells treated with SNP at different concentrations. (A) Western blot analyses of FoxO3a for transfection efficiency of lentivirus after the HTR8/SVneo cells were transfected for 48 hours. (B) Western blot analyses of FoxO3a after treatment with SNP at increasing concentrations for 6 hours. Results are shown as mean ±SEM, n = 3, **P < .01 and ***P < .001
FIGURE 3FoxO3a regulates gene expression of HTR8/SVneo cells and ICAM1 transcription. (A) The heat map and Volcano plot illustrate the copy numbers of mRNAs. Red represents higher transcription, and blue represents lower transcription. (B) Disease ontology analysis shows 28 genes relate to pre‐eclampsia. (C) Enriched Gene Ontology (GO) analysis shows migration is the most affected biological process after FoxO3a knockdown in HTR8/SVneo cells. (D) KEGG pathway analysis shows the related pathways. (E) GSEA and protein‐protein interaction (PPI) analysis shows the decreased TNF signalling pathway. (F) qPCR shows reduced expression of the genes downstream of TNF signalling pathway. (G) ChIP‐PCR and ChIP‐qPCR for FoxO3a indicate it binds to the promoter region of ICAM1. Results are shown as mean ±SEM, n = 3, *P < .05, ***P < .001
FIGURE 4The change of apoptosis, cell cycle and proliferation of HTR8/SVneo cells with FoxO3a knockdown and overexpression. (A) Apoptosis of HTR8‐S/Vneo cells was detected by flow cytometry. (B) The alterations of cell cycle of HTR8‐S/Vneo cells were detected by flow cytometry. (C) CCK‐8 analysis was used to test proliferation of HTR8‐S/Vneo cells. Results are shown as mean ±SEM, n = 3, *P < .05, **P < .01 and ***P < .001
FIGURE 5The change of migration and invasion of HTR8/SVneo cells after FoxO3a knockdown. (A) Wound‐healing assay, n = 3 for each group, scale bars: 200 μm; and (B) Matrigel transwell assay, n = 3 for each group. Results are shown as mean ±SEM, **P < .01, ***P < .001