Literature DB >> 3381139

Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion.

K Gill1, M H Krag, G B Johnson, L D Haugh, M H Pope.   

Abstract

Spinal motion usually is recorded from subjective observation of the fully flexed trunk using a goniometer or the distance from the fingertips to the floor. To quantify functional improvement in the low-back pain patient, the repeatability of four clinical techniques was studied: the common fingertip-to-floor distance; the modified Schober; the two-inclinometer method, and a photometric technique. Ten normal subjects (five men, five women), ages 24 to 34 years old, were examined in full flexion, full extension, and the erect position, both standing and sitting. Repeatability was poor for the fingertip-to-floor method in all postures and for the two-inclinometer method in full flexion. Although other methods for various postures had good repeatability, the modified Schober method of determining lumbar spinal motion was the most repeatable and is recommended for a routine, noninvasive, clinical evaluation of lumbar spinal motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3381139     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198801000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  25 in total

1.  A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Katrin Knecht; Gordana Balaban; Jiri Dvorak; Dieter Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Working postures: a literature review.

Authors:  Edgar Ramos Vieira; Shrawan Kumar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

3.  Effects of stabilization exercise using a ball on mutifidus cross-sectional area in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Sinho Chung; Jusang Lee; Jangsoon Yoon
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Quantitative assessment of the motion of the lumbar spine in the low back pain population and the effect of different spinal pathologies of this motion.

Authors:  A H McGregor; I D McCarthy; C J Doré; S P Hughes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Fascia thickness, aging and flexibility: is there an association?

Authors:  Jan Wilke; Veronica Macchi; Raffaele De Caro; Carla Stecco
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Do MRI findings correlate with mobility tests? An explorative analysis of the test validity with regard to structure.

Authors:  Christoph Quack; Peter Schenk; Thomas Laeubli; Susanne Spillmann; Juerg Hodler; Beat A Michel; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Prediction of pain outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of dose-response of spinal manipulation for the care of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Darcy Vavrek; Mitchell Haas; Moni Blazej Neradilek; Nayak Polissar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Reliability of three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry measurements of lumbar flexion and extension.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Vanitha Arumugam; Joshua I Vincent; Kimberly L Payne; Aubrey K So
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The effects of dynamic exercise utilizing PNF patterns on abdominal muscle thickness in healthy adults.

Authors:  Wontae Gong
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-06-30

10.  Effects of an adapted physical activity program in a group of elderly subjects with flexed posture: clinical and instrumental assessment.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Benedetti; Lisa Berti; Chiara Presti; Antonio Frizziero; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.