BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastrointestinal (GI) lesions may have subtle morphological changes. Linked color imaging (LCI) combines narrow-band wavelength light and white light imaging (WLI) in appropriate balance to enhance lesion detection. We compared the detection rates of upper GI lesions using LCI and WLI. METHOD: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive tandem gastroscopy with WLI inspection followed by LCI, or vice versa. Endoscopic examination was performed using the EG-L590ZW gastroscope and the LASEREO endoscope system (Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan). Histology was reported by a specialist GI pathologist blinded to the technique of lesion detection and was used as the gold standard for diagnosis. RESULTS: Ninety patients (mean age 66.8 years, 51.5% male patients) were randomized to either LCI examination first followed by WLI (LCI-WLI), or vice versa (WLI-LCI). An 18.9% of gastroscopies in the study were for surveillance of previously known gastric cancer precursors. Ten patients (11.1%) had a history of Helicobacter pylori infection. There was no significant difference in the time taken for examination under LCI (311 ± 96 s) and WLI (342 ± 86 s) (P = 0.700). LCI detection rates were higher than WLI detection rates for gastric cancer precursors such as atrophic gastritis (2.19% vs 0.55%) (P < 0.01) and intestinal metaplasia (19.73% vs 7.67%) (P < 0.01). Both sensitivity (82.74% vs 50.96%) and specificity (98.71% vs 96.10%) of LCI were higher than WLI for detection of upper GI lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Linked color imaging had better detection rates, sensitivity, and specificity for detection of upper GI lesions compared with WLI.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastrointestinal (GI) lesions may have subtle morphological changes. Linked color imaging (LCI) combines narrow-band wavelength light and white light imaging (WLI) in appropriate balance to enhance lesion detection. We compared the detection rates of upper GI lesions using LCI and WLI. METHOD: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive tandem gastroscopy with WLI inspection followed by LCI, or vice versa. Endoscopic examination was performed using the EG-L590ZW gastroscope and the LASEREO endoscope system (Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan). Histology was reported by a specialist GI pathologist blinded to the technique of lesion detection and was used as the gold standard for diagnosis. RESULTS: Ninety patients (mean age 66.8 years, 51.5% male patients) were randomized to either LCI examination first followed by WLI (LCI-WLI), or vice versa (WLI-LCI). An 18.9% of gastroscopies in the study were for surveillance of previously known gastric cancer precursors. Ten patients (11.1%) had a history of Helicobacter pylori infection. There was no significant difference in the time taken for examination under LCI (311 ± 96 s) and WLI (342 ± 86 s) (P = 0.700). LCI detection rates were higher than WLI detection rates for gastric cancer precursors such as atrophic gastritis (2.19% vs 0.55%) (P < 0.01) and intestinal metaplasia (19.73% vs 7.67%) (P < 0.01). Both sensitivity (82.74% vs 50.96%) and specificity (98.71% vs 96.10%) of LCI were higher than WLI for detection of upper GI lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Linked color imaging had better detection rates, sensitivity, and specificity for detection of upper GI lesions compared with WLI.